Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Normative data for a solution-based taste test

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was to study gustatory function in a large portion of the general population using liquid tastants, extending previous research. Further, we investigated the test–retest reliability of the test used. Data from 944 healthy subjects were used (498 women and 446 men, mean age 45 years; age range 5–90 years). For lateralized assessment of gustatory function, liquid taste solutions were used with different concentrations of each tastant (sweet 0.03, 0.1, 0.4, 2 g/mL sucrose solution; sour 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 mL citric acid; salty 0.025, 0.075, 0.15, 0.36 mL sodium chloride solution; bitter 0.0002, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.01 mL quinine hydrochloride). A drop (approximately 20 µL) of liquid tastant was applied on the right side or on the left side of the anterior/posterior third of the extended tongue. The taste test had a good test–retest reliability r 304 = 0.78 (P < 0.001) for the total score and r 304 = 0.77 (P < 0.001) for the right-sided measures and r 304 = 0.75 (P < 0.001) for the left-sided measures, respectively. Gustatory sensitivity was found to decrease with age; women were more sensitive to gustatory stimuli than men. Irrespective of the sex-related differences, the total score at the 10th percentile was 28 in subjects younger than 15 years, 26.1 for ages from 16 to 35 years, 25 for ages from 36 to 55 years, and 24 for subjects older than 56 years of age. In conclusion, this test is recommended for clinical assessment of the ability to taste. The test provides reliable data, which is easy to handle, inexpensive, timesaving and can be self-made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1980) Communication. Working group for “clinical olfactology and gustology”. Recommendations for assessments of the sense of smell and taste. HNO-Praxis 5:62–67

  2. Ahne G, Erras A, Hummel T, Kobal G (2000) Assessment of gustatory function by means of tasting tablets. Laryngoscope 110:1396–1401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartoshuk L (1989) Clinical evaluation of the sense of taste. Ear Nose Throat 68:331–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrashekar J, Hoon MA, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS (2006) The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 444:288–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984) Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32:489–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukunaga A, Uematsu H, Sugimoto K (2005) Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gudziol H, Hummel T (2007) Normative values for the assessment of gustatory function using liquid tastants. Acta Otolarnygol 127:658–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hummel T, Erras A, Kobal G (1997) A test for screening of taste function. Rhinology 35:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Just T, Homoth J, Graumüller S, Pau HW (2003) Taste disorders and recovery of the taste function after middle ear surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 82:494–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, Seeber H, Pauli E, Hummel T (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and odor thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krarup B (1959) Electrogustometry: a new method for clinical taste examination. Acta Otolaryngol 49:294–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A, Bende M, Mueller CA, Nordin S, Hummel T (2009) “Taste Strips”—a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuda T, Doty R (1995) Regional taste sensitivity to NACL: relationship to subject age, tongue locus and area of stimulation. Chem Senses 20:283–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, Stiassny K, Temmel AF, Hummel T, Kobal G (2003) Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated “taste strips”. Rhinology 41:2–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy C, Quinonez C, Nordin S (1995) Reliability and validity of electrogustometry and its application to young and elderly persons. Chem Senses 20:499–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nordin S, Bramerson A, Bringlov E, Kobal G, Hummel T, Bende M (2007) Substance and tongue-region specific loss in basic taste-quality identification in elderly adults. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomita H, Ikeda M (2002) Clinical use of electrogustometry: strengths and limitations. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 27–38

  18. Tomita H, Ikeda M, Okuda Y (1986) Basis and practice of clinical taste examinations. Auris Nasus Larynx 13 (Suppl 1)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tino Just.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pingel, J., Ostwald, J., Pau, H.W. et al. Normative data for a solution-based taste test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1911–1917 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1276-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1276-1

Keywords

Navigation