Abstract
Yields of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb), i. e. the average number of dsb, \(\bar N\), per relative molar mass, M r, and dose, D, produced by electrons and photons in the energy range 50 eV-1 MeV were calculated. The experimental data of dsb induction by ultrasoft x-rays and by photons agree well with the calculated yields of dsb as a function of photon energy. The dsb are classified into simple and complex ones. Energy transfers of less than about 200 eV producing at least two ionizations generate mainly simple dsb, while low-energy electrons with an initial energy between 200 and 500 eV induce preferentially complex dsb. Assuming that dsb is the main DNA lesion leading to exchange-type chromosome aberrations (etca), three different mechanisms have to be considered: 1) complex dsb on its own; 2) interaction between two dsb induced by the same primary particle; and 3) interaction between two dsb induced by different primary particles. Mechanisms 1) and 2) produce a linear term, whereas mechanism 3) leads to a quadratic term for the yield of etca. The sum of contributions 1) and 2) to the yield of dicentrics describes fairly well the non-trivial structure of the experimental data. The results suggest that interaction between complex dsb does not contribute significantly to the formation of dicentrics via mechanism 3).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bryant PE (1984): Enzymatic restriction of mammalian cell DNA: evidence for the double strand breaks as potentially lethal lesions. Int J Radiat Biol 48: 55–60
Natarajan AT, Obe G (1984): Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of chromosomal aberrations. III. Restriction endonucleases. Chromosoma 90: 120–127
Frankenberg-Schwager M (1993): Radiation induced DNA lessions in eukaryotic cells, their repair and biological relevance. In: Swenberg CA, Horneck G., Stassinopolos EG (eds) Biological effects and physics of solar and galactic cosmic radiation. Part A. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–31
Bryant PE, Riches AC (1989): Oncogenic transformation of murine C3H10T1/2 cells resulting from DNA double-strand breaks induced by restriction endonuclease. Br J Cancer 60: 852–854
Borek C, Ong A, Morgan WF, Cleaver ZE (1991): Morphological transformation of 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells can be initiated by DNA double strand breaks alone. Mol Carcinog 4: 243–247
Ward JF (1990) The yield of DNA double-strand breaks produced intracellularly by ionizing radiation: a review. Int J Radiat Biol 57: 1141–1150
Paretzke HG (1987) Radiation track structure theory. In: Freeman GR (ed) Kinetics of nonhomogeneous processes. Wiley. New York, pp 89–170.
Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT (1991): Track structure analysis illustrating the prominent role of low energy electrons in radiobiological effects of low-LET radiations. Phys Med Biol 34: 691–705
Michalik V (1992) Model of DNA damage induced by radiations of various qualities. Int J Radiat Biol 62: 9–20
Michalik V (1993): Energy deposition clusters in nanometer regions of charged particle tracks. Radiat Res 134: 265–270
Lappa AV, Bigildeev EA, Burmistrov DS, Vasilyev ON (1993) TRION code for radiation action calculations and its application in microdosimetry and radiobiology. Radiat Environ Biophys 32: 1–19
Brenner DJ, Ward JF (1992): Constraints on energy deposition and target size of multiply-damaged sites associated with DNA double strand breaks. Int J Radiat Biol 61: 737–748
Hahn K, Roos H, Kellerer AM (1990): On the use of LET for a revised quality factor for photons. Radiat Prot Dosim 31: 367–370
Frankenberg D, Binder A (1985): RBE values for the induction of DNA double strand breaks as a function of photon energy. Radiat Prot Dosim 13: 157–159
Frankenberg D, Goodhead DT, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Harbich R, Bance DA, Wilkinson RE (1986): Effectiveness of 1.5 keV aluminium and 0.3 keV carbon K characteristic x-rays at inducing DNA double-strand breaks in yeast cells. Int J Radiat Biol 50: 727–741
Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Davies S, Roper MJ, Michael BD (1993) Measurement of DNA damage by electrons with energies between 25 and 4000 eV. Int J Radiat Biol 64: 651–658
Michalik V (1993): Estimation of double strand break quality based on track structure calculations. Radiat Environ Biophys 32: 251–258
Michalik V, Frankenberg D (1994): Simple and complex double-strand breaks induced by electrons. Int J Radiat Biol 66: 467–470
Schillaci ME, Carpenter S, Raju MR, Sebring RJ, Wilder ME, Goodhead DT (1989) Radiobiology of ultrasoft x-rays. II. Cultured C3H mouse cells (10T1/2). Radiat Res 118:83–92
Goodhead DT (1994): Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 65: 7–17
Ward JF (1985): Biochemistry of DNA lesions. Radiat Res 104: S103-S111
Lea DE, Catcheside DG (1942): Induction by radiation of chromosome aberrations in Tradescantia. J Genet 44: 216–245
Neary GJ (1965) Chromosome aberrations and the theory of RBE. I. General considerations. Int J Radiat Biol 9: 477–502
Revell SH (1974): The breakage-and-reunion theory and the exchange theory for chromosomal aberrations induced by ionizing radiation: a short history. Adv Radiat Biol 4: 367–416
Virsik RP, Harder D (1978): Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced by photon and electron radiations and the sublesion interaction model. In: Booz, J, Ebert HG (eds)Sixth symposium on microdosimetry. Harwood Academic. London, pp 869–881
Virsik RP, Schäfer CH, Harder D, Goodhead DT, Cox R, Thacker J (1980) Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by ultrasoft AlK and CK x-rays. Int J Radiat Biol 38: 545–557
Wilkinson RE, Goodhead DT, Thacker J (1985) Induction of chromosome aberrations by very short tracks at different stages of the cell cycle. Radiat Prot Dosim 13: 161–165
Thacker J, Wilkinson RE, Goodhead DT (1986): The induction of chromosome exchange aberrations by carbon ultrasoft x-rays in V79 hamster cells. Int J Radiat Biol 49: 645–656
Michalik V (1994): Distance distributions for energy deposition clusters in different particle tracks. Radiat Prot Dosim 52: 245–248
Kucherlapati RS, Eves EM, Song K, Morse BS, Smithies O (1984) Homologous recombination between plasmids in mammalian cells can be enhanced by treatment of input DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 3153–3157
Brenner DA, Smigocki AC, Camerini-Otero RD (1985): Effects of insertions, deletions, and double-strand breaks on homologous recombination in mouse L cells. Mol Cell Biol 5: 684–691
Song K, Chekuri L, Rauth S, Ehrlich S, Kucherlapati R (1985) Effect of double-strand breaks on homologous recombination in mammalian cells and extract. Mol Cell Biol 5: 3331–3336
Jasin M, De Villiers J, Weber F, Schaffner W (1985) High frequency of homologous recombination in mammalian cells between endogenous and introduced SV40 genomes. Cell 43: 695–703
Thomas KR, Folger KR, Capecchi MR (1986): High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell 44: 419–428
Conforth MN (1990): Testing the notion of the one-hit exchange. Radiat Res 121: 21–27.
Sasaki MS (1991) Primary damage and fixation of chromosomal DNA as probed by monochromatic soft x-rays and low energy neutrons. In: Fielden EM, O’Neil PO (eds) The early effects of radiation on DNA. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–384
Commings DE (1980): Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53: 131–143
Kellerer AM (1990) A generalized formulation of microdosimetric quantities. Radiat Prot Dosim 31: 9–16
Vyaz RC, Darroudi F, Natarajan AT (1991) Radiation-induced chromosomal breakage and rejoining in interphase-metaphase chromosomes of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 249: 29–35
Virsik RP, Harder D (1980) Recovery kinetics of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human G0-lymphocytes. Radiat Environ Biophys 18: 221–238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michalik, V., Frankenberg, D. Two types of double-strand breaks in electron and photon tracks and their relation to exchange-type chromosome aberrations. Radiat Environ Biophys 35, 163–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110050026
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110050026