Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased accuracy in component positioning using an image-less robotic arm system in primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) and navigated total knee arthroplasty (NTKA) have shown improved knee alignment and reduced radiographic outliers. Recent studies have proven that conventional mechanical alignment may not be the optimal goal for every patient. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the planned implant positioning of a novel image-less robotic technique with an established navigated technique (NTKA).

Method

The study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data that compared the implant positioning and lower-limb alignment of 86 image-less RTKA with 86 image-less NTKA. Radiographic analysis was performed to evaluate the lower-limb overall alignment, femoral and tibial components positioning in the coronal and sagittal planes. Outliers were evaluated with a cutoff of ± 3°.

Results

No difference was noted between the two groups for radiographic outliers within ± 3° from neutral (p = 0.098). The mean hip–knee–ankle angle deviation from target was 1.3° in the RTKA group compared to 1.9° in the NTKA (p < 0.001). Femoral sagittal deviation (femoral component flexion) was smaller in the RTKA group (0.9° vs 1.9°; p < 0.001). Similarly, tibial coronal deviation (0.8° vs 1.5°; p < 0.001) and tibial sagittal deviation (tibial slope) were smaller in the RTKA group compared to the NTKA group (0.9° vs 1.7°; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The RTKA group reported a substantial and significant reduced error from the planned target angles for both tibial and femoral components. No difference in terms of radiographic outliers was noted between navigation and robotic assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J et al (2017) Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 32:3854–3860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen CL, Hooper GJ, Oram BJ, Wells JE (2014) Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function? Int Orthop 38(2):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1996-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mancino F, Cacciola G, Malahias MA et al (2020) What are the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty over conventional manual total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative studies. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 12(Suppl 1):8657. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(4):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.67B4.4030849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA (1985) Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(6):754–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O (1988) Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moser LB, Hess S, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05417-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hess S, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05506-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirschmann MT, Hess S, Behrend H, Amsler F, Leclercq V, Moser LB (2019) Phenotyping of hip-knee-ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05507-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S (2019) Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05508-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S (2019) Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05509-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J (2007) Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c0c0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckardt A (2004) Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):573–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL (2013) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA [published correction appears in Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2627]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaidya NV, Deshpande AN, Panjwani T, Patil R, Jaysingani T, Patil P (2020) Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06353-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boylan M, Suchman K, Vigdorchik J, Slover J, Bosco J (2018) Technology-assisted hip and knee arthroplasties: an analysis of utilization trends. J Arthroplasty 33(4):1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S (2021) Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y. (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34255173)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Parratte S, Price AJ, Jeys LM, Jackson WF, Clarke HD (2019) Accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 34(11):2799–2803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi SMP, Sangaletti R, Perticarini L, Terragnoli F, Benazzo F (2022) High accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31(3):1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06800-8

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Oussedik S, Moriarty PD, Haddad FS (2020) A prospective double-blinded randomised control trial comparing robotic arm-assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Trials 21(1):194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4123-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Karachalios T, Komnos GA (2020) Individualized surgery in primary total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 5(10):663–671. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190085

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Scuderi GR, Fallaha M, Masse V, Lavigne P, Amiot LP, Berthiaume MJ (2014) Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Orthop Clin North Am 45(2):167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.11.002. (Epub 2014 Jan 16 PMID: 24684910)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research [published correction appears in J Chiropr Med. 2017 Dec;16(4):346]. J Chiropr Med. 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML (2013) Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ (1998) Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199811000-00008. (PMID: 9917666)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehta N, Burnett RA, Kahlenberg CA, Miller R, Chalmers B, Cross MB (2022) Mid-flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty: diagnosis, implant design, and outcomes. Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20220719-01. (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35876775)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. D’Lima DD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200111000-00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA, White SE (1999) The effect of varus tilt on contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. Orthopedics 22(3):303–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ (2005) The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 38(2):349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A (2014) What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop 85(5):480–487. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.940573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Mancino F, Rossi SMP, Sangaletti R et al (2022) A new robotically assisted technique can improve outcomes of total knee arthroplasty comparing to an imageless navigation system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04560-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahoney O, Kinsey T, Sodhi N et al (2020) Improved component placement accuracy with robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 31]. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R et al (2018) Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 23(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SMPR and FB designed the study. FB, SMPR and FT performed the surgeries. FM, RS and MC collected the data. FM and SMPR performed radiographic analysis. FM drafted the manuscript. SMPR critically revised it. FB gave the final approval before submission. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Prof. Francesco Benazzo declares a teaching contract with the manufacturer (Zimmer Biomet); Dr. Fabio Mancino received a research grant from the manufacturer (Zimmer Biomet); the funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript; all other authors declare no conflict of interest related to the present study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. All patients signed an informed consent for the surgical procedure.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mancino, F., Rossi, S.M.P., Sangaletti, R. et al. Increased accuracy in component positioning using an image-less robotic arm system in primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 393–404 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05062-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05062-y

Keywords

Navigation