Abstract
A complication rate between 4–18% for the conventional osteosynthesis of the proximal femur fracture continues to be unacceptable even if increasing age and co-morbidity of patients are taken into account. Therefore, new intramedullary techniques are under development, and we here report our results with the novel trochanteric fixation nail (TFN). During the study period (March 2003–February 2004) all patients with a trochanteric fracture Type A1-A3 (AO/ASIF classification) were eligible for the study, and 120 patients (mean age 81 years, range 47–100; male/female 1:4) subsequently enrolled. Most frequent was the (according to the AO classification) A.2.1. type of fracture (n=39) and the A.2.2. fracture (n= 39). Operation time from cut to stitch was 45 mins (minimal 21/maximal 194). Thirty-seven (31%) postoperative X-rays were classified as very good, 60 (50%) as good, 18 (15%) as satisfying and five (4%) as bad post-reposition results according to the Garden Alignment Index. The clinical results were documented by the time of hospital stay, postoperative mobilization and time of rehabilitation compared to the old social status. Time to hospital discharge was 17 days (9 /25). Overall complication rate was 7.5% (9 patients) with 5.8% [7] local wound infection; 1.6% [2] cutting out of the helical blade through the cortex of the femoral head. We had three (2.5%) hospital deaths in our patient group. We conclude that TFN is a safe and reliable technique. Compared with techniques like PFN and Gamma-nail, clinical results are excellent with less complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M LA (2002) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 33(5):395–399
Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1996) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9):1058–1064
Cleveland M BDM, Thompson F R, Hudson J, Wilson J, Ishizuka Tadao (1959) A ten year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 41-A:1399–1408
Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Colombo-Benkmann M, Machens HG, Mieck U (1994) Gamma nail osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 4 years experiences and their consequences for further implant development. Chirurg 65(11):953–963
Friedl W, Krebs H, Krebs H LA (1990) The significance of individual patient characteristics for loading capacity and deformation of the proximal end of the femur. Unfallchirurg 93(8):364–371
Friedl W (1987) The gliding nail. A new implant for complication-free primary load-bearing management of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Chirurg 58(2):106–112
Fritz T, Hiersemann K, Krieglstein C, Friedl W (1999) Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119(1–2):1–6
Handoll HH, Parker MJ, Sherrington C (2003) Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane database syst rev 2003—CD001704
Lenich A, Mayr E, Rüter A (2002) Hip replacement after failed internal fixation in patients with proximal femur fracture—a simple procedure? Zentralbl Chir 127(6):503–506
Nuber S, Schonweiss T, Rüter A (2003) Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN). Unfallchirurg 106(1):39–47
Cochrane library; Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2003) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. ochrane database syst. rev (1) CD000093
Pauwels F (1973) Atlas zur Biomechanik der gesunden und kranken Hüfte. 1–269 pp
Schurch MA, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, Vasey H, Michel JP, Bonjour JP (1996) A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 11(12):1935–1942
Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C (1999) The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30(5):327–332
Wagner S, Rüter A (1999) Per- and subtrochanteric femur fractures. Unfallchirurg 102(3):206–222
Weise K, Schwab E (2001) Stabilization in treatment of per- and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Chirurg 72(11):1277–1282
Werner-Tutschku W, Lajtai G, Schmiedhuber G, Lang T, Pirkl C, Orthner E (2002) Intra- and perioperative complications in the stabilization of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures by means of PFN. Unfallchirurg 105(10):881–885
Kukla C, Heinz T, Gaebler C, Heinze G, Vecsei V (2001) The standard gamma nail: a critical analysis of 1000 cases. J Trauma 51(1):77–83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenich, A., Mayr, E., Rüter, A. et al. First results with the Trochanter Fixation Nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126, 706–712 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0117-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0117-6