Automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays at the end of puberty and its applicability for age estimation
The BoneXpert method for automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays was introduced in 2009, covering the Greulich–Pyle bone age ranges up to 17 years for boys and 15 years for girls. This paper presents an extension of the method up to bone age 19 years for boys and 18 years for girls. The extension was developed based on images from the First Zurich Longitudinal Study of 231 healthy children born in 1954–1956 and followed with annual X-rays of both hands until adulthood. The method was validated on two cross-sectional studies of healthy children from Rotterdam and Los Angeles. We found root mean square deviations from manual rating of 0.69 and 0.45 years in these two studies for boys in the bone age range 17–19 years. For girls, the deviations were 0.75 and 0.59 years, respectively, in the bone age range 15–18 years. It is shown how the automated bone age method can be applied to infer the age probability distribution for healthy Caucasian European males. Considering a population with age 15.0–21.0 years, the method can be used to decide whether the subject is above 18 years with a false positive rate (children classified as adults) of 10 % (95% confidence interval = 7–13%) and a false negative rate of 30 % (adults classified as children). To apply this method in other ethnicities will require a study of the average of “bone age − age” at the end of puberty, i.e. how much this population is shifted relative to the Greulich–Pyle standard.
KeywordsBone age Age assessment Bayes Hand radiographs Asylum seekers
- 3.Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- 10.Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult Height (TW3 Method). WB Saunders, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 19.Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS, Corporation E (1994) Statistical methods in medical research. Wiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar