Skip to main content
Log in

A new chromosome fluorescence banding technique combining DAPI staining with image analysis in plants

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a new chromosome fluorescence banding technique was developed in plants. The technique combined 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining with software analysis including three-dimensional imaging after deconvolution. Clear multiple and adjacent DAPI bands like G-bands were obtained by this technique in the tested species including Hordeum vulgare L., Oryza officinalis, Wall & Watt, Triticum aestivum L., Lilium brownii, Brown, and Vicia faba L. During mitotic metaphase, the numbers of bands for the haploid genomes of these species were about 185, 141, 309, 456 and 194, respectively. Reproducibility analysis demonstrated that banding patterns within a species were stable at the same mitotic stage and they could be used for identifying specific chromosomes and chromosome regions. The band number fluctuated: the earlier the mitotic stage, the greater the number of bands. The technique enables genes to be mapped onto specific band regions of the chromosomes by only one fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) step with no chemical banding treatments. In this study, the 45S and 5S rDNAs of some tested species were located on specific band regions of specific chromosomes and they were all positioned at the interbands with the new technique. Because no chemical banding treatment was used, the banding patterns displayed by the technique should reflect the natural conformational features of chromatin. Thus it could be expected that this technique should be suitable for all eukaryotes and would have widespread utility in chromosomal structure analysis and physical mapping of genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–f
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arhondakis S, Auletta F, Torelli G, D’Onofrio G (2004) Base composition and expression level of human genes. Gene 325:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD, Bhandol P, Leitch IJ (2000) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses—807 new estimates. Ann Bot 86:859–909

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow M, Madan K (1974) The effects of various banding procedures on human chromosomes, studied with acridine orange. Cytogenet Cell Genet 12:145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch W, Martin R, Herrmann RG (1994) Sensitivity enhancement of fluorescence in situ hybridization on plant chromosomes. Chromosome Res 2:15–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Busch W, Martin R, Reinhold G, Herrmann RG, Hohmann U (1995) Repeated DNA sequences isolated by microdissection. I. Karyotyping of barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). Genome 38:1082–1090

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PR (1995) A chromomeric model for nuclear and chromosome structure. J Cell Sci 108:2927–2935

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig JM, Bickmore WA (1993) Chromosome bands—flavours to savour. BioEssays 15:349–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Cassia De Moura R, De Souza MJ, De Melo NF, De Castro Lira-Neto A (2003) Karyotypic characterization of representatives from Melolonthinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): karyotypic analysis, banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Hereditas 138:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drewary A (1982) G-banded chromosomes in Pinus resinosa. J Hered 73:305–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergun MA, Tan E, Sahin FI, Menevse A (1999) Numerical chromosomal abnormalities detected by atomic force microscopy. Scanning 21:182–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fransz PF, Armstrong S, de Jong JH, Parnell LD, van Drunen C, Dean C, Zabel P, Bisseling T, Jones GH (2000) Integrated cytogenetic map of chromosome arm 4s of A. thaliana: structural organization of heterochromatic knob and centromere region. Cell 100:367–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs J, Strehl S, Brandes A, Schweizer D, Schubert I (1998) Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of the Vicia faba genome—heterochromatin differentiation, replication patterns and sequence localization. Chromosome Res 6:219–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gernand D, Demidov D, Houben A (2003) The temporal and spatial pattern of histone H3 phosphorylation at serine 28 and serine 10 is similar in plants but differs between mono- and polycentric chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 101:172–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi O, Ushiki T (2001) Three-dimensional structure of G-banded human metaphase chromosomes observed by atomic force microscopy. Arch Histol Cytol 64:475–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houben A, Schubert I (2003) DNA and proteins of plant centromeres. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:554–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ISCN (1995) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature—high resolution banding. In: Mitelman F (ed) Karger, Basel

  • Kakeda K, Yamagata H, Fukui K, Ohno M, Fukui K, Wei ZZ, Zhu FS (1990) High resolution bands in maize chromosomes by G-banding methods. Theor Appl Genet 80:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim KB, Wennekes J, de Jong JH, Jacobsen E, van Tuyl JM (2001) Karyotype analysis of Lilium longiflorum and Lilium rubellum by chromosome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Genome 44:911–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masahiro H, Fukashi S, Ayako M, Yukie M, Eiji H, Teiji K, Katsuhiko K, Shozo Z, Aeyuan H (2002) Tandem repeat DNA localizing on the proximal DAPI bands of chromosomes in Larix, Pinaceae. Genome 45:777–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscone EA, Matzke MA, Matzke AJM (1997) The use of combined FISH/GISH in conjunction with DAPI counterstaining to identify chromosomes containing transgene inserts in amphidiploid tobacco. Chromosoma 105:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murata M, Orton TJ (1984) G-banded-like differentiation in mitotic prometaphase chromosomes of celery. J Hered 75:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Muravenko OV, Samatadze TE, Zelenin AV (1999) Image and visual analyses of G-banding patterns of chamomile chromosomes. Membr Cell Biol 12:845–855

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muravenko OV, Amosova AV, Samatadze TE, Popov KV, Poletaev AI, Zelenin AV (2003) 9-Aminoacridine: an efficient reagent to improve human and plant chromosome banding patterns and to standardize chromosome image analysis. Cytometry 51:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musio A, Mariani T, Frediani C, Sbrana I, Ascoli C (1994) Longitudinal patterns similar to G-banding in untreated human chromosomes: evidence from atomic force microscope. Chromosoma 103:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaki K, Cheng Z, Ouyang S, Talbert PB, Kim M, Jones KM, Henikoff S, Buell CR, Jiang J (2004) Sequencing of a rice centromere uncovers active genes. Nat Genet 36:138–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberringer M, Englisch A, Heinz B, Gao H, Martin T, Hartmann U (2004) Atomic force microscopy and scanning near-field optical microscopy studies on the characterization of human metaphase chromosomes. Eur Biophys J 32:620–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocalewicz K, Jankun M, Luczynski M (2003) Homologous chromosomes characteristics by sequential banding procedures in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Folia Biol (Krakow) 51:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffley EB, de Vries JN (1993) Giemsa G-banding in Allium. Biotech Histochem 168:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh Y, Laemmli UK (1994) Metaphase chromosome structure: bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold. Cell 76:609–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert I, Rieger R, Dobel P (1984) G and/or C-bands in plant chromosomes? J Cell Sci 71:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulten HJ, Gunawan B, Otto F, Hassmann R, Hallermann R, Hallermann C, Noebel A, Fuzesi L (2002) Cytogenetic characterization of complex karyotypes in seven established melanoma cell lines by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization and DAPI banding. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 133:134–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song YC, Liu LH, Ding Y, Tian XB, Yao Q, Meng L, He GR, Xu MS (1994) Comparisons of G-banding patterns in six species of the Poaceae. Hereditas 121:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1982) The nature and mechanisms of chromosome banding. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 6:59–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ushiki T, Hoshi O, Iwai K, Kimura E, Shigeno M (2002) The structure of human metaphase chromosomes: its histological perspective and new horizons by atomic force microscopy. Arch Histol Cytol 65:377–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HC, Kao KN (1988) G-banding in plant chromosomes. Genome 30:48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XF, Zhang ZL (1988) In situ induction of G-bands and microcoils in plant chromosomes. Hereditas 109:45–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 39870423) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2003034496).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Chun Song.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Shaw

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J.Y., She, C.W., Hu, Z.L. et al. A new chromosome fluorescence banding technique combining DAPI staining with image analysis in plants. Chromosoma 113, 16–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-004-0289-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-004-0289-1

Keywords

Navigation