Skip to main content

Direct or Objective Evaluation of Nasal Function: Nasal Mucosal Microscopy, Mucociliary Transport, Flow Rhinometry, Acoustic Rhinometry and Olfactory Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diseases of the Sinuses

Abstract

Anterior rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy, skin prick test, nasal cytology, specific IgE analysis, rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, olfactory screening, mucociliary transport, and imaging studies comprise the tools readily available to the otolaryngologist and allergist to use to clarify/confirm a diagnosis of rhinitis and/or rhinosinusitis.

Nasal cytology functions as an aid in differentiating allergic, nonallergic and infectious rhinitis, viral and bacterial infections, and inflammatory and noninflammatory formats of rhinitis. The in-office methods for obtaining a sample of nasal secretions are nose blowing or lavage. Nasal mucous, mucosa, and submucosa are obtained by swabbing, brushing, or scrapping the nasal surface or through a biopsy. Wright-Giemsa is an easy and accurate staining method for all nasal cytologic specimens. Hansel stain is the simplest to perform if only the identification of eosinophils is desired. The presence of squamous epithelial cells suggests that the specimen was taken from the nasal vestibule or anterior tip of the inferior turbinate and has no diagnostic value. The presence of non-squamous epithelial cells suggests a properly obtained specimen. Non-squamous cells are ciliated and non-ciliated columnar cells, goblet cells, and basal cells. The identification of neutrophils, intracellular bacteria, eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes each denotes a format of immune-mediated activity when sampled with a scrapping technique and stained with Wright-Giemsa.

Trapped noxious chemicals, particulates, and pathogens are removed from the airway before they can invade the mucosa by a mechanism termed mucociliary clearance, mucociliary transport, or mucociliary escalator. Functional screening assays of mucociliary transport include the saccharine granule test, charcoal tablet test, and rhinoscintigraphy.

Objective measures of nasal airway patency can be useful in assisting the clinician by assessing airway patency at baseline using pre- and post-decongesting evaluation and assessing airway patency in serial fashion over time to track a patient’s response to therapy and to monitor for early signs of disease recrudescence. For measuring nasal patency, two forms of measurement are commonly used: rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry. Rhinomanometry describes airway patency based on nasal airflow and airway resistance measurements. Acoustic rhinometry estimates patency based on the measurement of reflected sound waves (echo) that emerge from various portions of the nasal cavity. In patients where there is a question of etiology for nasal congestion or when trying to delineate which patient may be a candidate for a surgical intervention, rhinometry can provide additional data that confirms and localizes an obstruction.

Derangement of sense of smell is associated with a myriad of nasal/sinus/and other pathologies as well as topical and systemic medication use. Odor molecules bind an “odor-presenting intermediary,” and this complex activates olfactory neurons, with signal propagation to olfactory bulb, then on to the cerebrum, and ultimately the conscious “experience” of olfaction. A variety of scratch and sniff screening smell tests are commercially available for office use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thornton DJ, Rousseau K, McGuckin MA. Structure and function of the polymeric mucins in airways mucus. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:459–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rose MC, Voynow JA. Respiratory tract mucin genes and mucin glycoproteins in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2006;86:245–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Houtmeyers E, Gosselink R, Gayan RG, Decramer M. Regulation of mucociliary clearance in health and disease. Eur Respir J. 1999;13:1177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Voynow JA, Rubin BK. Mucins, mucus, and sputum. Chest. 2009;135(2):505–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wanner A, Salathe M, O’Riordan TG. Mucociliary clearance in the airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1868–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Satir P, Sleigh MA. The physiology of cilia and mucociliary interactions. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:137–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen NA. Sinonasal mucociliary clearance in health and disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2006;196:20–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naiboglu B, Deveci I, Kalaycik C, Daylan A, Habesoglu TE, Toros SZ, Deveci SE, Egeli E. Effect of nasolacrimal duct obstruction on nasal mucociliary transport. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;124:166–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clary-Meinesz CF, Cosson J, Huitorel P, Blaive B. Temperature effect on the ciliary beat frequency of human nasal and tracheal ciliated cells. Biol Cell. 1992;76:335–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirtsreesakul V, Somjareonwattana P, Ruttanaphol S. Impact of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity on nasal mucociliary clearance. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:801–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Atsuta S, Majima Y. Nasal mucociliary clearance of chronic sinusitis in relation to rheological properties of nasal mucus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;107:47–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Passali D, Feri R, Becchini G, Passali GC, Bellussi L. Alterations of nasal mucociliary transport in patients with hypertrophy of the inferior turbinates, deviations of the nasal septum and chronic sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256:335–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Majima Y, Sakakura Y, Matsabura T, Miyoshi Y. Possible mechanisms of reduction of nasal mucociliary clearance in chronic sinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1986;11:55–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Antunes MB, Cohen NA. Mucociliary clearance–a critical upper airway host defense mechanism and methods of assessment. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;7(1):5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stillwell PC, Wartchow EP, Sagel SD. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in children: a review for pediatricians, allergists, and pediatric pulmonologists. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2011;24:192–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kartagener M, Stucki P. Bronchiectasis with situs inversus. Arch Pediatr. 1962;79:193–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marthin JK, Petersen N, Skovgaard LT, Nielsen KG. Lung function in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: a cross sectional and 3-decade longitudinal study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:1262–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asai K, Haruna S, Otori N, Yanagi K, Fukami M, Moriyama H. Saccharin test of maxillary sinus mucociliary function after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:117–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brondeel L, Sonstabo R, Clement P, et al. Value of Tc-99m particle test and the saccharine test in mucociliary examinations. Rhinology. 1983;21:135.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun SS, Hsieh JF, Tsai SC, Ho YJ, Kao CH. The role of rhinoscintigraphy in the evaluation of nasal mucociliary clearance function in patients with sinusitis. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:1029–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Boeck K, Proesmans M, Mortelmans L, et al. Mucociliary transport using 99mtc-albumin colloid: a reliable screening test for primary ciliary dyskinesia. Thorax. 2005;60:414–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Afzelius BA. Cilia-related diseases. J Pathol. 2004;204:470–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwabe GC, Hoffmann K, Loges NT, Birker D, Rossier C, de Santi MM, Olbrich H, Fliegauf M, Failly M, Liebers U, Collura M, Gaedicke G, Mundlos S, Wahn U, Blouin JL, Niggemann B, Omran H, Antonarakis SE, Bartoloni L. Primary ciliary dyskinesia associated with normal axoneme ultrastructure is caused by DNAH11 mutations. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:289–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Armengot M, Bonet M, Carda C, Gómez MJ, et al. Development and validation of a method of cilia motility analysis for the early diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012;63:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Public domain, unattributable.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lenders H, Schaefer J, Pirsig W. Turbinate hypertrophy in habitual snorers and patients with obstructive sleep apnea: findings of acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(6 Pt 1):614–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jefferson Y. Mouth breathing: adverse effects on facial growth, health, academics, and behavior. Gen Dent. 2010;58(1):18–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laine MT, Warren DW. Perceptual and respiratory responses to added nasal airway resistance loads in older adults. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(4 Pt 1):425–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kase Y, Itimura K, Iinuma T. An evaluation of nasal patency with acoustic rhinometry, preoperative and postoperative comparisons. Nipon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993;96(2):197–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fouke J, Jackson A. Acoustic rhinometry: effects of decongestants and posture on nasal patency. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;119(4):371–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF, Elbrønd O. Turbinate hypertrophy. Evaluation of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(3):283–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Elbrønd O, Hilberg O, Felding JU, Blegvad Andersen O. Acoustic rhinometry used as a method to demonstrate changes in the volume of the nasopharynx after adenoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 1991;16(1):84–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lildholdt T. Surgical versus medical treatment of nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl. 1989;8:31–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lenders H, Pirsig W. Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared with normal controls. Rhinology. 1990;28(1):5–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lam DJ, James KT, Weaver EM. Comparison of anatomic, physiological, and subjective measures of the nasal airway. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20(5):463–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Numminen J, Ahtinen M, Huhtala H, Rautiainen M. Comparison of rhinometric methods to intranasal pathology. Rhinology. 2003;41(2):65–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vogt K, Zhang L. Airway assessment by four-phase rhinomanometry in septal surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mitchell J. Big yellow taxi. Ladies of the canyon. Warner Brothers, July 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McLaughlin N. Odor identification deficits in frontotemporal dementia: a preliminary study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23(1):119–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alvin V, Silverstein R. Smell, the subtle sense. New York: William Morrow & Company; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Margot C. A noseful of objects. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(7):813–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. FDA advisory. Zicam cold remedy nasal products (Cold remedy nasal gel, cold remedy nasal swabs, and cold remedy swabs, kids size), June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ackerman BH. Disturbances of taste and smell induced by drugs. Pharmacotherapy. 1997;17(3):482–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tuccori M. Drug-induced taste and smell alterations: a case/non-case evaluation of an Italian database of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting. Drug Saf. 2011;34(10):849–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Westervelt HJ, Bruce JM, Coon WG, Tremont G. Odor identification in mild cognitive impairment subtypes. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008;30(2):151–6. (BSIT).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. London B, Nabet B, Fisher AR, White B, Sammel MD, Doty RL. Predictors of prognosis in patients with olfactory disturbance. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(2):159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jones RE, Bown CC, Ship JA. Odor identification in young and elderly African-Americans and Caucasians. Spec Care Dentist. 1995;15(4):138–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yousem DM, Maldjian JA, Hummel T, Alsop DC, Geckle RJ, Kraut MA, Doty RL. The effect of age on odor-stimulated functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(4):600–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Frye RE, Doty RL, Shaman P. Bilateral and unilateral olfactory sensitivity: relationship to handedness and gender. In: Doty RL, Müller-Schwartze D, editors. Chemical signals in vertebrates VI. New York: Plenum Press; 1992. p. 559–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Tomita H, Ikeda M. Clinical use of electrogustometry: strengths and limitations. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2002;546:27–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kern RC. Chronic sinusitis and anosmia: pathologic changes in the olfactory mucosa. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(7):1071–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Litvack JR, Mace JC, Smith TL. Olfactory function and disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(2):139–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Guss J, Doghramji L, Reger C, Chiu AG. Olfactory dysfunction in allergic rhinitis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71(5):268–72. Epub 2009 Sept 30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ghorbanian SN, Paradise JL, Doty RL. Odor perception in children in relation to nasal obstruction. Pediatrics. 1983;72(4):510–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Doty RL, Frye R. Influence of nasal obstruction on smell function. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1989;22(2):397–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Eichel BS. Improvement of olfaction following pansinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat Journal. 1994;73(4):248–50, 253.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Jiang RS, Lu FJ, Liang KL, Shiao JY, Su MC, Hsin CH, Chen WK. Olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(4):445–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Soler ZM, Hwang PH, Mace J, Smith TL. Outcomes after middle turbinate resection: revisiting a controversial topic. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(4):832–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sugiyama K, Matsuda T, Kondo H, Mitsuya S, Hashiba M, Murakami S, Baba S. Postoperative olfaction in chronic sinusitis: smokers versus nonsmokers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(11):1054–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Doty RL, Mishra A. Olfaction and its alteration by nasal obstruction, rhinitis, and rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(3):409–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton R. Dotson MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dotson, A.R., Incaudo, G.A. (2014). Direct or Objective Evaluation of Nasal Function: Nasal Mucosal Microscopy, Mucociliary Transport, Flow Rhinometry, Acoustic Rhinometry and Olfactory Assessment. In: Chang, C., Incaudo, G., Gershwin, M. (eds) Diseases of the Sinuses. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0265-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0265-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0264-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0265-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics