Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural central india. The Central India Eye and Medical Study

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To investigate associations between anthropomorphic parameters and ocular dimensions in a typical rural society untouched by the effects of urbanization.

Methods

The Central India Eye and Medical Study performed in rural Central India included 4,711 participants aged 30 or more years. The participants underwent a detailed ophthalmic and medical examination.

Results

After controlling for age, gender, level of education, and body mass index (BMI), taller subjects were more likely to have larger eyes with a longer axial length (+0.23 mm for each 10 cm increase in height), lower corneal refractive power (-0.50 diopters for each 10 cm increase in height), deeper anterior chambers (+0.03 mm for each 10 cm increase in height), and longer vitreous cavity (+0.20 mm for each 10 cm increase in height). Central corneal thickness (P = 0.97) and lens thickness (P = 0.08) were not significantly associated with body height. After controlling for age, gender, level of education and height, subjects with a higher BMI had shorter globes (-0.02 mm for each unit increase in BMI), flatter corneas (-0.03 diopters for each unit increase in BMI) and thicker corneas (+0.49 μm for each unit increase in BMI), thicker lenses and longer vitreous cavities. Body height as compared with the BMI had a stronger influence on the ocular biometric data. After correcting for age, gender, level of education and axial length, for each increase in body height by 10 cm or for each increase in BMI by one unit, the refractive error significantly increased by 0.23 diopters (P < 0.001) and by 0.40 diopters (P < 0.001) respectively.

Conclusions

In the rural population of Central India without urbanization-associated myopization, body height and size of the eye were associated with each other: taller subjects had larger eyes with a flatter cornea. An increase in body height per 10 cm was associated with an increase in anterior chamber depth by 1% and an increase in vitreous cavity length by 1%. Subjects with a higher body mass index had shorter eyes, flatter and thicker corneas, and thicker lenses. Taller subjects and subjects with a higher BMI were more hyperopic. Since the occurrence of some ocular diseases depends on eye size and refractive error, the results may be helpful for screening examinations and for elucidating pathogenic associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Klein BE, Seah SK (2001) The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1237–1242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, Wu HM, Chia KS, Stone RA, Tan D (2002) Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1408–1414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Arnarsson A (2005) Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:734–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu HM, Gupta A, Newland HS, Sasaki H, Sasaki K (2007) Association between stature, ocular biometry and refraction in an adult population in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35:834–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Iwase A, Tajimi Study Group (2007) Corneal thickness and relating factors in a population-based study in Japan: the Tajimi study. Am J Ophthalmol 144:152–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alsbirk PH (1979) Refraction in adult West Greenland Eskimos: a population study of spherical refractive errors, including oculometric and familial correlations. Acta Ophthalmol 57:84–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Au Eong KG, Tay TH, Lim MK (1998) Education and myopia in 110, 236 young Singaporean males. Singapore Med J 34:489–492

    Google Scholar 

  8. Attebo K, Ivers RQ, Mitchell P (1999) Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 106:1066–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Srinivas M, McCarty CA, Rao GN (1999) Refractive errors in an urban population in Southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2810–2818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Chew SJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK (2000) Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2486–2494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT (2001) Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000. J Formos Med Assoc 100:684–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. VanNewkirk MR, Weih L, McCarty CA (2001) Taylor HR (2001) Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 108:960–967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saw SM, Nieto FJ, Katz J, Schein OD, Levy B, Chew SJ (2001) Familial clustering and myopia progression in Singapore school children. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 8:227–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Liu JH, Tsai SY, Chou P (2003) Refractive errors in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4630–4638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thulasiraj RD, Nirmalan PK, Ramakrishnan R, Krishnadas R, Manimekalai TK, Baburajan NP, Katz J, Tielsch JM, Robin AL (2003) Blindness and vision impairment in a rural south Indian population: the Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey. Ophthalmology 110:1491–1498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raju P, Ramesh SV, Arvind H, George R, Baskaran M, Paul PG, Kumaramanickavel G, McCarty C, Vijaya L (2004) Prevalence of refractive errors in a rural South Indian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:4268–4272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Noorul Huq DM, Johnson GJ (2004) Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: results of the national blindness and low vision survey of Bangladesh. Ophthalmology 111:1150–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prema R, George R, Sathyamangalam Ve R, Hemamalini A, Baskaran M, Kumaramanickavel G, Catherine M, Vijaya L (2008) Comparison of refractive errors and factors associated with spectacle use in a rural and urban South Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 56:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah SP, Jadoon MZ, Dineen B, Bourne RR, Johnson GJ, Gilbert CE, Khan MD (2008) Refractive errors in the adult Pakistani population: the national blindness and visual impairment survey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 15:183–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dirani M, Tong L, Gazzard G, Zhang X, Chia A, Young TL, Rose KA, Mitchell P, Saw SM (2009) Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol 93:997–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu L, Wang YX, Zhang HT, Jonas JB (2009) Anthropomorphic measurements and general and ocular parameters in adult Chinese. The Beijing Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; Oct 30. [Epub ahead of print]

  22. Nangia V, Bhojwani K, Matin A, Sinha A, Jonas JB (2009) Intraocular pressure and arterial blood pressure. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Arch Ophthalmol 127:339–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Bhojwani K (2009) Prevalence of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in Central India: The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Am J Ophthalmol 148:760–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. National Indian census 2001(http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Projected_Population/Projected_Population.pdf)

  25. Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Hofmann A, Jonas JB, de Jong PTVM (1999) Determinants of optic disk characteristics in a general population. The Rotterdam study. Ophthalmology 106:1588–1596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Congdon NG, Youlin Q, Quigley H, Hung PT, Wang TH, HoTC TJM (1997) Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese, white, and black populations. Ophthalmology 104:1489–1495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by an unrestricted grant from Om Drishti Trust Nagpur; Heidelberg Engineering Co. Heidelberg, Germany; Rotary Sight Saver Netherlands; Orbis India, and Carl Zeiss Meditec Co., Jena, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jost B. Jonas.

Additional information

Vinay Nangia and Jost B. Jonas contributed equally to this work.

Proprietary interest: none

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nangia, V., Jonas, J.B., Matin, A. et al. Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural central india. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 1657–1666 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1448-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1448-0

Keywords

Navigation