Abstract
Evaluating the knowledge of patients attending radiology departments regarding ionizing radiation used in medical imaging and its associated hazards can provide knowledge of the patient’s awareness level of the associated risk of the radiation used in medical imaging. The aims of this study were to evaluate the awareness of patients regarding medical radiation types used in medical diagnostic imaging and its influence on their decision to proceed with that procedure. Over an 8-months period, a total of 418 patients, 48% Men and 52% Women, presenting for diagnostic imaging in the department of radiology, completed a 15-point questionnaire. The questionnaire included demographic and radiation awareness sections. Less than 32% of the participants had a potential risk of radiation explained by the doctor before the procedure. 59% of the participants expressed that the potential risk of radiation makes them anxious; less than about 25% of the participants showed that the potential risk of radiation affects their decision to have the procedure. Overall, the data collected from this survey indicate that there is a lack of information about radiation risk provided to the patients prior to the diagnostic procedure. Efforts should be made to ensure that patients receiving multiple medical imaging tests are aware of the radiation they are receiving.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldossari H, Ahmed N, AlShammari A (2019) Evaluation of awareness on radiation protection and knowledge about ionizing radiation among patients awaiting radiological examinations: a cross-sectional survey. Austin J Radiol 6(3):1100–1104
Almaghrabi A (2016) Study of knowledge and awareness of radiation exposure risk in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Int J Adv Res 4(7):1852–1856
Al-Rammah TY (2016) CT radiation dose awareness among paediatricians. Ital J Pediatr 42:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-016-0290-3
Alshammari K, Alramadan L, Ali J, Farraj M, Alanazi K, Almurbati A (2019) Knowledge and perception of patients towards the hazards and dose of diagnostic radiation in Bahrain. Int J Med Dev Ctries 3(12):1128–1134
Avramova-Cholakova S, Dimcheva M, Petrova E, Garcheva M, Dimitrova M, Palashev Y et al (2015) Patient doses from hybrid SPECT-CT procedures. Radiat Prot Dosim 165(1–4):424–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv130
Banerjee I, McNulty JP, Catania D, Maccagni D, Masterson L, Portelli JL et al (2019) An investigation of procedural radiation dose level awareness and personal training experience in communicating ionizing radiation examinations benefits and risks to patients in two european cardiac centers. Health Phys 117(1):76–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001049
Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ (2013) Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Ann Emerg Med 62(5):486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.018
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072149
Christodouleas JP, Forrest RD, Ainsley CG, Tochner Z, Hahn SM, Glatstein E (2011) Short-term and long-term health risks of nuclear-power-plant accidents. N Engl J Med 364(24):2334–2341. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1103676
Chung JH, Duszak R, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB (2019) Increasing utilization of chest imaging in US Emergency Departments From 1994 to 2015. J Am Coll Radiol 16(5):674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.011
Coleman RE, Delbeke D, Guiberteau MJ, Conti PS, Royal HD, Weinreb JC et al (2005) Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: intersociety dialogue from the joint working group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance. J Nucl Med 46(7):1225–1239
Doss M (2014) Addition of diagnostic CT scan does not increase the cancer risk in patients undergoing SPECT studies: comment on Brix et al.: radiation risk and protection of patients in clinical SPECT/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(Suppl 1):S146–S147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2711-0
Earnest F, Swensen SJ, Zink FE (2003) Respecting patient autonomy: screening at CT and informed consent. Radiology 226(3):633–634. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2263020626
European_Soc_Radiology (2015) Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom: essentials for health professionals in radiology. (1869–4101). Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000215424900002
Giles D, Hewitt D, Stewart A, Webb J (1956) Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet 271(6940):447. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(56)91923-7
Hollada J, Speier W, Oshiro T, Marzan-McGill R, Ruehm SG, Bassett LW et al (2015) Patient’s perceptions of radiation exposure associated with mammography. Am J Roentgenol 205(1):215–221. https://doi.org/10.2214/Ajr.14.13650
Howe GR, McLaughlin J (1996) Breast cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian Fluoroscopy Cohort Study and a comparison with breast cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb Survivors Study. Radiat Res 145(6):694–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579360
Kanda R, Tsuji S, Yonehara H (2012) Perceived risk of nuclear power and other risks during the last 25 years in Japan. Health Phys 102(4):384–390. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31823abef2
Kenny E, Byrne B, Lewis M, King DM (2019) Perception of medical radiation risk in Ireland: Results of a public survey. Phys Med 68:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.033
Linet MS, Kim KP, Rajaraman P (2009) Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr Radiol 39(Suppl 1):S4-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1026-3
Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, Kleinerman R, Lee C, Rajaraman P et al (2012) Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures (vol 62, pg 75, 2012). Cancer J Clin 62(4):277–277. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21145
Mainous AG 3rd, Hagen MD (1993) Public perceptions of radon risk. Fam Pract Res J 13(1):63–69
Mattsson S, Nilsson M (2015) On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks. Radiat Prot Dosim 165(1–4):17–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv037
Montes C, Tamayo P, Hernandez J, Gomez-Caminero F, Garcia S, Martin C et al (2013) Estimation of the total effective dose from low-dose CT scans and radiopharmaceutical administrations delivered to patients undergoing SPECT/CT explorations. Ann Nucl Med 27(7):610–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0724-6
Ria F, Bergantin A, Vai A, Bonfanti P, Martinotti AS, Redaelli I et al (2017) Awareness of medical radiation exposure among patients: a patient survey as a first step for effective communication of ionizing radiation risks. Phys Med 43:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.014
Ribeiro A, Husson O, Drey N, Murray I, May K, Thurston J et al (2020) Ionising radiation exposure from medical imaging-a review of Patient’s (un) awareness. Radiography (lond) 26(2):e25–e30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.002
Ricketts ML, Baerlocher MO, Asch MR, Myers A (2013) Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital. Can Assoc Radiol J 64(3):208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2012.05.002
Salerno S, Nardi C, Tudisca C, Matranga D, Vernuccio F, Di Piazza A et al (2018) Complete written/oral information about dose exposure in CT: is it really useful to guarantee the patients’ awareness about radiation risks? Radiol Med 123(10):788–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0909-0
Salvatori M, Rizzo A, Rovera G, Indovina L, Schillaci O (2019) Radiation dose in nuclear medicine: the hybrid imaging. Radiol Med 124(8):768–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-00989-y
Schauer DA, Linton OW (2009) NCRP report No. 160, ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure—are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 97(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000356672.44380.b7
Schuster AL, Forman HP, Strassle PD, Meyer LT, Connelly SV, Lee CI (2018) Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making. Emerg Radiol 25(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1557-8
Slovic P (1996) Perception of risk from radiation. Radiat Prot Dosim 68(3–4):165–180
Smith-Bindman R (2010) Is Computed tomography Safe? N Engl J Med 363(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1002530
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB (2008) Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff 27(6):1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1491
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2078–2086. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427
UNSCEAR (2000) The United Nations Scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Health Phys 79(3):314
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research for funding and supporting this research through the initiative of DSR scholarship support. Thanks to our medical student colleagues, Khalid Alkhamis and Majed Altulayan, for their help. Finally, we would like to express our special thanks of gratitude to Professor Syed Shahid Habib for his support and advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alawad, S., Abujamea, A. Awareness of radiation hazards in patients attending radiology departments. Radiat Environ Biophys 60, 453–458 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00919-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00919-5