Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays at the end of puberty and its applicability for age estimation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The BoneXpert method for automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays was introduced in 2009, covering the Greulich–Pyle bone age ranges up to 17 years for boys and 15 years for girls. This paper presents an extension of the method up to bone age 19 years for boys and 18 years for girls. The extension was developed based on images from the First Zurich Longitudinal Study of 231 healthy children born in 1954–1956 and followed with annual X-rays of both hands until adulthood. The method was validated on two cross-sectional studies of healthy children from Rotterdam and Los Angeles. We found root mean square deviations from manual rating of 0.69 and 0.45 years in these two studies for boys in the bone age range 17–19 years. For girls, the deviations were 0.75 and 0.59 years, respectively, in the bone age range 15–18 years. It is shown how the automated bone age method can be applied to infer the age probability distribution for healthy Caucasian European males. Considering a population with age 15.0–21.0 years, the method can be used to decide whether the subject is above 18 years with a false positive rate (children classified as adults) of 10 % (95% confidence interval = 7–13%) and a false negative rate of 30 % (adults classified as children). To apply this method in other ethnicities will require a study of the average of “bone age − age” at the end of puberty, i.e. how much this population is shifted relative to the Greulich–Pyle standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ninety-four per cent were taken within 14 days of the anniversary; 99% within a month.

  2. We actually sample BA* values, which we then transform to BA values in Fig. 6.

  3. To generate these, we actually sampled 2 million subjects and measured the density in a band covering ±0.1 years around BA.

References

  1. Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD (2009) The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:52–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thodberg HH (2009) Clinical review: an automated method for determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2239–2244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thodberg HH, Jenni OG, Caflisch J, Ranke MB, Martin DD (2009) Prediction of adult height based on automated determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4868–4874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thodberg HH, Neuhof J, Ranke M, Jenni OG, Martin DD (2010) Validation of bone age methods through their ability to predict adult height. Horm Res Paediatr 74:15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Björk A (1968) The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. Am J Phys Anthropol 29:243–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Thodberg HH (2009) Automatic determination of Greulich and Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children. Pediatr Radiol 39:591–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thodberg HH, Sävendahl L (2010) Validation and reference values of automated bone age determination for four ethnicities. Acad Radiol 17:1425–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin DD, Deusch D, Schweizer R, Binder G, Thodberg HH, Ranke MB (2009) Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age in children with short stature. Pediatr Radiol 39:598–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult Height (TW3 Method). WB Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Urschler M, Grassegger S, Stern D (2015) What automated age estimation of hand and wrist MRI data tells us about skeletal maturation in male adolescents. Ann Hum Biol 42:356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A et al (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122:457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malina RM, Peña Reyes ME, Figueiredo AJ, Coelho E, Silva MJ, Horta L, Miller R, Chamorro M, Serratosa L, Morate F (2010) Skeletal age in youth soccer players: implication for age verification. Clin J Sport Med 20:469–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin DD, Neuhof J, Jenni OG, Ranke MB, Thodberg HH (2010) Automatic determination of left- and right-hand bone age in the First Zurich Longitudinal Study. Horm Res Paediatr 74:50–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplowitz P, Srinivasan S, He J, McCarter R, Hayeri MR, Sze R (2010) Comparison of bone age readings by pediatric endocrinologists and pediatric radiologists using two bone age atlases. Pediatr Radiol 41:690–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang S-Y, Liu G, Ma C-G, Han Y-S, Shen X-Z, Xu R-L, Thodberg HH (2013) Automated determination of bone age in a modern Chinese population. ISRN Radiol 2013:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G (2010) Human dental age estimation using third molar developmental stages: does a Bayesian approach outperform regression models to discriminate between juveniles and adults? Int J Legal Med 124:35–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS, Corporation E (1994) Statistical methods in medical research. Wiley Online Library

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Visiana, Søllerødvej 57C, 2840, Holte, Denmark

    Hans Henrik Thodberg

  2. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Rick R. van Rijn

  3. Child Development Center, University Children’s Hospital Zürich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032, Zürich, Switzerland

    Oskar G. Jenni

  4. Tubingen University Children’s Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 1, 72076 Tübingen, and Filderklinik, Im Haberschlai 7, 70794, Filderstadt, Germany

    David. D. Martin

Authors
  1. Hans Henrik Thodberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rick R. van Rijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oskar G. Jenni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David. D. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Henrik Thodberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

HHT is the owner of Visiana, which develops and markets the BoneXpert medical device for bone age assessment. The other authors have nothing to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thodberg, H.H., van Rijn, R.R., Jenni, O.G. et al. Automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays at the end of puberty and its applicability for age estimation. Int J Legal Med 131, 771–780 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1471-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1471-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation