Skip to main content
Log in

Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Coronal alignment of the knee is defined by the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), the femoral mechanical angle (FMA), the tibial mechanical angle (TMA), and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA). To date, there is still a lack of knowledge about the variability of native coronal knee alignment. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of the current literature about the variability of coronal knee alignment (HKA, FMA, TMA, and JLCA) in non-osteoarthritic knees.

Methods

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to search date (November 1, 2018) and screened for relevant studies. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported the coronal alignment of the native, non-osteoarthritic knee.

Results

A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies performed the measurements on weight-bearing long-leg standing radiographs (LLR), one study used MRI, and one study used the EOS imaging system. The mean HKA ranged from 176.7° ± 2.8° (male) to 180.7° (female). The mean FMA ranged from 92.08° ± 1.78° (female) to 97.2° ± 2.7° (female). The mean TMA ranged from 84.6° ± 2.5° (female) to 89.6° (female). The mean JLCA ranged from − 0.47° ± 0.98° (male) to − 1.9° ± 1.4° (female).

Conclusion

This systematic review provides a detailed overview about the variability of the coronal knee alignment in non-osteoarthritic knees. The broad variability of all coronal alignment parameters highlights the necessity for a more anatomic and individualized approach in knee arthroplasty. It also offers the fundament to understand the changes in osteoarthritic knees.

Level of clinical evidence

Systematic review, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HKA:

Hip–knee–ankle angle

FMA:

Femoral mechanical angle

TMA:

Tibial mechanical angle

JLCA:

Joint line convergence angle

LLR:

Long-leg radiographs

MRI:

Magnet resonance imaging

CT:

Computed tomography

References

  1. Altman RD, Fries JF, Bloch DA, Carstens J, Cooke TD, Genant H et al (1987) Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 30:1214–1225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan P (1997) Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 5:39–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooke TD, Li J, Scudamore RA (1994) Radiographic assessment of bony contributions to knee deformity. Orthop Clin North Am 25:387–393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deep K (2014) Collateral ligament laxity in knees: what is normal? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3426–3431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirschmann MT, Behrend H (2018) Functional knee phenotypes: a call for a more personalised and individualised approach to total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4973-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:629–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA (1985) Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA (1985) Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jabalameli M, Moghimi J, Yeganeh A, Nojomi M (2015) Parameters of lower extremities alignment view in Iranian adult population. Acta Med Iran 53:293–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khattak MJ, Umer M, Davis ET, Habib M, Ahmed M (2010) Lower-limb alignment and posterior tibial slope in Pakistanis: a radiographic study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:22–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lampart M, Behrend H, Moser LB, Hirschmann MT (2018) Due to great variability fixed HKS angle for alignment of the distal cut leads to a significant error in coronal TKA orientation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5041-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luyckx T, Zambianchi F, Catani F, Bellemans J, Victor J (2013) Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2331–2337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maini L, Singh S, Kushwaha NS, Saini A, Rohilla S, Sharma H et al (2015) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity in Indian adult males. J Arthrosc Jt Surg 2:128–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee–the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:583–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mullaji AB, Marawar SV, Mittal V (2009) A comparison of coronal plane axial femoral relationships in Asian patients with varus osteoarthritic knees and healthy knees. J Arthroplasty 24:861–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Hashimura M, Takayama K, Ishida K, Araki D et al (2016) Coronal lower limb alignment in normal knees–a radiographic analysis of 797 normal knee subjects. Knee 23:209–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nam D, Shah RR, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2014) Evaluation of the 3-dimensional, weight-bearing orientation of the normal adult knee. J Arthroplasty 29:906–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Bhayde S, Nha KW, Oh HK (2014) Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination. Knee 21:544–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Slevin O, Hirschmann A, Schiapparelli FF, Amsler F, Huegli RW, Hirschmann MT (2018) Neutral alignment leads to higher knee society scores after total knee arthroplasty in preoperatively non-varus patients: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1602–1609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Slevin O, Schmid FA, Schiapparelli FF, Rasch H, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2017) Coronal femoral TKA position significantly influences in vivo patellar loading in unresurfaced patellae after primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3605–3610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Song MH, Yoo SH, Kang SW, Kim YJ, Park GT, Pyeun YS (2015) Coronal alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in korean females. Knee Surg Relat Res 27:49–55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka T, Takayama K, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Hayashi S, Kuroda R et al (2017) Radiographic analysis of the lower limbs using the hip-calcaneus line in healthy individuals and in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee 24:1146–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY (2000) Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82-A:1603–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Than P, Szuper K, Somoskeoy S, Warta V, Illes T (2012) Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system. Int Orthop 36:1291–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:393–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Paternostre F, Koch P (2014) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2995–3002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no financial conflict of interest with regards to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LBM participated in study design, literature review, data collection, figures and tables, and manuscript writing. SH participated in literature review, data collection, and manuscript editing. FA participated in study design and manuscript editing. HB participated in study design and manuscript editing. MTH participated in study design and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas B. Moser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required as this is a pure review of the literature not involving humans nor animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moser, L.B., Hess, S., Amsler, F. et al. Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1359–1367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05417-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05417-2

Keywords

Navigation