Skip to main content
Log in

First results with the Trochanter Fixation Nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A complication rate between 4–18% for the conventional osteosynthesis of the proximal femur fracture continues to be unacceptable even if increasing age and co-morbidity of patients are taken into account. Therefore, new intramedullary techniques are under development, and we here report our results with the novel trochanteric fixation nail (TFN). During the study period (March 2003–February 2004) all patients with a trochanteric fracture Type A1-A3 (AO/ASIF classification) were eligible for the study, and 120 patients (mean age 81 years, range 47–100; male/female 1:4) subsequently enrolled. Most frequent was the (according to the AO classification) A.2.1. type of fracture (n=39) and the A.2.2. fracture (n= 39). Operation time from cut to stitch was 45 mins (minimal 21/maximal 194). Thirty-seven (31%) postoperative X-rays were classified as very good, 60 (50%) as good, 18 (15%) as satisfying and five (4%) as bad post-reposition results according to the Garden Alignment Index. The clinical results were documented by the time of hospital stay, postoperative mobilization and time of rehabilitation compared to the old social status. Time to hospital discharge was 17 days (9 /25). Overall complication rate was 7.5% (9 patients) with 5.8% [7] local wound infection; 1.6% [2] cutting out of the helical blade through the cortex of the femoral head. We had three (2.5%) hospital deaths in our patient group. We conclude that TFN is a safe and reliable technique. Compared with techniques like PFN and Gamma-nail, clinical results are excellent with less complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M LA (2002) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 33(5):395–399

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1996) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9):1058–1064

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cleveland M BDM, Thompson F R, Hudson J, Wilson J, Ishizuka Tadao (1959) A ten year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 41-A:1399–1408

  4. Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Colombo-Benkmann M, Machens HG, Mieck U (1994) Gamma nail osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 4 years experiences and their consequences for further implant development. Chirurg 65(11):953–963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedl W, Krebs H, Krebs H LA (1990) The significance of individual patient characteristics for loading capacity and deformation of the proximal end of the femur. Unfallchirurg 93(8):364–371

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedl W (1987) The gliding nail. A new implant for complication-free primary load-bearing management of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Chirurg 58(2):106–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritz T, Hiersemann K, Krieglstein C, Friedl W (1999) Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119(1–2):1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Handoll HH, Parker MJ, Sherrington C (2003) Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane database syst rev 2003—CD001704

  9. Lenich A, Mayr E, Rüter A (2002) Hip replacement after failed internal fixation in patients with proximal femur fracture—a simple procedure? Zentralbl Chir 127(6):503–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nuber S, Schonweiss T, Rüter A (2003) Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN). Unfallchirurg 106(1):39–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cochrane library; Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2003) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. ochrane database syst. rev (1) CD000093

  12. Pauwels F (1973) Atlas zur Biomechanik der gesunden und kranken Hüfte. 1–269 pp

  13. Schurch MA, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, Vasey H, Michel JP, Bonjour JP (1996) A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 11(12):1935–1942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C (1999) The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30(5):327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner S, Rüter A (1999) Per- and subtrochanteric femur fractures. Unfallchirurg 102(3):206–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weise K, Schwab E (2001) Stabilization in treatment of per- and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Chirurg 72(11):1277–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Werner-Tutschku W, Lajtai G, Schmiedhuber G, Lang T, Pirkl C, Orthner E (2002) Intra- and perioperative complications in the stabilization of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures by means of PFN. Unfallchirurg 105(10):881–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kukla C, Heinz T, Gaebler C, Heinze G, Vecsei V (2001) The standard gamma nail: a critical analysis of 1000 cases. J Trauma 51(1):77–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lenich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lenich, A., Mayr, E., Rüter, A. et al. First results with the Trochanter Fixation Nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126, 706–712 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0117-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0117-6

Keywords

Navigation