Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with curettage and methotrexate (MTX) plus curettage in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Methods

From January 2005 to December 2013, we treated 38 CSP patients with UAE combined with curettage, and another 26 patients with CSP were treated with methotrexate (MTX) plus curettage. The resulting data were analyzed statistically.

Results

The median volume of blood loss was 17.5 ml in the UAE combined with curettage (UAE-C) group vs. 335 ml in the MTX plus curettage (MTX-C) group (p < 0.001). The time from the procedure till β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) concentration returned to normal was 25.13 ± 3.74 days in the UAE-C group vs. 56.15 ± 15.99 days in the MTX-C group (p < 0.001). The duration of hospitalization was 7.44 ± 1.92 vs. 19.38 ± 8.75 days, respectively (p < 0.001). The percentage of side effects in the UAE-C group was significantly lower than in the MTX-C group.

Conclusions

UAE combined with curettage appears to be superior to MTX plus curettage for treatment of CSP with high serum β-hCG level, though prospective trials are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M (2006) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 107:1373–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Litwicka K, Greco E (2011) Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23:415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang XB, Zhong YC, Chi JC et al (2012) Caesarean scar pregnancy: treatment with bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization combined with dilation and curettage. J Int Med Res 40:1919–1930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lian F, Wang Y, Chen W et al (2012) Uterine artery embolization combined with local methotrexate and systemic methotrexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with different ultrasonographic pattern. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:286–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia Wu, Xuebin Zhang, Jie Zhu et al (2012) Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 161:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang XY, Yu H, Li KM et al (2010) Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117:990–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao S, Zhu L, Lin L et al (2014) Uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy: safe and effective intervention. Chin Med J (Engl) 127(12):2322–2326

    Google Scholar 

  8. Özkan S, Çaliskan E, Özeren S et al (2007) Three-dimensional ultrasonographic diagnosis and hysteroscopic management of a vialle cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 33:873–877

    Google Scholar 

  9. Litwicka K, Greco E (2013) Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25(6):456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosni MM, Herath RP, Mumtaz R (2014) Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 69:261–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Mello NM, Mol F, Ankum WM et al (2012) Ectopic pregnancy: how the diagnostic and therapeutic management has changed. Fertil Steril 98:1066–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guvenag Guven ES, Dilbaz S, Dilbaz B et al (2010) Comparison of single and multiple dose methotrexate therapy for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muraji M, Mabuchi S, Hisamoto K et al (2009) Cesarean scar pregnancies successfully treated with methotrexate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:720–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bayoglu Tekin Y, Mete Ural U, Balık G et al (2014) Management of cesarean scar pregnancy with suction curettage: a report of four cases and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1171–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Garmel S (2003) Successful term pregnancy after bilateral uterine artery embolization for postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 102:603–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcus S, Cheng E, Goff B (1999) Extrauterine pregnancy resulting from early uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 94:804–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qian ZD, Huang LL, Zhu XM (2015) Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1055–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao L, Huang Z, Gao J et al (2014) Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 127:147–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Xu B, Dai S et al (2011) An efficient conservative treatment modality for cervical pregnancy: angiographic uterine artery embolization followed by immediate curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.048

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013) Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 100:638–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oron G, Tulandi T (2013) A pragmatic and evidence-based management of ectopic pregancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:446–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomislav S, Josip M, Liana CS et al (2011) Uterine artery embolization as nonsurgical treatment of uterine myomas. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011:489281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zakaria MA, Abdallah ME, Shavell VI et al (2011) Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy: utility of uterine artery embolization. Fertil Steril 95:872–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ben Naqi J, Helmy S, Ofili-Yebovi D et al (2007) Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Hum Reprod 22:2012–2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maymon R, Svirsky R, Smorgick N et al (2011) Fertility performance and obstetric outcomes among women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 30:1179–1184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamaguchi M, Honda R, Uchino K et al (2014) Transvaginal methotrexate injection for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and subsequent fecundity. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.024

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang B, Jiang ZB, Huang MS et al (2012) Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: results of a case series and review of the literature. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1582–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Science and Technology Research Projects of the Population and Family Planning Commission of Shandong, China (no. 9 2012;) and by funds from the Shandong Science and Technology Development Plans (2013GSF11907 and 2014GGH218027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 324 Jingwu Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Wei Liu & Liang Shen

  2. Department of Interventional Radiology, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, 324 Jingwu Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Qingwen Wang & Zengtao Sun

  3. Department of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

    Wei Wang

Authors
  1. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qingwen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zengtao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Shen, L., Wang, Q. et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 71–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3952-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3952-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation