Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Switching algorithms: from one immunomodulatory agent to another

  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the availability of six disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis, a significant minority of patients fail to respond adequately to treatment. Switching immunomodulatory therapy is a potentially useful treatment strategy in such patients. Several factors contribute to the need to switch between immunomodulatory treatments, including the variable response to drug treatment, the timing and choice of therapy, disease severity, and the occurrence of neutralising antibodies. Guidelines have been proposed to define treatment response, integrating both clinical and imaging criteria. Several observational studies, principally evaluating a switch from β-interferons to glatiramer acetate, have demonstrated that switching treatments is both safe and effective in patients with inadequate control of disease activity or who are experiencing unacceptable side effects with their original treatment. A treatment algorithm is proposed for decision-making when switching therapies appears warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caon C, Din M, Ching W, Tselis A, Lisak R, Khan O (2006) Clinical course after change of immunomodulating therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 13:471–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrá A, Onaha P, Luetic G, Burgos M, Crespo C, Deri N, Halfon J, Jacks G, Lopez A, Sinay V, Vrech C (2006) Switching of therapies in Argentina: 2-year follow-up. Mult Scler 12(Suppl 1):S94–S96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen BA, Khan O, Jeffery DR, Bashir K, Rizvi SA, Fox EJ, Agius M, Bashir R, Collins TE, Herndon R, Kinkel P, Mikol DD, Picone MA, Rivera V, Tornatore C, Zwibel H (2004) Identifying and treating patients with suboptimal responses. Neurology 63:S33–S40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen JA, Rovaris M, Goodman AD, Ladkani D, Wynn D, Filippi M (2007) Randomized, double-blind, dosecomparison study of glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 68:939–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gajofatto A, High A, Waubant E (2007) Switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) after treatment failure: does it have an impact on the course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Neurology 68(Suppl 1):A239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Hurwitz B, O'Connor PW, Oger JJ, Reder AT, Stevens JC (2007) Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta: assessment of their clinical and radiographic impact: an evidence report: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 68:977–984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartung HP, Polman C, Bertolotto A, Deisenhammer F, Giovannoni G, Havrdova E, Hemmer B, Hillert J, Kappos L, Kieseier B, Killestein J, Malcus C, Comabella M, Pachner A, Schellekens H, Sellebjerg F, Selmaj K, Sorensen PS (2007) Neutralising antibodies to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis : Expert panel report. J Neurol 254:827–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karussis D, Biermann LD, Bohlega S, Boiko A, Chofflon M, Fazekas F, Freedman M, Gebeily S, Gouider R, Havrdova E, Jakab G, Karabudak R, Miller A (2006) A recommended treatment algorithm in relapsing multiple sclerosis: report of an international consensus meeting. Eur J Neurol 13:61–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li DK, Zhao GJ, Paty DW (2001) Randomized controlled trial of interferon-beta-1a in secondary progressive MS: MRI results. Neurology 56:1505–1513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pozzilli C, Prosperini L, Sbardella E, De Giglio L, Onesti E, Tomassini V (2005) Post-marketing survey on clinical response to interferon beta in relapsing multiple sclerosis: the Roman experience. J Neurol Sci 26(Suppl 4):S174–S178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rio J, Nos C, Tintore M, Tellez N, Galan I, Pelayo R, Comabella M, Montalban X (2006) Defining the response to interferon-beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 59:344–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sørensen PS, Deisenhammer F, Duda P, Hohlfeld R, Myhr KM, Palace J, Polman C, Pozzilli C, Ross C (2005) Guidelines on use of anti-IFN-beta antibody measurements in multiple sclerosis: report of an EFNS Task Force on IFN-beta antibodies in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 12:817–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vallittu AM, Peltoniemi J, Elovaara I, Kuusisto H, Farkkila M, Multanen J, Eralinna JP (2005) The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in beta-interferon-intolerant MS patients. Acta Neurol Scand 112:234–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA, O'Connor P, Coyle PK, Ford C, Johnson K, Miller A, Pardo L, Kadosh S, Ladkani D (2007) Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Neurol 61:14–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zwibel HL (2006) Glatiramer acetate in treatment-naive and prior interferonbeta-1b-treated multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol Scand 113:378–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia K. Coyle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coyle, P.K. Switching algorithms: from one immunomodulatory agent to another. J Neurol 255 (Suppl 1), 44–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-1007-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-1007-3

Key words

Navigation