Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The treatment of trochanteric fractures with the use of gamma nails has become an established method. Despite the good and reliable results, some typical failures and complications may occur. It was our purpose to analyse the most common complications and their treatment options.

Materials and methods

A total of 498 patients were treated with a gamma nail from January 1992 until December 2001. There were 77% pertrochanteric, 10% subtrochanteric, 11% reversed pertrochanteric and 2% lateral femoral neck fractures. The patients’ mean age was 78.6 years (ranging from 29 to 98 years).

Results

There were a total of 78 general complications (16%) and implant-related complications in 8% (n=42). The most common complication was trochanteric pain necessitating removal of the gamma nail (n=30). Four patients fell after removal of the nail and sustained a neck fracture on the same side. Cut-out of the screw occurred in 19 patients. Sixteen of them had to be converted to a total hip replacement. Another 5 patients were converted to a total hip replacement because of pseudoarthrosis. During conversion to total hip replacements, the trochanter major refixation and length adjustment were the most problematic steps (intra- or postoperative dislocations necessitating anti-dislocation rings in three cases). Furthermore, cement extrusion at the femur and acetabulum occurred in 13 cases. Infections occurred in 3 patients. Five patients with a short gamma nail needed a conversion to a long gamma nail due to pseudoarthrosis (n=2) or femur fracture at the distal interlocking bolt (n=3). In addition, 7 patients sustained a distal femur fracture through the distal bolt, necessitating a plate osteosynthesis.

Conclusion

Most complications after gamma nail fixation can be prevented by following certain rules. The other inevitable problems can be dealt with either through a conversion to a total hip replacement, a re-osteosynthesis with a long gamma nail or an additional condylar plate. Conversion to total hip replacement may be a demanding operation with a higher than normal complication rate. Removal of the gamma nail should be performed cautiously as re-fractures can occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1 a-d
Fig. 2 a-d
Fig. 3 a-c
Fig. 4 a-c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2001) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic hip screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 15:394–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banan H, Al-Sabti A, Jimulia T, Hart AJ (2002) The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) - our first 60 cases. Injury 33:401–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgarten MR, Curtin SL, Lindkog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck A, Rüter A (1998) Schenkelhalsfrakturen - Diagnostik und therapeutisches Vorgehen. Unfallchirurg 101:634–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard AA, Brooks S (1987) The role of trochanteric wire revision after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:352–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bess RJ, Jolly SA (1997) Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. J South Orthop Assoc 6:173–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnaire F, Götschin U, Kuner EH (1992) Früh- und Spätergebnisse nach 200 DHS Osteosynthesen zur Versorgung pertrochanterer Femurfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 95:246–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boriani S, Bettelli G, Zmerly H (1991) Results of the multicentric Italien experience on the gamma nail. Orthopaedics 14:1307–1314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang WS, Zuckermann JD, Kummer FJ, Frankel VH (1987) Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic reduction versus medial displacement osteotomy in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop 225:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chevaley F, Gamba D (1997) Gamma nailing of peritrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: clinical results of a series of 63 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma 11:412–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dall DM, Miles AW (1983) Reattachment of the greater trochanter: the use of the trochanter cable grip system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:55–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis TRC, Sher JL, Horsman A (1990) Intertrochanteric femoral fractures: mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:26–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Docquier PL, Manche E, Autrique JC, Geulette B (2002) Complications associated with gamma nailing. A review of 439 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 68:251–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedl W, Colombo-Benkmann M, Dockter S, Machens HG, Mieck U (1994) Gammanagel-Osteosynthesen per- und subtrochanterer Femurfrakturen. Chirurg 65:953–963

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedl W, Göhring U, Fritz T (1998) Die Gleitnagelosteosynthese - Ein neues universell einsetzbares Implantat zur Versorgung per- und subtrochanterer Femurfrakturen. Chirurg 69:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritz T, Hiersemann K, Krieglstein C, Friedl W (1999) Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Halder SC (1992) The gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:340–344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martinez A, Cuenca J (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hesse B, Lampert C, Remiger A, Ebert T, Gächter A (2003) Die Versorgung trochanterer Frakturen mit dem Gammanagel. Unfallchirurg 106:281–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaiser W, Burmester J, Lacher V (1999) Zur Verfahrenswahl bei pertrochanteren Femurfrakturen. Unfallchirurgie 25:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kukla C, Heinz T, Gaebler C, Heinze G, Vecsei V (2001) The standard gamma nail: a critical analysis of 1000 cases. J Trauma 51:77–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kukla C, Pichl W, Prokesch R, Jacyniak W, Heinze G, Gatterer R, Heinz T (2001) Femoral neck fracture after removal of the standard gamma interlocking nail: a cadaveric study to determine factors influencing the biomechanical properties of the proximal femur. J Biomech 34:1519–1526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyle RF, Wright TM, Burstein AH (1980) Biomechanical analysis of the sliding characteristics of compression hip screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1308–1314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lacroix H, Arwert H, Snijders CJ, Fontijne WPJ (1995) Prevention of fracture at the distal locking site of the gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:274–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung KS, Chen CM, So WS, Sato K, Lai CH (1996) Multicenter trial of modified gamma nail in East Asia. Clin Orthop 323:146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW (1992) Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:345–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Falch JA, Meyer HE, Stensvold IS, Kristiansn IS, Nordsletten L (2001) More postoperative femoral fractures with the gamma nail than the sliding screw plate in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:252–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pavelka T, Kortus J, Linhart M (2003): Osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures using short proximal femoral nails. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 70:31–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK (1993) A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:789–793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rantanen J, Aro HT (1998) Intramedullary fixation of high subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a study comparing two implant designs, the gamma nail and the intramedullary hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12:249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, Hijden FH van der, Hoed PT den, Kerver AJ, Vugt AB van (2004) Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:86–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Smektala R, Luka M, Clasbrummel B (1999) Gibt es das universelle Implantat zur Versorgung trochanterer Femurfrakturen? Unfallchirurgie 25:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  33. Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG, Rueda D, Larrauri PM, Soler JJ (1998) Use of gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 350:56–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Winkelmann HP, Gersmann M, Gunselmann M (1996) Die operative Behandlung von hüftgelenksnahen Femurfrakturen beim alten Menschen im Wandel der letzten 20 Jahre. Akt Traumatol 26:73–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstr. 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Beatrix Hesse & Andrè Gächter

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Kantonales Spital Grabs, Spitalstrasse, 9472, Grabs, Switzerland

    Beatrix Hesse

Authors
  1. Beatrix Hesse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrè Gächter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatrix Hesse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hesse, B., Gächter, A. Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124, 692–698 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0744-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0744-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation