Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-arterial methotrexate (MTX) infusion combined with uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and uterine curettage with that of UAE and curettage without MTX infusion for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Methods

In this retrospective study, data of CSP patients admitted from January 2011 to July 2015 were obtained from electronic patient records. Clinical information at baseline and after treatment were extracted and analyzed.

Results

A total of 93 CSP patients were included, with 57 patients receiving UAE followed by curettage (UC) and 36 patients receiving intra-arterial MTX infusion followed by UAE and curettage (MUC). The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. Without additional intervention, 32 (88.9%) patients were successfully treated by MUC, and 49 (86.0%) patients were successfully treated by UC, defined by discontinued ectopic conceptus growth, normalized serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level, ceased vaginal bleeding and preservation of uterus, with no significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, intra-operative blood loss volume and post-operative bleeding events were not significantly different between the two groups. However, serum β-hCG decline on the first day after surgery was significantly promoted, and the hospitalization length and the time needed for serum β-hCG normalization were significantly shortened by addition of intra-arterial MTX infusion.

Conclusions

Adding intra-arterial MTX to UAE and curettage significantly promoted post-operative recovery, though success rate and bleeding events were not significantly affected, suggesting that addition of intra-arterial MTX might not be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang H, Li S, Ma Z, Jia Y (2016) Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293:819–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu W, Shen L, Wang Q, Wang W, Sun Z (2016) Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kong D, Dong X, Qi Y (2015) Ultrasonography-guided multidrug stratification interventional therapy for cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker VL, Srinivas M (2016) Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One 11:e0148343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang JH, Qian ZD, Zhuang YL, Du YJ, Zhu LH, Huang LL (2013) Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 123:240–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanat-Pektas M, Bodur S, Dundar O, Bakir VL (2016) Systematic review: what is the best first-line approach for cesarean section ectopic pregnancy? Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 55:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira N, Elias RT (2016) Conservative management of cesarean scar pregnancy following diagnosis via magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:520–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng P, Gui T, Liu X, Chen W, Liu Z (2015) Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:137–142

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin X, Su S, Dong B, Ban Y, Li C, Sun B (2012) Angiographic uterine artery chemoembolization followed by vacuum aspiration: an efficient and safe treatment for managing complicated cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1313–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:14–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang CB, Tseng CJ (2006) Primary evacuation therapy for cesarean scar pregnancy: three new cases and review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:222–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deans R, Abbott J (2010) Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 93:1735–1740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qian ZD, Huang LL, Zhu XM (2015) Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1055–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu X, Xue X, Wu X, Lin R, Yuan Y, Wang Q, Xu C, He Y, Hu W (2014) Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:2793–2803

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lan W, Hu D, Li Z, Wang L, Yang W, Hu S (2013) Bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization combined with dilation and curettage for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a method for preserving the uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39:1153–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng Y, Chen S, Li C, Zhang X, Duan H, Sooranna S, Johnson MR, Li J (2016) Curettage after uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy. Exp Ther Med 12:1469–1475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Qi F, Zhou W, Wang MF, Chai ZY, Zheng LZ (2015) Uterine artery embolization with and without local methotrexate infusion for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54:376–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadeghi H, Rutherford T, Rackow BW, Campbell KH, Duzyj CM, Guess MK, Kodaman PH, Norwitz ER (2010) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: case series and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 27:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cottier JP, Fignon A, Tranquart F, Herbreteau D (2002) Uterine necrosis after arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 100:1074–1077

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Godfrey CD, Zbella EA (2001) Uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 98:950–952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tulpin L, Morel O, Malartic C, Barranger E (2009) Conservative management of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Cases J 2:7794

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81601238), and Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and family planning (20164Y0251).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Planning, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China

    Ling Gao, Yan-yan Hou, Feng Sun, Wei Xia, Yi Yang & Qin-fang Chen

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, 201214, China

    Xiao-cui Li

  3. The Second Clinical Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300270, China

    Tian Tian

Authors
  1. Ling Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan-yan Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tian Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qin-fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiao-cui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LG: collected and analyzed the data, drafted the manuscript; YYH: collected the data and analyzed the data; FS: analyzed the data and reviewed the draft; WX: analyzed the data; YY: prepared figures and tables; TT: prepared figures; QFC: supervised the study, reviewed and edited the manuscript; XCL: designed the study, supervised the study, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qin-fang Chen or Xiao-cui Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they had no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study before treatment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, L., Hou, Yy., Sun, F. et al. A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297, 1205–1211 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4686-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4686-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation