Abstract
Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is considered as a valid option in the management of nasal adenocarcinoma (ADC). Comparative studies with open approaches are still required. A monocentric retrospective study was carried out from May 2002 to December 2013, including 43 patients with intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the ethmoid sinus. Non-resectable tumours or recurrences were excluded. Before 2008, open approach with lateral rhinotomy (LR) was performed as the gold standard of treatment. From 2008, ESS was systematically used as a first-line option as long as a complete resection was achievable. Adjuvant radiation therapy was delivered (RT) for all the patients. LR and ESS were performed in, respectively, 23 and 20 patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, occupational dust exposure, histopathological subtypes, and T stage based on the pathological assessment of the specimen (10 pT2, 26 pT3, 2 pT4a, and 5 pT4b). The tumour origin was mainly located in the olfactory cleft with the involvement of the cribriform plate in 60 % of patients. No major complication was observed in ESS group with a reduced hospital stay (5.6 vs 7.6 days). The disease-free survival was not different between LR and ESS groups over a mean follow-up period of 6.6 years. Even for local advanced stages with skull base involvement, we confirm the reliability and the advantages of ESS in terms of oncological outcomes and morbidity. We advocate complete excision of the olfactory cleft to ensure an appropriate control of the tumoral origin.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhayani MK, Yilmaz T, Sweeney A, Calzada G, Roberts DB, Levine NB, DeMonte F, Hanna EY, Kupferman ME (2014) Sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a 16-year experience at a single institution. Head Neck 36:1490–1496. doi:10.1002/hed.23485
Choussy O, Ferron C, Védrine PO, Toussaint B, Liétin B, Marandas P, Babin E, De Raucourt D, Reyt E, Cosmidis A, Makeiff M, Dehesdin D, GETTEC Study Group (2008) Adenocarcinoma of ethmoid: a GETTEC retrospective multicenter study of 418 cases. Laryngoscope 118:437–443. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815b48e3
d’Errico A, Pasian S, Baratti A, Zanelli R, Alfonzo S, Gilardi L, Beatrice F, Bena A, Costa G (2009) A case-control study on occupational risk factors for sino-nasal cancer. Occup Environ Med 66:448–455. doi:10.1136/oem.2008.041277
Jankowski R, Georgel T, Vignaud JM, Hemmaoui B, Toussaint B, Graff P, Geoffrois L, Henrot P, Kaminsky MC (2007) Endoscopic surgery reveals that woodworkers’ adenocarcinomas originate in the olfactory cleft. Rhinology 45:308–314
Gatta G, Bimbi G, Ciccolallo L, Zigon G, Cantú G, EUROCARE Working Group (2009) Survival for ethmoid sinus adenocarcinoma in European populations. Acta Oncol 48:992–998. doi:10.1080/02841860902874755
Stammberger H, Anderhuber W, Walch C, Papaefthymiou G (1999) Possibilities and limitations of endoscopic management of nasal and paranasal sinus malignancies. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 53:199–205
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
Labayle J (1957) Approach to ethmoidal tumors. Ann Otolaryngol 74:119–121
Nicolai P, Villaret AB, Bottazzoli M, Rossi E, Valsecchi MG (2011) Ethmoid adenocarcinoma–from craniofacial to endoscopic resections: a single-institution experience over 25 years. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:330–337. doi:10.1177/0194599811403873
de Gabory L, Maunoury A, Maurice-Tison S, Merza Abdulkhaleq H, Darrouzet V, Bébéar JP, Stoll D (2010) Long-term single-center results of management of ethmoid adenocarcinoma: 95 patients over 28 years. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1127–1134. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-0933-3
Van Gerven L, Jorissen M, Nuyts S, Hermans R, Vander Poorten V (2011) Long-term follow-up of 44 patients with adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and sinuses primarily treated with endoscopic resection followed by radiotherapy. Head Neck 33:898–904. doi:10.1002/hed.21556
Jardeleza C, Seiberling K, Floreani S, Wormald PJ (2009) Surgical outcomes of endoscopic management of adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal cavity. Rhinology 47:354–361. doi:10.4193/Rhin08.222
