Skip to main content
Log in

Two types of double-strand breaks in electron and photon tracks and their relation to exchange-type chromosome aberrations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yields of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb), i. e. the average number of dsb, \(\bar N\), per relative molar mass, M r, and dose, D, produced by electrons and photons in the energy range 50 eV-1 MeV were calculated. The experimental data of dsb induction by ultrasoft x-rays and by photons agree well with the calculated yields of dsb as a function of photon energy. The dsb are classified into simple and complex ones. Energy transfers of less than about 200 eV producing at least two ionizations generate mainly simple dsb, while low-energy electrons with an initial energy between 200 and 500 eV induce preferentially complex dsb. Assuming that dsb is the main DNA lesion leading to exchange-type chromosome aberrations (etca), three different mechanisms have to be considered: 1) complex dsb on its own; 2) interaction between two dsb induced by the same primary particle; and 3) interaction between two dsb induced by different primary particles. Mechanisms 1) and 2) produce a linear term, whereas mechanism 3) leads to a quadratic term for the yield of etca. The sum of contributions 1) and 2) to the yield of dicentrics describes fairly well the non-trivial structure of the experimental data. The results suggest that interaction between complex dsb does not contribute significantly to the formation of dicentrics via mechanism 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bryant PE (1984): Enzymatic restriction of mammalian cell DNA: evidence for the double strand breaks as potentially lethal lesions. Int J Radiat Biol 48: 55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Natarajan AT, Obe G (1984): Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of chromosomal aberrations. III. Restriction endonucleases. Chromosoma 90: 120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frankenberg-Schwager M (1993): Radiation induced DNA lessions in eukaryotic cells, their repair and biological relevance. In: Swenberg CA, Horneck G., Stassinopolos EG (eds) Biological effects and physics of solar and galactic cosmic radiation. Part A. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant PE, Riches AC (1989): Oncogenic transformation of murine C3H10T1/2 cells resulting from DNA double-strand breaks induced by restriction endonuclease. Br J Cancer 60: 852–854

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borek C, Ong A, Morgan WF, Cleaver ZE (1991): Morphological transformation of 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells can be initiated by DNA double strand breaks alone. Mol Carcinog 4: 243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward JF (1990) The yield of DNA double-strand breaks produced intracellularly by ionizing radiation: a review. Int J Radiat Biol 57: 1141–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paretzke HG (1987) Radiation track structure theory. In: Freeman GR (ed) Kinetics of nonhomogeneous processes. Wiley. New York, pp 89–170.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT (1991): Track structure analysis illustrating the prominent role of low energy electrons in radiobiological effects of low-LET radiations. Phys Med Biol 34: 691–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Michalik V (1992) Model of DNA damage induced by radiations of various qualities. Int J Radiat Biol 62: 9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michalik V (1993): Energy deposition clusters in nanometer regions of charged particle tracks. Radiat Res 134: 265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lappa AV, Bigildeev EA, Burmistrov DS, Vasilyev ON (1993) TRION code for radiation action calculations and its application in microdosimetry and radiobiology. Radiat Environ Biophys 32: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brenner DJ, Ward JF (1992): Constraints on energy deposition and target size of multiply-damaged sites associated with DNA double strand breaks. Int J Radiat Biol 61: 737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hahn K, Roos H, Kellerer AM (1990): On the use of LET for a revised quality factor for photons. Radiat Prot Dosim 31: 367–370

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frankenberg D, Binder A (1985): RBE values for the induction of DNA double strand breaks as a function of photon energy. Radiat Prot Dosim 13: 157–159

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frankenberg D, Goodhead DT, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Harbich R, Bance DA, Wilkinson RE (1986): Effectiveness of 1.5 keV aluminium and 0.3 keV carbon K characteristic x-rays at inducing DNA double-strand breaks in yeast cells. Int J Radiat Biol 50: 727–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Davies S, Roper MJ, Michael BD (1993) Measurement of DNA damage by electrons with energies between 25 and 4000 eV. Int J Radiat Biol 64: 651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michalik V (1993): Estimation of double strand break quality based on track structure calculations. Radiat Environ Biophys 32: 251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Michalik V, Frankenberg D (1994): Simple and complex double-strand breaks induced by electrons. Int J Radiat Biol 66: 467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schillaci ME, Carpenter S, Raju MR, Sebring RJ, Wilder ME, Goodhead DT (1989) Radiobiology of ultrasoft x-rays. II. Cultured C3H mouse cells (10T1/2). Radiat Res 118:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodhead DT (1994): Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 65: 7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ward JF (1985): Biochemistry of DNA lesions. Radiat Res 104: S103-S111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lea DE, Catcheside DG (1942): Induction by radiation of chromosome aberrations in Tradescantia. J Genet 44: 216–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Neary GJ (1965) Chromosome aberrations and the theory of RBE. I. General considerations. Int J Radiat Biol 9: 477–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Revell SH (1974): The breakage-and-reunion theory and the exchange theory for chromosomal aberrations induced by ionizing radiation: a short history. Adv Radiat Biol 4: 367–416

    Google Scholar 

  25. Virsik RP, Harder D (1978): Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced by photon and electron radiations and the sublesion interaction model. In: Booz, J, Ebert HG (eds)Sixth symposium on microdosimetry. Harwood Academic. London, pp 869–881

    Google Scholar 

  26. Virsik RP, Schäfer CH, Harder D, Goodhead DT, Cox R, Thacker J (1980) Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by ultrasoft AlK and CK x-rays. Int J Radiat Biol 38: 545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkinson RE, Goodhead DT, Thacker J (1985) Induction of chromosome aberrations by very short tracks at different stages of the cell cycle. Radiat Prot Dosim 13: 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thacker J, Wilkinson RE, Goodhead DT (1986): The induction of chromosome exchange aberrations by carbon ultrasoft x-rays in V79 hamster cells. Int J Radiat Biol 49: 645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Michalik V (1994): Distance distributions for energy deposition clusters in different particle tracks. Radiat Prot Dosim 52: 245–248

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kucherlapati RS, Eves EM, Song K, Morse BS, Smithies O (1984) Homologous recombination between plasmids in mammalian cells can be enhanced by treatment of input DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 3153–3157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brenner DA, Smigocki AC, Camerini-Otero RD (1985): Effects of insertions, deletions, and double-strand breaks on homologous recombination in mouse L cells. Mol Cell Biol 5: 684–691

    Google Scholar 

  32. Song K, Chekuri L, Rauth S, Ehrlich S, Kucherlapati R (1985) Effect of double-strand breaks on homologous recombination in mammalian cells and extract. Mol Cell Biol 5: 3331–3336

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jasin M, De Villiers J, Weber F, Schaffner W (1985) High frequency of homologous recombination in mammalian cells between endogenous and introduced SV40 genomes. Cell 43: 695–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas KR, Folger KR, Capecchi MR (1986): High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell 44: 419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Conforth MN (1990): Testing the notion of the one-hit exchange. Radiat Res 121: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sasaki MS (1991) Primary damage and fixation of chromosomal DNA as probed by monochromatic soft x-rays and low energy neutrons. In: Fielden EM, O’Neil PO (eds) The early effects of radiation on DNA. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–384

    Google Scholar 

  37. Commings DE (1980): Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53: 131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kellerer AM (1990) A generalized formulation of microdosimetric quantities. Radiat Prot Dosim 31: 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vyaz RC, Darroudi F, Natarajan AT (1991) Radiation-induced chromosomal breakage and rejoining in interphase-metaphase chromosomes of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 249: 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  40. Virsik RP, Harder D (1980) Recovery kinetics of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human G0-lymphocytes. Radiat Environ Biophys 18: 221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalik, V., Frankenberg, D. Two types of double-strand breaks in electron and photon tracks and their relation to exchange-type chromosome aberrations. Radiat Environ Biophys 35, 163–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110050026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110050026

Keywords

Navigation