Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

One stage combined endoscopic and per-oral buccal fat pad approach for large oro-antral-fistula closure with secondary chronic maxillary sinusitis

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are numerous surgical approaches for oro-antral-fistula (OAF) closure. Secondary sinus disease is still considered by many experts a relative contra indication for primary closure. To describe a single-stage combined endoscopic sinus surgery and per-oral buccal fat pad (BFP) flap approach for large OAF causing chronic maxillary sinusitis. The records of all the patients with OAF and chronic manifestations of secondary rhinosinusitis that were treated between 2010 and 2013 in our tertiary care medical center were reviewed. The exclusion criteria were: OAF ≤ 5 mm, resolved sino-nasal disease, OAF secondary to malignancy, recurrent fistula, medical history that included radiotherapy to the maxillary bone and age <18 years. Each procedure was performed by a team consisting of a rhinologist and a maxillofacial surgeon. The surgical approach included an endoscopic middle antrostomy with maxillary sinus drainage, and a per-oral BFP regional flap for OAF closure. Total OAF closure, complications and need for revision surgeries. Forty-five patients that underwent OAF closure together with sinus surgery using a combined endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and BFP flap approach met the inclusion criteria. There were 28 males and 17 females with a mean ± SD age of 53.5 ± 14.9 years (range 22–80 years). The presenting signs and symptoms included purulent rhinorrhea (n = 22, 48.9 %), foreign body in sinus (n = 10, 22.2 %) nasal congestion (n = 7, 15.5 %), halitosis (n = 6, 13.3 %) and pain (n = 5, 12.2 %). Surgical complications included local pain (n = 2, 4.4 %), persistent rhinitis (n = 2, 4.4 %) and synechia (n = 1, 2.2 %). One patient required revision surgery due to an unresolved OAF. The OAF of all the other 44 patients (97.8 %) was closed after the first procedure and the paranasal sinuses on the treated side were completely recovered. The mean follow-up time for the group was 7.6 ± 4.3 months (7–21 months), and no untoward sequelae or recurrence were reported. Combined, one step, endoscopic Maxillary sinus drainage together with per-oral BFP flap approach is an efficacious surgical approach for safe closure of OAFs that are complicated with secondary chronic maxillary sinusitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brook I (2006) Sinusitis of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(3):349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anavi Y, Gal G, Silfen R, Calderon S (2003) Palatal rotation-advancement flap for delayed repair of oroantral fistula: a retrospective evaluation of 63 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(5):527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehra P, Murad H (2004) Maxillary sinus disease of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 37(2):347–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain MK, Ramesh C, Sankar K, Lokesh Babu KT (2012) Pedicled buccal fat pad in the management of oroantral fistula: a clinical study of 15 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(8):1025–1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Visscher SH, van Minnen B, Bos RR (2010) Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(6):1384–1391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Egyedi P (1977) Utilization of the buccal fat pad for closure of oro-antral and/or oro-nasal communications. J Maxillofac Surg 5(4):241–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Baker TJ, Wolfe SA (1990) The anatomy and clinical applications of the buccal fat pad. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(1):29–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang HM, Yan YP, Qi KM, Wang JQ, Liu ZF (2002) Anatomical structure of the buccal fat pad and its clinical adaptations. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2509–2518 (discussion 2519–2520)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neder A (1983) Use of buccal fat pad for grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 55(4):349–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stajcic Z (1992) The buccal fat pad in the closure of oro-antral communications: a study of 56 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 20(5):193–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. el-Hakim IE, el-Fakharany AM (1999) The use of the pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) and palatal rotating flaps in closure of oroantral communication and palatal defects. J Laryngol Otol 113(9):834–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh J, Prasad K, Lalitha RM, Ranganath K (2010) Buccal pad of fat and its applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of published literature (February) 2004 to (July) 2009. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110(6):698–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poeschl PW, Baumann A, Russmueller G, Poeschl E, Klug C, Ewers R (2009) Closure of oroantral communications with Bichat’s buccal fat pad. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(7):1460–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopatin AS, Sysolyatin SP, Sysolyatin PG, Melnikov MN (2002) Chronic maxillary sinusitis of dental origin: is external surgical approach mandatory? Laryngoscope. 112(6):1056–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fusetti S, Emanuelli E, Ghirotto C, Bettini G, Ferronato G (2010) Chronic oroantral fistula: combined endoscopic and intraoral approach under local anesthesia. Am J Otolaryngol 34(4):323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hajiioannou J, Koudounarakis E, Alexopoulos K, Kotsani A, Kyrmizakis DE (2007) Maxillary sinusitis of dental origin due to oroantral fistula, treated by endoscopic sinus surgery and primary fistula closure. J Laryngol Otol 124(9):986–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Costa F, Emanuelli E, Robiony M, Zerman N, Polini F, Politi M (2007) Endoscopic surgical treatment of chronic maxillary sinusitis of dental origin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(2):223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yalcin S, Oncu B, Emes Y, Atalay B, Aktas I (2010) Surgical treatment of oroantral fistulas: a clinical study of 23 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(2):333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andric M, Saranovic V, Drazic R, Brkovic B, Todorovic L (2009) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery as an adjunctive treatment for closure of oroantral fistulae: a retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(4):510–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Messerklinger W (1972) Nasal endoscopy: the middle nasal meatus and its specific inflammations. HNO 20(7):212–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Esther Eshkol is thanked for editorial assistance.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilan Koren.

Additional information

G. Horowitz and I. Koren have equally contributed to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horowitz, G., Koren, I., Carmel, N. et al. One stage combined endoscopic and per-oral buccal fat pad approach for large oro-antral-fistula closure with secondary chronic maxillary sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 905–909 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3656-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3656-z

Keywords

Navigation