Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Foveal light exposure is increased at the time of removal of silicone oil with the potential for phototoxicity

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is sudden and dramatic visual function deterioration in 1–10 % of eyes filled with silicone oil at the time of removal of silicon oil. Transmission of high-energy blue light is increased in eyes filled with silicone oil. We sought to identify if increased foveal light exposure is a potential factor in the pathophysiology of the visual loss at the time of removal of silicone oil.

Methods

A graphic ray tracing computer program and laboratory models were used to determine the effect of the intraocular silicone oil bubble size on the foveal illuminance at the time of removal of silicone oil under direct microscope light. The graphic ray tracing computer program revealed a range of optical vignetting effects created by different sizes of silicone oil bubble within the vitreous cavity giving rise to an uneven macular illumination. The laboratory model was used to quantify the variation of illuminance at the foveal region with different sizes of silicone oil bubble with in the vitreous cavity at the time of removal of silicon oil under direct microscope light. To substantiate the hypothesis of the light toxicity during removal of silicone oil, The outcome of oil removal procedures performed under direct microscope illumination in compared to those performed under blocked illumination.

Results

The computer program showed that the optical vignetting effect at the macula was dependent on the size of the intraocular silicone oil bubble. The laboratory eye model showed that the foveal illuminance followed a bell-shaped curve with 70 % greater illuminance demonstrated at with 50–60 % silicone oil fill. The clinical data identified five eyes with unexplained vision loss out of 114 eyes that had the procedure performed under direct microscope illumination compared to none out of 78 eyes that had the procedure under blocked illumination.

Conclusions

Foveal light exposure, and therefore the potential for phototoxicity, is transiently increased at the time of removal of silicone oil. This is due to uneven macular illumination resulting from the optical vignetting effect of different silicone oil bubble sizes. The increase in foveal light exposure may be significant when the procedure is performed under bright operating microscope light on already stressed photoreceptors of an eye filled with silicon oil. We advocate the use of precautions, such as central shadow filter on the operating microscope light source to reduce foveal light exposure and the risk of phototoxicity at the time of removal of silicone oil. The graphic ray tracing computer program used in this study shows promise in eye modeling for future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cibis PA, Becker B, Okun E, Canaan S (1962) The use of liquid silicone in retinal detachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 68:590–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeo JH, Glaser BM, Michels RG (1987) Silicone oil in the treatment of complicated retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 94:1109–1113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lesnoni G, Rossi T, Nistri A, Boccassini B (2000) Long-term prognosis after removal of silicone oil. Eur J Ophthalmol 10:60–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Newsom RS, Johnston R, Sullivan PM, Aylward GB, Holder GE, Gregor ZJ (2004) Sudden visual loss after removal of silicone oil. Retina 24:871–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbert EN, Laidlaw DA, Williamson TH, Habib M, Steel D (2005) Loss of vision once silicone oil has been removed. Retina 25:808–809, author reply 809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cazabon S, Groenewald C, Pearce IA, Wong D (2005) Visual loss following removal of intraocular silicone oil. Br J Ophthalmol 89:799–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Satchi K, Bolton A, Patel CK (2005) Loss of vision once silicone oil has been removed. Retina 25:807–808, author reply 808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liou HL, Brennan NA (1997) Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 14:1684–1695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Q, Chen X, Ge J, Liu Y, Jiang Z, Lin Z (2009) Refractive shifts in four selected artificial vitreous substitutes based on Gullstrand-Emsley and Liou-Brennan schematic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:3529–3534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fawcett IM, Williams RL, Wong D (1994) Contact angles of substances used for internal tamponade in retinal detachment surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:438–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbert EN, Habib M, Steel D, Williamson TH (2006) Central scotoma associated with intraocular silicone oil tamponade develops before oil removal. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:248–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Winter M, Eberhardt W, Scholz C, Reichenbach A (2000) Failure of potassium siphoning by Müller cells: a new hypothesis of perfluorocarbon liquid-induced retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:256–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Asaria RH, Kon CH, Bunce C, Sethi CS, Limb GA, Khaw PT, Aylward GW, Charteris DG (2004) Silicone oil concentrates fibrogenic growth factors in the retro-oil fluid. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1439–1442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rozanowska M, Sarna T (2005) Light-induced damage to the retina: role of rhodopsin chromophore revisited. Photochem Photobiol 81:1305–1330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parver LM, Auker CR, Fine BS (1983) Observations on monkey eyes exposed to light from an operating microscope. Ophthalmology 90:964–972

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman E, Kuwabara T (1968) The retinal pigment epithelium. IV. The damaging effects of radiant energy. Arch Ophthalmol 80:265–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ham WT Jr, Ruffolo JJ Jr, Mueller HA, Clarke AM, Moon ME (1978) Histologic analysis of photochemical lesions produced in rhesus retina by short-wavelength light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:1029–1035

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Refojo MF, Leong FL, Chung H, Ueno N, Nemiroff B, Tolentino FI (1988) Extraction of retinol and cholesterol by intraocular silicone oils. Ophthalmology 95:614–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Herbert EN, Liew SH, Williamson TH (2005) Visual loss after silicone oil removal. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1667–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Azzolini C, Docchio F, Brancato R, Trabucchi G (1992) Interactions between light and vitreous fluid substitutes. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1468–1471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osborne NN, Kamalden TA, Majid AS, del Olmo-Aguado S, Manso AG, Ji D (2010) Light effects on mitochondrial photosensitizers in relation to retinal degeneration. Neurochem Res 35:2027–2034

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest exist.

Clinical Trial Registration number

Not required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK, SE1 7EH

    Mahmut Dogramaci, Katie Williams, Ed Lee & Tom H. Williamson

  2. Flat 45 Stangate, Royal Street, London, SE17EQ, UK

    Mahmut Dogramaci

Authors
  1. Mahmut Dogramaci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katie Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ed Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tom H. Williamson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmut Dogramaci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dogramaci, M., Williams, K., Lee, E. et al. Foveal light exposure is increased at the time of removal of silicone oil with the potential for phototoxicity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 35–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2033-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2033-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation