Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability of Tönnis classification in early hip arthritis: a useless reference for hip-preserving surgery

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Tönnis classification is widely accepted for grading hip arthritis, but its usefulness as a reference in hip-preserving surgery is yet to be demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate reproducibility of the Tönnis classification in early stages of hip osteoarthritis, and thus determine whether it is a reliable reference for hip-preserving surgery.

Materials and methods

Three orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of experience examined 117 hip X-rays that were randomly mixed of two groups: a group of 31 candidates for hip-preserving surgery and a control group of 30 patients that were asymptomatic with respect to the hip joint. The surgeons were asked to rate an eventual osteoarthritis according to the Tönnis classification. After 2 months, the surgeons were asked to re-evaluate the X-rays in a random order. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated by comparing the observers’ two estimations using Kappa statistics.

Results

Kappa values for interobserver reliability were slight or fair (range 0.173–0.397). Kappa values for intraobserver reproducibility were fair (range 0.364–0.397). Variance in grading no and slight osteoarthritis was the most frequent cause for intra- and interobserver disagreements (76.3 and 73.01 % of the non-concordant observations, respectively). The confidence interval analysis showed that the observers’ experience did not affect reproducibility.

Conclusions

The Tönnis classification is a poor method to assess early stages of hip osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that its routine use in therapeutic decision-making for conservative hip surgery should be reconsidered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogunovic L, Gottlieb M, Pashos G, Baca G, Clohisy JC (2013) Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2523–2529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrd JW, Jones KS (2010) Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:741–746

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Domb BG, Gui C, Lodhia P (2015) How much arthritis is too much for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:520–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Domb BG, Linder D, Finley Z, Botser IB, Chen A, Williamson J, Gupta A (2015) Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients aged 50 years or older compared with a matched-pair control of patients aged 30 years or younger. Arthroscopy 31:231–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horisberger M, Brunner A, Herzog RF (2010) Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement of the hip: a new technique to access the joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:182–190

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamath AF, Componovo R, Baldwin K, Israelite CL, Nelson CL (2009) Hip arthroscopy for labral tears. Review of clinical outcomes with 4.8-year mean follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:1721–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Larson CM, Giveans MR, Taylor M (2011) Does arthroscopic FAI correction improve function with radiographic arthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1667–1676

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Skendzel JG, Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Goljan P (2014) The effect of joint space on midterm outcomes after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 42:1127–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA (2008) Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1633–1644

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brückl R, Hepp WR, Tönnis D (1972) Eine Abgrenzung normaler und dysplastischer Hüftgelenke durch den Hüftwert. Arch Orthop and Trauma Surg 74:13–32

    Google Scholar 

  11. Busse J, Gasteiger W, Tönnis D (1972) Eine neue Methode zur röntgenologischen Beurteilung eines Hüftgelenkes—Der Hüftwert. Arch Orthop and Trauma Surg 72:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PL, Millis M (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:666–675

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gedouin JE, May O, Bonin N et al (2010) Assessment of arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. A prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96 (Supl):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haviv B, O’Donnell J (2010) The incidence of total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritic patients. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2:18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim KC, Hwang DS, Lee CH, Kwon ST (2007) Influence of femoroacetabular impingement on results of hip arthroscopy in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456:128–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, Kim Y, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):47–66

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1747–1770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nepple JJ, Martell JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Millis MB, Podeszwa DA, Sucato DJ, Sink EL, Clohisy JC, ANCHOR Study Group (2014) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements. Am J Sports Med 42:2393–2401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Croft P, Cooper C, Wickham C, Coggon D (1990) Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 132:514–522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lane NEE, Nevitt MC, Hochberg MC, Hung YY, Palermo L (2004) Progression of radiographic hip osteoarthritis over eight years in a community sample of elderly white women. Arthritis Rheum 50:1477–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright AA, Cook C, Abbott JH (2009) Variables associated with the progression of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 61:925–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vignon E, Conrozier T, Piperno M, Richard S, Carrillon Y, Fantino O (1999) Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Recommendations: recommended guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7:434–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Resnick D, Niwayama G, Coutt D (1977) Subchondral cysts (Geodes) in arthritic disorders: pathologic and radiographic appearance of the hip joint. Am J Roentgenol 128:799–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Günther KP, Sun Y (1999) Reliability of radiographic assessment in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7:239–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pitt MJ, Graham AR, Shipman JH, Birkby W (1982) Herniation Pit of the Femoral Neck. AJR 138:1115–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goker B, Sancak A, Arac M, Shott S, Block JA (2003) The radiographic joint space width in clinically normal hips: effects of age, gender and physical parameters. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11:328–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goker B, Sancak A, Haznedaroglu S, Arac M, Block JA (2005) The effects of minor hip flexion, abduction or adduction and X-ray beam angle on the radiographic joint space width of the hip. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13:379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Altman RD, Bloch DA, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Lohmder S, Pavelka K, Spector T, Vignon E (2004) Measurement of structural progresssion in osteoarthritis of the hip: the Barcelona consensus group. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:515–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pogrund H, Bloom R, Mogle P (1983) The normal width of the adult hip joint: the relationship to age, sex, and obesity. Skeletal Radiol 10:10–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Reijman M, Hazes JMW, Koes BW, Verhagen AP, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA (2004) Validity, reliability, and applicability of seven definitions of hip osteoarthritis used in epidemiological studies: a systematic appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis 63:226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ochoa LM, Dawson L, Patzkowski JC, Hsu JR (2010) Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in a young population with hip complaints is high. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2710–2714

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Hip Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Quintí, 89, 08026, Barcelona, Spain

    Marius Valera, Natalia Ibañez & Rogelio Sancho

  2. Parc de Salut Mar, Hip Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Marc Tey

Authors
  1. Marius Valera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalia Ibañez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rogelio Sancho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc Tey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Valera.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valera, M., Ibañez, N., Sancho, R. et al. Reliability of Tönnis classification in early hip arthritis: a useless reference for hip-preserving surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 27–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2356-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2356-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation