Skip to main content
Log in

The intranasal Schirmer test: a preliminary study to quantify nasal secretion

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adequate secretion of the nasal mucosa is essential for normal nasal physiology. A “dry” nose is a frequent complaint of ENT patients. Measurement of secretion is currently impossible because of the absence of a recognized test. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of an intranasal Schirmer test in a large number of patients and to define standard values for nasal secretion. The test population comprised 159 healthy, non-smoking volunteers and 30 healthy smoking volunteers. All subjects were examined by nasal endoscopy for anatomic or mucosal disease. A Schirmer test strip was placed on both sides of the mucosa of the anterior nasal septum by anterior rhinoscopy. After 10 min in standardized conditions, the strip was removed and the wetted distance was measured. Active anterior rhinomanometry (ARR) and acoustic rhinometry (AR) were later performed. In the non-smoking group (n = 159), the median wetting distance of the test strip was 10.3 mm (range 3.6–35.0 mm). Age, gender, nasal geometry, and flow (according to ARR and AR) had no significant influence on nasal secretion. The test for normal distribution was negative. In the smoking group (n = 30), the median wetting distance was 8.4 mm (range 2.5–28.0 mm), significantly shorter than the wetting distance in the non-smoking group (p < 0.05). The Schirmer test offers a practical method to quantify mucosal humidification. The test is inexpensive and well tolerated by patients. In healthy people, wetting distances from 6 to 18 mm are considered normal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keck T, Lindemann J (2010) Numerical simulation and nasal air-conditioning. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 9:Doc08

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kastl KG, Rettinger G, Keck T (2009) The impact of nasal surgery on air-conditioning of the nasal airways. Rhinology 47:237–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keck T, Rozsasi A, Gruen PM (2011) Nasal-air conditioning. HNO 59(38):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naftali S, Rosenfeld M, Wolf M, Elad D (2005) The air-conditioning capacity of the human nose. Ann Biomed Eng 33:545–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elad D, Wolf M, Keck T (2008) Air-conditioning in the human nasal cavity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 163:121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hildenbrand T, Weber RK, Brehmer D (2011) Rhinitis sicca, dry nose and atrophic rhinitis: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:17–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noback ML, Harvati K, Spoor F (2011) Climate-related variation of the human nasal cavity. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:599–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rios JL de M, Boechat JL, Gioda A, dos Santos CY, de Aquino Neto FR, Lapa e Silva JR (2009) Symptoms prevalence among office workers of a sealed versus a non-sealed building: associations to indoor air quality. Environ Int 35: 1136–1141

  9. indemann J, Tsakiropoulou E, Keck T, Leiacker R, Wiesmiller KM. Nasal air conditioning in relation to acoustic rhinometry values. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23: 575–577

  10. Lindemann J, Sannwald D, Wiesmiller K (2008) Age-related changes in intranasal air conditioning in the elderly. Laryngoscope 118:1472–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller D, Greiner J (1994) Corneal measurements and tests. In: Albert and jakobiec’s principles and practice of ophthalmology. Saunders 4–13

  12. Lang GK (2008) Tränenorgane. In: Augenheilkunde. Thieme Georg 47–64

  13. Markovic O, Cernak M, Bilek J, Nepp J (2009) Sicca-Syndrom: anamnese und Grundlagen der Therapie. J für Minderalstoffwechsel 16:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen A, Wai Y, Lee L, Lake S, Woo S-B (2005) Using the modified Schirmer test to measure mouth dryness: a preliminary study. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 164–170; quiz 229–230

    Google Scholar 

  15. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F, Bermejo-Fenoll A (2006) A simple test for salivary gland hypofunction using Oral Schirmer’s test. J Oral Pathol Med 35:244–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saunte C (1983) Quantification of salivation, nasal secretion and tearing in man. Cephalalgia 3:159–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kern EB (1981) Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 19:231–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HY, Dhong H-J, Hong SD, Lee HJ, Cho HJ, Chung SK. Paradoxical nasal obstruction: analysis of characteristics using acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol 21: 408–411

  19. Tahamiler R, Yener M, Canakcioglu S (2009) Detection of the nasal cycle in daily activity by remote evaluation of nasal sound. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JH, Hyun PM (1988) The reproducibility of the Schirmer test. Korean J Ophthalmol 2:5–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahin Yilmaz AA, Corey JP (2006) Rhinitis in the elderly. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 6:125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edelstein DR (1996) Aging of the normal nose in adults. Laryngoscope 106:1–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baraniuk JN (1991) Neural control of human nasal secretion. Pulm Pharmacol 4:20–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benninger MS The impact of cigarette smoking and environmental tobacco smoke on nasal and sinus disease: a review of the literature. Am J Rhinol 13: 435–438

  25. Stjärne P, Lundblad L, Lundberg JM, Anggård A (1989) Capsaicin and nicotine-sensitive afferent neurones and nasal secretion in healthy human volunteers and in patients with vasomotor rhinitis. Br J Pharmacol 96:693–701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has a financial or other interest that might pose a conflict of interest with the submitted article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Sommer.

Additional information

Last authorship shared between Dr. Valerie Picavet and Dr. Fabian Sommer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindemann, J., Tsakiropoulou, E., Rettinger, G. et al. The intranasal Schirmer test: a preliminary study to quantify nasal secretion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 2963–2967 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2988-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2988-4

Keywords

Navigation