Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Short- and long-term effects of single and repetitive glove occlusion on the epidermal barrier

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the occlusive effects of glove materials (polyvinyl chloride, natural rubber latex) on epidermal barrier function and to relate the findings to the definitions of wet work in the current German ordinance on hazardous substances (2007) and in the German technical regulations on hazardous substances (TRGS 401; 2008). Short-term effects of wearing gloves once for 4 h, as well as the long-term effects of wearing gloves for 4 h daily for 7 days were assessed in a group of 20 healthy volunteers using non-invasive methods (transepidermal water loss (TEWL), capacitance, skin colour, skin surface pH). Data were collected 30 min and 3 h after single use, as well as 1 day after a 1-week application. TEWL and capacitance data showed hyperhydration of the horny layer 30 min after a 4-h occlusion as compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Three hours later, full recovery to basal values was observed. Additionally, a significant long-term effect after daily occlusion for 4 h for 7 days could not be demonstrated. In current literature, there is controversial evidence concerning the effects of glove occlusion. This study could not verify significant damage to skin barrier after 7 days of repeated occlusion 4 h daily in healthy volunteers. These findings require further discussion regarding the definitions in the current German ordinance on hazardous substances and in the TRGS 401.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agache P (2004) Assessment of erythema and pallor. In: Agache P, Humbert P (eds) Measuring the skin. Springer, Berlin, pp 591–601

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agache P (2004) Presentation of the skin surface ecosystem. In: Agache P, Humbert P (eds) Measuring the skin. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agner T, Serup J (1993) Time course of occlusive effects on skin evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Contact Dermatitis 28:6–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berardesca E, Group EEMCO (1997) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 3:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Convention 170 of international labour organization (ILO) (1990) Safety in the use of chemicals at work. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/safework/ cis/products/safetytm/c170.htm. Accessed 15 November 2008

  6. Cross SE, Roberts MS (2000) The effect of occlusion on epidermal penetration of parabens from a commercial allergy test ointment, acetone and ethanol vehicles. J Invest Dermatol 115:914–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. EU directives 98/24/EC (1998) Chemical agents at work. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1998:131:0011:0023:EN:PDF. Accessed 15 November 2008

  8. Fischer T, Greif C, Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P (1998) Instrumentelle methoden zur bewertung der sicherheit und wirksamkeit von kosmetika. Aktuelle Derm 24:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, Fuchs S, Praessler J, Norgauer J, Grieshaber R, Kleesz P, Elsner P (2005) Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo. Br J Dermatol 153:125–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fluhr JW, Lazzerini S, Distante F, Gloor M, Berardesca E (1999) Effects of prolonged occlusion on stratum corneum barrier function and water holding capacity. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 12:193–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friebe K, Effendy I, Löffler H (2003) Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate. Br J Dermatol 148:65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A, Wilhelm K-P, Takiwaki H, Serup J (1996) Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report of the standardization group of the European society of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 35:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fullerton A, Serup J (1997) Site, gender and age variation in normal skin colour on the back and the forearm: tristimulus colorimeter measurements. Skin Res Technol 3:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabard B, Treffel P (2004) Transepidermal water loss. In: Agache P, Humbert P (eds) Measuring the skin. Springer, Berlin, pp 553–564

    Google Scholar 

  15. German ordinance on hazardous substances (Gefahrstoffverordnung; GefStoffV); January 1st, 2005; last amended March 3rd, (2007). http://www.baua.de. Accessed 15 November 2008

  16. Graves CJ, Edwards C, Marks R (1995) The effect of protective gloves on stratum corneum barrier properties. Contact Dermatitis 33:183–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanau A, Stücker M, Gambichler T, Orlikov A, Hoffmann K, Altmeyer P, Freitag M (2003) Nichtinvasive diagnostik von hautfunktionen. Hautarzt 54:1211–1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jungbauer FHW, Van der Harst JJ, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ (2004) Skin protection in nursing work: promoting the use of gloves and hand alcohol. Contact Dermatitis 51:135–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kligman AM (1996) Hydration injury to human skin. In: Van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kütting B, Diepgen T, Schmid K, Drexler H (2005) Überlegungen zu notwendigen Konsequenzen für arbeitsmedizinische Vorsorgeuntersuchungen durch die Novellierung der Gefahrstoffverordnung am Beispiel der Vorsorgeuntersuchungen für Hauterkrankungen und obstruktive Atemwegserkrankungen. Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin 40:308–312

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matsumura H, Oka K, Umekage K, Akita H, Kawai J, Kitazawa Y, Suda S, Tsubota K, Ninomiya Y, Hirai H, Miyata K, Morikubo K, Nakagawa M, Okada T, Kawai K (1995) Effect of occlusion on human skin. Contact Dermatitis 33:231–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirza R, Maani N, Liu C, Kim J, Rehmus W (2006) A randomized, controlled, double-blind study of the effect of wearing coated pH 5, 5 latex gloves compared with standard powder-free latex gloves on skin pH, transepidermal water loss and skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 55:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parra JL, Paye M, EEMCO Group (2003) EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin surface pH. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 16:188–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pinnagoda J (1994) Hardware and measuring principles: evaporimeter. In: Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: water and the stratum corneum. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J (1990) Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. Contact Dermatitis 22:164–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramsing DW, Agner T (1996) Effect of glove occlusion on human skin. I. Short-term experimental exposure. Contact Dermatitis 34:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramsing DW, Agner T (1996) Effect of glove occlusion on human skin. II. Long-term experimental exposure. Contact Dermatitis 34:258–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rogiers V, EEMCO Group (2001) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 14:117–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schäfer P, Bewick-Sonntag C, Capri MG, Berardesca E (2002) Physiological changes in skin barrier function in relation to occlusion level, exposure time and climatic conditions. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 15:7–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. TRGS 401 (2008). http://www.baua.de. Accessed 15 November 2008)

  31. Tsai T-F, Maibach HI (1999) How irritant is water? An overview. Contact Dermatitis 41:311–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Warner RR, Stone KJ, Boissy YL (2003) Hydration disrupts human stratum corneum ultrastructure. J Invest Dermatol 120:275–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilhelm K-P, Cua AB, Wolff HH, Maibach HI (1993) Surfactant-induced stratum corneum hydration in vivo: prediction of the irritation potential of anionic surfactants. J Invest Dermatol 101:310–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wulfhorst B, Schwanitz HJ, Bock M (2004) Optimizing skin protection with semipermeable gloves. Dermatitis 15:184–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhai H, Maibach HI (2002) Occlusion vs. skin barrier function. Skin Res Technol 8:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhai H, Maibach HI (2001) Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 44:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, Sedanstrasse 115, 49090, Osnabrueck, Germany

    Ulrike Wetzky, Meike Bock, Britta Wulfhorst & Swen Malte John

Authors
  1. Ulrike Wetzky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meike Bock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Britta Wulfhorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Swen Malte John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Wetzky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wetzky, U., Bock, M., Wulfhorst, B. et al. Short- and long-term effects of single and repetitive glove occlusion on the epidermal barrier. Arch Dermatol Res 301, 595–602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-009-0980-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-009-0980-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation