Abstract
Fifty secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients who had lost one or more EDSS points in the prior two years were selected to receive either cyclophosphamide (25 patients, 13 females, 12 males, F/M = 1.08; mean age: 42.4 years; mean disease duration: 13.3 years; mean EDSS at study entry: 5.7) or mitoxantrone (25 patients, 14 females, 11 males, F/M = 1.27; mean age: 38.2 years; mean disease duration: 11.5 years; mean EDSS at study entry: 5.5). SPMS patients were treated for two years with clinical evaluation (relapse rate, disability progression) every three months and radiological imaging (conventional magnetic resonance imaging) before therapy initiation and at the end of the first and second years of therapy. Safety profile and costs of the two therapeutic protocols were also analysed. In terms of clinical and radiological measures the drugs exerted a quite identical effect on both, and produced a significant reduction in both relapse rate (mitoxantrone Mito): p = 0.001, cyclophosphamide (Cy): p = 0.003) and disability progression (Mito: p = 0.01; Cy: p = 0.01). Subgroups of mitoxantrone- and cyclophosphamide-responding patients were identified (14/25 and 17/25, respectively) and were characterized by a significantly shorter duration of the secondary progressive phase of the disease. In these subgroups, the improvement in the EDSS score at the end of therapy was highly significant (p<0.0001 for Mito, p = 0.0004 for Cy). The safety profiles of both drugs were acceptable; however, the Cy-based therapy protocol was significantly less expensive. We conclude that Cy should be considered as a therapeutic option in rapidly deteriorating SPMS patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Millefiorini E, Gasperini C, Pozzilli C, et al. Randomized, placebo controlled trial of mitoxantrone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 24-month clinical and MRI outcome J Neurol 1997;244:154–159
Edan G, Miller D, Clanet M, et al. Therapeutic effect of mitoxantrone combined with methylperdisolone in multiple sclerosis: a randomized multicentre study of active disease using MRI and clinical criteria J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62:112–118
Hartung HP, Gonsette R, Konig N, et al. Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial Lancet 2002;360:2018–2025
Goodin DS, Arnason BGW, Coyle PK, Frhman EM, Paty DW. The use of mitoxantrone (Novantrone) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology 2003;61:1332–1338
Jeffery DR, Herndon R. Review of mitoxantrone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis Neurology 2004; 63:S19–S24
La Mantia L, Milanese C, Mascoli N, D’Amico R, Weinstock-Guttman B. Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, 2002; Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002819.
Hauser SL, Dawson DM, Lehrich JR, Beal LM, Kevy SV, Propper RD, Weiner HL. Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, three arm study of high dose cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTHN Engl J Med 1983;308:173–180
The Canadian Cooperative Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. The Canadian cooperative trial of cyclophosphamide and plasma exchange in progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1991,337:441–446
Likosky WH, Fireman B, Elmore R. Intensive immunosuppression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis : the Kaiser study J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54:1055–1060
Weiner HL, Mackin GA, Orav EJ, et al. and the Northeast Cooperative Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Group. Intermittent cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: final report of the Northeast Cooperative Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Group Neurology 1993;43:910–918
Weinstock-Guttman B, Kinkel RP, Cohen JA. Treatment of fulminant multiple sclerosis with intravenous cyclophosphamide Neurologists 1997;3:178–185
Gobbini MI, Smith ME, Richert ND, Frank JA, McFarland HF. Effect of open label pulse cyclophosphamide therapy on MRI meaures of disease activity in five patients with refractory relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis J Neuroimmunol 1999;99:142–149
Khan OA, Zvartau-Hind M, Caon C, et al. Effect of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide in rapidly deteriorating multiple sclerosis patients resistant to conventional therapy Mult Scler 2001;7:185–188
Hohol MJ, Olek MJ, Orav EJ, et al. Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with pulse cyclophosphamide/ methylprednisolone: response to therapy is linked to the duration of progressive disease Mult Scler 1999;5:403–409
Perini P, Gallo P. Cyclophosphamide is effective in stabilizing rapidly deteriorating secondary progressive multiple sclerosis J Neurol 2003;250:834–838
