Abstract
Patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) show restricted signs of awareness but are unable to communicate. We assessed cerebral glucose metabolism in MCS patients and tested the hypothesis that this entity can be subcategorized into MCS− (i.e., patients only showing nonreflex behavior such as visual pursuit, localization of noxious stimulation and/or contingent behavior) and MCS+ (i.e., patients showing command following).
Patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism were studied using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in 39 healthy volunteers (aged 46 ± 18 years) and 27 MCS patients of whom 13 were MCS− (aged 49 ± 19 years; 4 traumatic; 21 ± 23 months post injury) and 14 MCS+ (aged 43 ± 19 years; 5 traumatic; 19 ± 26 months post injury). Results were thresholded for significance at false discovery rate corrected p < 0.05.
We observed a metabolic impairment in a bilateral subcortical (thalamus and caudate) and cortical (fronto-temporo-parietal) network in nontraumatic and traumatic MCS patients. Compared to MCS−, patients in MCS+ showed higher cerebral metabolism in left-sided cortical areas encompassing the language network, premotor, presupplementary motor, and sensorimotor cortices. A functional connectivity study showed that Broca’s region was disconnected from the rest of the language network, mesiofrontal and cerebellar areas in MCS− as compared to MCS+ patients.
The proposed subcategorization of MCS based on the presence or absence of command following showed a different functional neuroanatomy. MCS− is characterized by preserved right hemispheric cortical metabolism interpreted as evidence of residual sensory consciousness. MCS+ patients showed preserved metabolism and functional connectivity in language networks arguably reflecting some additional higher order or extended consciousness albeit devoid of clinical verbal or nonverbal expression.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N et al (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58:349–353
Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A et al (2011) From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol
Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C et al (1999) Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage 9:377–382
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020–2029
Laureys S, Faymonville ME, Degueldre C et al (2000) Auditory processing in the vegetative state. Brain 123:1589–1601
Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE (2005) Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 25:661–667
Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T (2002) Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15:870–878
Nakayama N, Okumura A, Shinoda J et al (2006) Relationship between regional cerebral metabolism and consciousness disturbance in traumatic diffuse brain injury without large focal lesions: an FDG-PET study with statistical parametric mapping analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 77:856–862
Rudolf J, Ghaemi M, Ghaemi M et al (1999) Cerebral glucose metabolism in acute and persistent vegetative state. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 11:17–24
Voss HU, Uluc AM, Dyke JP et al (2006) Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 116:2005–2011
Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ et al (2010) Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain 133:161–171
Laureys S (2005) The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn Sci 9:556–559
Boly M, Faymonville ME, Schnakers C et al (2008) Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 7:1013–1020
Laureys S, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P et al (2002) Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage 17:732–741
Boly M, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P et al (2004) Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. Arch Neurol 61:233–238
Coleman MR, Rodd JM, Davis MH et al (2007) Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain 130:2494–2507
Laureys S, Perrin F, Faymonville ME et al (2004) Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 63:916–918
Schiff ND, Rodriguez-Moreno D, Kamal A et al (2005) fMRI reveals large-scale network activation in minimally conscious patients. Neurology 64:514–523
Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C et al (2010) Visual fixation in the vegetative state: an observational case series PET study. BMC Neurol 10:35
Kentridge RW, Nijboer TC, Heywood CA (2008) Attended but unseen: visual attention is not sufficient for visual awareness. Neuropsychologia 46:864–869
Tamietto M, Cauda F, Corazzini LL et al (2009) Collicular vision guides nonconscious behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 22:888–902
Moreno DR, Schiff ND, Giacino J et al (2010) A network approach to assessing cognition in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 75:1871–1878
Longoni F, Grande M, Hendrich V et al (2005) An fMRI study on conceptual, grammatical, and morpho-phonological processing. Brain Cogn 57:131–134
Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Herve PY et al (2006) Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 30:1414–1432
Davis MH, Johnsrude IS (2003) Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J Neurosci 23:3423–3431
Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:393–402
Riecker A, Mathiak K, Wildgruber D et al (2005) fMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control. Neurology 64:700–706
Zhang J, Mitsis EM, Chu K, Newmark RE et al (2010) Statistical parametric mapping and cluster counting analysis of [18F] FDG-PET imaging in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 27(1):35–49
Gabrieli JD, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE (1998) The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:906–913
Haggard P (2008) Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:934–946
Haaland KY, Elsinger CL, Mayer AR et al (2004) Motor sequence complexity and performing hand produce differential patterns of hemispheric lateralization. J Cogn Neurosci 16:621–636
Gainotti G (2001) Disorders of emotional behaviour. J Neurol 248:743–749
Rushworth MF, Johansen-Berg H, Gobel SM et al (2003) The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. Neuroimage 20(Suppl 1):S89–S100
Gazzaniga MS (2000) Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123(Pt 7):1293–1326
Turk DJ, Heatherton TF, Macrae CN et al (2003) Out of contact, out of mind: the distributed nature of the self. Ann NY Acad Sci 1001:65–78
Damasio AR (1998) Investigating the biology of consciousness. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:1879–1882
Edelman GM (2004) Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. Yale University Press, New Haven and London
Laureys S, Perrin F, Bredart S (2007) Self-consciousness in non-communicative patients. Conscious Cogn 16:722–741 (discussion 742–745)
Seth AK, Dienes Z, Cleeremans A et al (2008) Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends Cogn Sci 12:314–321
Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C et al (2009) The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 177:49–61
Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR et al (2010) Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N. Engl J Med 362(7):579–589
Boly M, Garrido MA, Gosseries O et al (2011) Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science 332:858–862
Acknowledgments
The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of this report. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. This research was funded by the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FNRS), the European Commission (Mindbridge, DISCOS, Marie-Curie Actions, DECODER & COST), the James McDonnell Foundation, the Mind Science Foundation, the French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action (ARC-06/11-340), the Fondation Médicale Reine Elisabeth, and the University of Liège. SL and MAB participated in the conception and design of this study. MAB, AV, CS, OG, PB, and MK acquired the data. SL, MAB, and MB analyzed and interpreted the data. MAB and SL drafted the manuscript. AV, CS, AD, OG, MS, GM, and RH revised the manuscript for intellectual content. SL and GM obtained funding. RH and GM provided administrative, technical, or material support, and SL supervised the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruno, MA., Majerus, S., Boly, M. et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol 259, 1087–1098 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6303-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6303-7