Skip to main content
Log in

Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery in the presence of nuchal cord loops: implications on patient counselling and the mode of delivery

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review and compare the foetal outcomes and mode of delivery in patients with nuchal cord for single loop, double loops, and multiple loops.

Methods

A retrospective study of 4,404 singleton term pregnancies which underwent spontaneous labour was conducted. The patients were classified into five groups: without nuchal cord, nuchal cord of any turns, nuchal cord for 1 turn, nuchal cord for 2 turns and nuchal cord for 3 turns or above. The perinatal outcomes and mode of delivery were then compared.

Results

Nuchal cord of any turns was not shown to be associated with intrauterine death, neonatal death, Apgar score <7 at 1 and 5 min. Only nuchal cord for three turns or more were associated with higher incidence of meconium-stained liquor, neonatal unit admission, suspected foetal distress during labour and emergency caesarean section.

Conclusions

Only nuchal cord for 3 turns or more was associated with higher incidence of suspected foetal distress. However, the Apgar scores were not affected. Therefore, nuchal cord of any turns was not associated with adverse foetal outcomes. Prenatal ultrasound scan for nuchal cord is, therefore, unnecessary and there should be no differences in management of nuchal cord of any turns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheiner E, Abramowicz JS, Levy A, Silberstein T, Mazor M, Hershkovitz R (2006) Nuchal cord is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274(2):81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shrestha NS, Singh N (2007) Nuchal cord and perinatal outcome. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 5(3):360–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lal N, Deka D, Mittal S (2008) Does the nuchal cord persist? An ultrasound and color-Doppler-based prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34(3):314–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J (2005) Nuchal Cords in term and Postterm Deliveries- do we need to know? Obstet Gynecol 106(1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spellacy WN, Gravem H, Fisch RO (1966) The umbilical cord complications of true knots, nuchal coils, and cords around the body. Report from the collaborative study of cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 94(8):1136–1142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hankins GD, Snyder RR, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC 3rd, Hammond T (1987) Nuchal cords and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 70(5):687–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh G, Sidhu K (2008) Nuchal cord: a retrospective analysis. Med J Armed Forces India 64(3):237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. González-Quintero VH, Tolaymat L, Muller AC, Izquierdo L, O’Sullivan MJ, Martin D (2004) Outcomes of pregnancies with sonographically detected nuchal cords remote from delivery. J Ultrasound Med 23(1):43–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E (2005) Ultrasound detection of nuchal cord prior to labor induction and the risk of Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(2):160–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Assimakopoulos E, Zafrakas M, Garmiris P, Goulis DG, Athanasiadis AP, Dragoumis K, Bontis J (2005) Nuchal cord detected by ultrasound at term is associated with mode of delivery and perinatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123(2):188–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogueh O, Al-Tarkait A, Vallerand D, Rouah F, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher RH (2006) Obstetrical factors related to nuchal cord. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(7):810–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson JD, Rayburn WF, Crosby S, Thurnau GR (1995) Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(4):1228–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clapp JF 3rd, Stepanchak W, Hashimoto K, Ehrenberg H, Lopez B (2003) The natural history of antenatal nuchal cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(2):488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Narang Y, Vaid NB, Jain S, Suneja A, Guleria K, Faridi MM, Gupta B (2014) Is nuchal cord justified as a cause of obstetrician anxiety? Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(4):795–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamrakar SR (2013) Incidence of nuchal cord, mode of delivery and perinatal outcome: a notable experience in Dhulikhel Hospital–Kathmandu University Hospital. Nepal Med Coll J 15(1):40–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao Y, Xue Q, Chen G, Stone P, Zhao M, Chen Q (2013) An analysis of the indications for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170(2):414–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qin C, Zhou M, Callaghan WM, Posner SF, Zhang J, Berg CJ, Zhao G (2012) Clinical indications and determinants of the rise of cesarean section in three hospitals in rural China. Matern Child Health J 16(7):1484–1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boutsikou T, Malamitsi-Puchner A (2011) Caesarean section: impact on mother and child. Acta Paediatr 100(12):1518–1522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choi Wah Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, C.W., Chan, L.W. & To, W.W.K. Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery in the presence of nuchal cord loops: implications on patient counselling and the mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 283–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3630-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3630-4

Keywords

Navigation