Weiner HL, Cohen JA. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with cyclophosphamide: critical review of clinical and immunologic effects Multiple Sclerosis 2001;8:142–154, 2002
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7
Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey Neurology 1996;46:907–911
Portaccio E, Zipoli V, Siracusa G, Piacentini S, Sorbi S, Amato MP. Safety and tolerability of cyclophosphamide ‘pulses’ in multiple sclerosis: a prospective study in a clinical cohort Mult Scler. 2003;9:446–50
de Bittencourt PR, Gomes-da-Silva MM. Multiple sclerosis: long-term remission after a high dose of cyclophosphamide Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;111:195–8
Smith D. Preliminary analysis of a trial of pulse cyclophosphamide in IFN-beta-resistant activeMS J Neurol Sci. 2004;223:73–9
Zephir H, de Seze J, Duhamel A, et al. Treatment of progressive forms of multiple sclerosis by cyclophosphamide: a cohort study of 490 patients J Neurol Sci. 2004;218:73–7
Zephir H, de Seze J, Dujardin K, et al. One-year cyclophosphamide treatment combined with methylprednisolone improves cognitive dysfunction in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis Mult Scler. 2005;11:360–3
Correale J, Rush C, Amengual A, Goicochea MT. Mitoxantrone as rescue therapy in worsening relapsing-remitting MS patients receiving IFN-beta J Neuroimmunol. 2005;162:173–83
Patti F, Reggio E, Palermo F, et al. Stabilization of rapidly worsening multiple sclerosis for 36 months in patients treated with interferon beta plus cyclophosphamide followed by interferon beta J Neurol. 2004;251:1502–6
Reggio E, Nicoletti A, Fiorilla T, Politi G, Reggio A, Patti F. The combination of cyclophosphamide plus interferon beta as rescue therapy could be used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients Twenty-four months follow-up. J Neurol. 2005 Jun 6; [Epub ahead of print]
Jeffery DR, Chepuri N, Durden D, Burdette J. A pilot trial of combination therapy with mitoxantrone and interferon beta-1b using monthly gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Mult Scler. 2005;11:296–301
Goffette S, van Pesch V, Vanoverschelde JL, Morandini E, Sindic CJ. Severe delayed heart failure in three multiple sclerosis patients previously treated with mitoxantrone.J Neurol. 2005 Apr 18; [Epub ahead of print]
Voltz R, Starck M, Zingler V, Strupp M, Kolb HJ. Mitoxantrone therapy in multiple sclerosis and acute leukaemia: a case report out of 644 treated patients Mult Scler. 2004;10:472–4
Tanasescu R, Debouverie M, Pittion S, Anxionnat R, Vespignani H. Acute myeloid leukaemia induced by mitoxantrone in a multiple sclerosis patient J Neurol. 2004; 251:762–3
Cohen BA, Mikol DD. Mitoxantrone treatment of multiple sclerosis: safety considerations Neurology. 2004;63:S28–32
Jeffery DR, Herndon R. Review of mitoxantrone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis Neurology. 2004;63:S19–24
Rizvi SA, Zwibel H, Fox EJ. Mitoxantrone for multiple sclerosis in clinical practice Neurology. 2004;63:S25–7
Scott LJ, Figgitt DP. Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis CNS Drugs. 2004;18:379–96
Hommes OR, Weiner HL. Clinical practice of immunosuppressive treatments in multiple sclerosis: results of a second international questionnaire J Neurol Sci. 2004;223:65–7
Smith DR, Balashov KE, Hafler DA, Khoury SJ, Weiner HL. Immune deviation following pulse cyclophosphamide/ methylprednisolone treatment of multiple sclerosis: increased interleukin-4 production and associated eosinophilia Ann Neurol 1997;42:313–318
Comabella M , Balashov K, Issazadeh S, Smith D, Weiner DS, Khoury SJ. Elevated interleukin-12 in progressive multiple sclerosis correlates with disease activity and is normalized by pulse cyclophophamide therapy J Clin Invest 1998;102:671–678
Takashima H, Smith DR, Fakaura H, Khoury SJ, Hafler DA, Weiner HL. Pulse cyclophosphamide plus methylprednisolone induces myelin-antigen-specific IL-4-secreting T cells in multiple sclerosis patients Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1998;88:28–34
Wender M, Tokarz-Kupczyk E, Mularek O. Early results of the treatment of chronic progressive forms of multiple sclerosis with cyclophosphamide and ACTH (Article in Polish) Neurol Neurochir Pol 1988;22:399–403
Weiner HL. Immunosuppressive treatment in multiple sclerosis J Neurol Sci. 2004;223:1–11
Gouthier SA, Weinwe HL. Cyclophosphamide therapy for MS The International MS Journal. 2005;12:52–58
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received in revised form: 5 January 2006
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perini, P., Calabrese, M., Tiberio, M. et al. Mitoxantrone versus cyclophosphamide in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 253, 1034–1040 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0154-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0154-7