Vergez S, du Mayne MD, Coste A, Gallet P, Jankowski R, Dufour X, Righini C, Reyt E, Choussy O, Serrano E, Crampette L, Debry C, de Gabory L (2014) Multicenter study to assess endoscopic resection of 159 sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1384–1390. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3385-8
Llorente JL, Pérez-Escuredo J, Alvarez-Marcos C, Suárez C, Hermsen M (2009) Genetic and clinical aspects of wood dust related intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1–7. doi:10.1007/s00405-008-0749-y
Mackie S, Malik T, Khalil H (2010) Endoscopic resection and topical 5-Fluorouracil as an alternative treatment to craniofacial resection for the management of primary intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Minim Invasive Surg 2010:750253. doi:10.1155/2010/750253
Lund VJ, Chisholm EJ, Takes RP, Suárez C, Mendenhall WM, Rinaldo A, Llorente JL, Terhaard CH, Rodrigo JP, Maughan E, Ferlito A (2012) Evidence for treatment strategies in sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Head Neck 34:1168–1178. doi:10.1002/hed.21770
Grosjean R, Gallet P, Baumann C, Jankowski R (2014) Transfacial versus endoscopic approach in the treatment of woodworker’s nasal adenocarcinomas. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.23601
Lund V, Howard DJ, Wei WI (2007) Endoscopic resection of malignant tumors of the nose and sinuses. Am J Rhinol 21:89–94
Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Lambertoni A, Giovannardi M, Schreiber A, Volpi L, Bolzoni-Villaret A, Lombardi D, Bignami M, Magnoli F, Facco C, Antognoni P, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P (2015) Treatment strategies for primary early-stage sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective bi-institutional case-control study. J Surg Oncol 112:561–567
Camp S, Van Gerven L, Poorten VV, Nuyts S, Hermans R, Hauben E, Jorissen M (2016) Long-term follow-up of 123 patients with adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract treated with endoscopic resection and postoperative radiation therapy. Head Neck 38:294–300
Cantu G, Solero CL, Mariani L, Lo Vullo S, Riccio S, Colombo S, Pompilio M, Perrone F, Formillo P, Quattrone P (2011) Intestinal type adenocarcinoma of the ethmoid sinus in wood and leather workers: a retrospective study of 153 cases. Head Neck 33:535–542. doi:10.1002/hed.21485
Kennedy MT, Jordan RC, Berean KW, Perez-Ordoñez B (2004) Expression pattern of CK7, CK20, CDX-2, and villin in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 57:932–937
Gomaa MA, Hammad MS, Abdelmoghny A, Elsherif AM, Tawfik HM (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography and different imaging modalities in evaluation of sinonasal neoplasms diagnosed by histopathology. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat 26:9–15. doi:10.4137/CMENT.S10678
River Y, Schwartz A, Gomori JM, Soffer D, Siegal T (1996) Clinical significance of diffuse dural enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 85:777–783
Chiu AG, Ma Y (2013) Accuracy of intraoperative frozen margins for sinonasal malignancies and its implications for endoscopic resection of sinonasal melanomas. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3:157–160. doi:10.1002/alr.21075
Kreppel M, Amir Manawi NN, Scheer M, Nickenig HJ, Rothamel D, Dreiseidler T, Drebber U, Zinser M, Zöller JE, Guntinas-Lichius O, Preuss SF (2015) Prognostic quality of the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification, 7th edition, for cancer of the maxillary sinus. Head Neck 37:400–406. doi:10.1002/hed.23612
Blanco AI, Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Adli M, Thorstad WL, Simpson JR, Spector GJ, Haughey B, Perez CA (2004) Carcinoma of paranasal sinuses: long-term outcomes with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:51–58
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mortuaire, G., Leroy, X., Vandenhende-Szymanski, C. et al. Comparison of endoscopic and external resections for sinonasal instestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 4343–4350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4181-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4181-4