Skip to main content
Log in

Sex-related differences in olfactory function and evaluation of possible confounding factors among patients with Parkinson’s disease

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of specific sex-related patterns in olfactory dysfunctions of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the presence of specific sex-related patterns in olfactory dysfunctions excluding the possibility of confounding effects in patients with Parkinson’s disease. One hundred and sixty-eight participants (99 PD patients and 69 controls) were enrolled and evaluated using Sniffin’ Sticks Extended test (SSET). There was no significant sex difference in the control group for the SSET parameters. By contrast, in the PD group male patients scored significantly lower on odor discrimination (OD), identification (OI), and Threshold-Discrimination-Identification (TDI) score than females. On multivariable linear regression analysis, the only significant predictors of TDI score were sex and apathy. Among PD patients, men showed a significantly greater impairment compared to women in OI, OD and TDI score, but not in odor threshold (OT). These findings highlighted the possible role of sex differences in the development of associated PD non-motor symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Quinn NP (2000) Cross sectional prevalence survey of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in London. BMJ 321:21–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Doty RL (2007) Olfaction in PD. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13:S225–S228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fullard ME, Morley JF, Duda JE (2017) Olfactory dysfunction as an early biomarker in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull 33(5):515–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P (2017) Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 18(7):435–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haehner A, Boesveldt S, Berendse HW, Mackay-Sim A, Fleischmann J, Silburn PA, Johnston AN, Mellick GD, Herting B, Reichmann H, Hummel T (2009) Prevalence of smell loss in Parkinson’s disease—a multicenter study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15(7):490–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haehner A, Masala C, Walter S, Reichmann H, Hummel T (2019) Incidence of Parkinson’s disease in a large patient cohort with idiopathic smell and taste loss. J Neurol 266:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9135-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huisman E, Uylings HB, Hoogland PV (2008) Gender-related changes in increase of dopaminergic neurons in the olfactory bulb of Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord 23(10):1407–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Masala C, Solla P, Liscia A, Defazio G, Saba L, Cannas A, Cavazzana A, Hummel T, Haehner A (2018) Correlation among olfactory function, motors’ symptoms, cognitive impairment, apathy, and fatigue in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 265:1764–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poewe W (2008) Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 15(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02056.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baba Y, Putzke JD, Whaley NR, Wszolek ZK, Uitti RJ (2005) Gender and the Parkinson’s disease phenotype. J Neurol 252:1201–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo X, Song W, Chen K, Chen X, Zheng Z, Cao B, Huang R, Zhao B, Wu Y, Shang HF (2013) Gender and onset age related features of non-motor symptoms of patients with Parkinson’s disease—a study from southwest China. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 19:961–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haaxma CA, Bloem BR, Borm GF, Oyen WJ, Leenders KL, Eshuis S, Booij J, Dluzen DE, Horstink MW (2007) Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(8):819–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, Rocca WA, Vanni P, Maggi S, Perissinotto E, Grigoletto F, Amaducci L, Inzitari D, ILSA Working Group (2000) Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in a longitudinal study: twofold higher incidence in men. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Neurology 55:1358–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Melis M, Sollai G, Masala C, Pisanu C, Cossu G, Melis M, Sarchiotto M, Oppo V, Morelli M, Crnjar R, Hummel T, Tomassini Barbarossa I (2019) Odor identification performance in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease is associated with gender and the genetic variability of the olfactory binding protein. Chem Senses 44:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinez-Martin P, Falup Pecurariu C, Odin P, van Hilten JJ, Antonini A, Rojo-Abuin JM, Borges V, Trenkwalder C, Aarsland D, Brooks DJ, Ray Chaudhuri K (2012) Gender-related differences in the burden of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 259(8):1639–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Picillo M, Amboni M, Erro R, Longo K, Vitale C, Moccia M, Pierro A, Santangelo G, De Rosa A, De Michele G, Santoro L, Orefice G, Barone P, Pellecchia MT (2013) Gender differences in non-motor symptoms in early, drug naïve Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 260(11):2849–2855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Picillo M, Pellecchia MT, Erro R, Amboni M, Vitale C, Iavarone A, Moccia M, Allocca R, Orefice G, Barone P (2014) The use of University of Pennsylvania smell identification test in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease in Italy. Neurol Sci 35(3):379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Picillo M, Nicoletti A, Fetoni V, Garavaglia B, Barone P, Pellecchia MT (2017) The relevance of gender in Parkinson’s disease: a review. J Neurol 264:1583–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu R, Umbach DM, Peddada SD, Xu Z, Tröster AI, Huang X, Chen H (2015) Potential sex differences in nonmotor symptoms in early drug-naive Parkinson disease. Neurology 84(21):2107–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solla P, Cannas A, Ibba FC, Loi F, Corona M, Orofino G, Marrosu MG, Marrosu F (2012) Gender differences in motor and non-motor symptoms among Sardinian patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurological Sci 323:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. San Luciano M, Wang C, Ortega RA, Giladi N, Marder K, Bressman S, Saunders-Pullman R, The Michael J Fox Foundation LRRK2 Consortium (2017) Sex differences in LRRK2 G2019S and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 4(11):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.489

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S (1999) Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 56(1):33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Litvan I, Bhatia KP, Burn DJ, Goetz CG, Lang AE, McKeith I, Quinn N, Sethi KD, Shults C, Wenning GK (2003) Movement disorders society scientific issues committee report: SIC task force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord 18(5):467–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Conti S, Bonazzi S, Laiacona M, Masina M, Coralli MV (2015) Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)-Italian version: regression based norms and equivalent scores. Neurol Sci 36(2):209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H (2005) The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4):695–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cecchini MP, Federico A, Zanini A, Mantovani E, Masala C, Tinazzi M, Tamburin S (2019) Olfaction and taste in Parkinson’s disease: the association with mild cognitive impairment and the single cognitive domain dysfunction. J Neural Transm 126(5):585–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown RG, Dittner A, Findley L, Wessely SC (2005) The Parkinson fatigue scale. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 11(1):49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pedersen KF, Alves G, Larsen JP, Tysnes OB, Møller SG, Brønnick K (2012) Psychometric properties of the Starkstein apathy scale in patients with early untreated Parkinson disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 20(2):142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17(5):427–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fahn S, Elton R, Members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987) The unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease, vol 2. Macmillan Health Care Information, Florham Park, pp 153–163 (293–304)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE (2010) Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 25(15):2649–2653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) “Sniffin” sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.1.39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl 264(3):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Masala C, Saba L, Cecchini MP, Solla P, Loy F (2018) Olfactory function and age: a Sniffin’ sticks extended test study performed in Sardinia. Chem Percept 11:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-017-9233-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Doty RL, Deems DA, Stellar S (1988) Olfactory dysfunction in parkinsonism: a general deficit unrelated to neurologic signs, disease stage, or disease duration. Neurology 38(8):1237–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Masala C, Käehling C, Fall F, Hummel T (2019) Correlation between olfactory function, trigeminal sensitivity, and nasal anatomy in healthy subjects. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L 276:1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05367-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fagundo AB, Jiménez-Murcia S, Giner-Bartolomé C, Islam MA, de la Torre R, Pastor A et al (2015) Modulation of higher-order olfaction components on executive functions in humans. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0130319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Quinn NP, Rossor MN, Marsden CD (1987) Olfactory threshold in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50(1):88–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Doty RL, Cameron EL (2009) Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol Behav 97(2):213–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Boesveldt S, Yee JR, McClintock MK, Lundström J (2017) Olfactory function and the social lives of older adults: a matter of sex. Sci Rep 7:45118. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mayeux R, Marder K, Cote LJ, Denaro J, Hemenegildo N, Mejia H, Tang MX, Lantigua R, Wilder D, Gurland B et al (1995) The frequency of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease by age, ethnic group, and sex in northern Manhattan, 1988–1993. Am J Epidemiol 142:820–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beyer C, Pilgrim C, Reisert I (1991) Dopamine content and metabolism in mesencephalic and diencephalic cell cultures: sex differences and effects of sex steroids. J Neurosci 11(5):1325–1333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the participants for their availability and Dr. Alan Moat for improving the English text. This work was supported by a grant from the University of Cagliari (Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Dipartimentale, PRID 2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. Solla or C. Masala.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Prot. PG/2018/10157) and was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Participants received an explanatory statement and gave their written informed consent to participate in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solla, P., Masala, C., Liscia, A. et al. Sex-related differences in olfactory function and evaluation of possible confounding factors among patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 267, 57–63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09551-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09551-2

Keywords

Navigation