Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Umbilical cord entanglement’s frequency and its impact on the newborn

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonaticide is a serious allegation that needs a complete chain of criminal investigations. In this context, a nuchal cord is considered to be responsible for an infant’s death, but there is a clear lack of evidence. The purpose of our study is to reveal if a nuchal cord can be responsible for stillbirth, poor perinatal outcome, or neonatal death in the forensic aspect. We conducted a prospective study in collaboration with the Augustinian Sisters’ Hospital in Cologne, Germany in the period from February 2014 to May 2016. Four-hundred eighty-six children were enrolled. All births were assessed regarding the occurrence of an umbilical cord entanglement, and perinatal outcome was measured by arterial blood gas analysis, Apgar after 1, 5, and 10 min after birth as well as the general vitality. The prevalence of a nuchal cord was 16.87%. Apgar decrease and acidosis were significantly associated with a nuchal cord. No adverse perinatal outcome was recorded in this constellation. There was no child death regarding the first 24 h, and no mother experienced a syncope while giving birth. We can conclude that a nuchal cord is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations (1989) General, A., Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989. Annu Rev Popul Law 16(95):485–501

    Google Scholar 

  2. Willinger M, James LS, Catz C (1991) Defining the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): deliberations of an expert panel convened by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatr Pathol 11(5):677–684. https://doi.org/10.3109/15513819109065465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mack-Detlefsen B, Banaschak S, Boemers TM (2015) Traumatic vulvar epithelial inclusion cysts following female genital mutilation (FGM). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 75(9):945–948. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Resnick PJ (1970) Murder of the newborn: a psychiatric review of neonaticide. Am J Psychiatry 126(10):1414–1420. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.126.10.1414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman SH, Resnick PJ (2009) Neonaticide: phenomenology and considerations for prevention. In: Int J law psychiatry, pp 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schulte B, Rothschild MA, Vennemann M, Banaschak S (2013) Examination of (suspected) neonaticides in Germany: a critical report on a comparative study. Int J Legal Med 127(3):621–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0841-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tursz A, Cook JM (2011) A population-based survey of neonaticides using judicial data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 96(4):F259–F263. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.192278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Herman-Giddens ME, Smith JB, Mittal M, Carlson M, Butts JD (2003) Newborns killed or left to die by a parent: a population-based study. JAMA 289(11):1425–1429. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.11.1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordrhein-Westfalen L (2015) Neonatizid. Die Tötung von Neugeborenen. Düsseldorf, Landeskriminalamt NRW

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collins JH (1997) Nuchal cord type a and type B. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70444-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kong CW, Lee DH, Chan LW, W.W. To (2015) Impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery, and management: a questionnaire survey of pregnant women. Hong Kong Med J 21(2):143–148. 10.12809/hkmj144349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Casper JL (1871)Practisches Handbuch der gerichtlichen Medizin. Hirschwald Verlag Berlin

  13. Miura N, Suzuki S (2008) Fetal asphyxia due to cord entanglement in a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by 2nd-trimester single intrauterine demise. Fetal Diagn Ther 23(1):69–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000109229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iffy L, Varadi V (1994) Cerebral palsy following cutting of the nuchal cord before delivery. Med Law 13(3–4):323–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Madea B (2007) Basiswissen Rechtsmedizin. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sheiner E, Abramowicz JS, Levy A, Silberstein T, Mazor M, Hershkovitz R (2006) Nuchal cord is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274(2):81–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0110-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong CW, Chan LW, W.W. To (2015) Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery in the presence of nuchal cord loops: implications on patient counselling and the mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(2):283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3630-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sornes T (2000) Umbilical cord knots. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79(3):157–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079003157.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Airas U, Heinonen S (2001) The clinical significance of umbilical knot in obstetrics. Duodecim 117(22):2273–2277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buyukkayaci Duman N, Topuz S, Bostanci MO, Gorkem U, Yuksel Kocak D, Togrul C, Gungor T (2017) The effects of umbilical cord entanglement upon labor management and fetal health: retrospective case control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1293033

  21. Kobayashi N, Aoki S, Oba MS, Takahashi T, Hirahara F (2015) Effect of umbilical cord entanglement and position on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Int 2015:342065. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/342065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogueh O, Al-Tarkait A, Vallerand D, Rouah F, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher RH (2006) Obstetrical factors related to nuchal cord. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(7):810–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340500345428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Assimakopoulos E, Zafrakas M, Garmiris P, Goulis DG, Athanasiadis AP, Dragoumis K, Bontis J (2005) Nuchal cord detected by ultrasound at term is associated with mode of delivery and perinatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123(2):188–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mastrobattista JM, Hollier LM, Yeomans ER, Ramin SM, Day MC, Sosa A, Gilstrap LC 3rd (2005) Effects of nuchal cord on birthweight and immediate neonatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 22(2):83–85. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-837737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghosh GS, Gudmundsson S (2008) Nuchal cord in post-term pregnancy - relationship to suspected intrapartum fetal distress indicating operative intervention. J Perinat Med 36(2):142–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2008.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miser WF (1992) Outcome of infants born with nuchal cords. J Fam Pract 34(4):441–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schaffer L, Burkhardt T, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J (2005) Nuchal cords in term and postterm deliveries--do we need to know? Obstet Gynecol 106(1):23–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000165322.42051.0f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Clapp JF 3rd (1999) B. Lopez and S. Simonean, nuchal cord and neurodevelopmental performance at 1 year. J Soc Gynecol Investig 6(5):268–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larson JD, Rayburn WF, Crosby S, Thurnau GR (1995) Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(4):1228–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)91359-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Carey JC, Rayburn WF (2000) Nuchal cord encirclements and risk of stillbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 69(2):173–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00219-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Freyer M (1887) Die Ohnmacht bei der Geburt vom gerichtsärztlichen Standpunkt. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91565-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Rodriguez-Manero M, Casado-Arroyo R, Sarkozy A, Leysen E, Sieira JA, Namdar M, Conte G, Levinstein M, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, Brugada P (2014) The clinical significance of pregnancy in Brugada syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 67(3):176–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2013.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Melatengürtel 60-62, 50823, Cologne, Germany

    Tatjana Walla, Markus A. Rothschild & Sibylle Banaschak

  2. Krankenhaus der Augustinerinnen, Gynecology and maternity clinic, Jakobstraße 27- 31, 50678, Cologne, Germany

    Jan C. Schmolling

Authors
  1. Tatjana Walla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus A. Rothschild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan C. Schmolling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sibylle Banaschak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatjana Walla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walla, T., Rothschild, M.A., Schmolling, J.C. et al. Umbilical cord entanglement’s frequency and its impact on the newborn. Int J Legal Med 132, 747–752 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1746-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1746-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation