Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity and specificity of epithelial membrane antigen staining patterns in ependymomas

  • Short Original Communication
  • Published:
Acta Neuropathologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pattern and extent of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunoreactivity in ependymomas as compared to other glial tumors have only been investigated in small series. To determine sensitivity and specificity of EMA staining, 54 ependymomas were evaluated in comparison to 54 glioblastomas, 43 fibrillary astrocytomas and 21 oligodendrogliomas. Distinct punctate intracytoplasmic EMA immunoreactivity was observed in 48/54 ependymomas (89%), whereas ring-like EMA staining was observed in 17/54 ependymomas (31%). Apart from the absence in most myxopapillary ependymomas, neither staining pattern was related to tumor grade or localization. Dot-like EMA immunoreactivity was less frequently observed in glioblastomas [32/54 (59%), P<0.05 vs ependymomas], fibrillary astrocytomas [10/43 (23%), P<0.001 vs ependymomas] and oligodendrogliomas [2/21 (10%), P<0.001 vs ependymomas], whereas ring-like EMA staining was absent. Sensitivity and specificity of punctate EMA staining for the diagnosis of ependymoma as compared to other glial tumors were determined: A finding of 5 EMA dots/high-power field was associated with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 81%. The presence of ring-like EMA positive structures was less sensitive (32%), but highly specific (100%). To conclude, distinct punctate and ring-like EMA staining might serve as sensitive and specific markers of ependymal differentiation in glial tumors and, thus, may aid the diagnosis of ependymoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2. A

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruz-Sanchez FF, Rossi ML, Esiri MM, Reading M (1988) Epithelial membrane antigen expression in ependymomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 14:197–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cruz-Sanchez FF, Garcia-Bachs M, Rossi ML, Rodriguez-Prados S, Ferrer I, Coakham HB, Ferreres JC, Figols J, Palacin A (1992) Epithelial differentiation in gliomas, meningiomas and choroid plexus papillomas. Virchows Arch [B] 62:25–34

  3. Figarella-Branger D, Gambarelli D, Dollo C, Devictor B, Perez-Castillo AM, Genitori L, Lena G, Choux M, Pellissier JF (1991) Infratentorial ependymomas of childhood. Correlation between histological features, immunohistological phenotype, silver nucleolar organizer region staining values and post-operative survival in 16 cases. Acta Neuropathol 82:208–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirato J, Nakazato Y, Iijima M, Yokoo H, Sasaki A, Yokota M, Ono N, Hirato M, Inoue H (1997) An unusual variant of ependymoma with extensive tumor cell vacuolization. Acta Neuropathol 93:310–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hitchcock E, Morris CS (1987) Cross reactivity of anti-epithelial membrane antigen monoclonal for reactive and neoplastic glial cells. J Neurooncol 4:345–352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho DM, Hsu CY, Wong TT, Ting LT, Chiang H (2000) Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system: a comparative study with primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 99:482–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho KL, Caccamo DV, Garcia JH (1994) Intracytoplasmic lumina in ependymomas: an ultrastructural study. Ultrastruct Pathol 18:371–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaneko Y, Takeshita I, Matsushima T, Iwaki T, Tashima T, Fukui M (1990) Immunohistochemical study of ependymal neoplasms: histological subtypes and glial and epithelial characteristics. Virchows Arch [A] 417:97–103

  9. Miettinen M (1984) Chordoma. Antibodies to epithelial membrane antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen in differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108:891–892

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reifenberger G, Weber T, Weber RG, Wolter M, Brandis A, Kuchelmeister K, Pilz P, Reusche E, Lichter P, Wiestler OD (1999) Chordoid glioma of the third ventricle: immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characterization of a novel tumor entity. Brain Pathol 9:617–626

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takeuchi H, Kubota T, Sato K, Llena JF, Hirano A (2002) Epithelial differentiation and proliferative potential in spinal ependymomas. J Neurooncol 58:13–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uematsu Y, Rojas-Corona RR, Llena JF, Hirano A (1989) Distribution of epithelial membrane antigen in normal and neoplastic human ependyma. Acta Neuropathol 78:325–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vege KD, Giannini C, Scheithauer BW (2000) The immunophenotype of ependymomas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 8:25–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Andrea Esser, Beate Hillmann, Maria Leisse, Lisa Raestrup, Claudia Theile and Andrea Wagner for their expert technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hasselblatt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasselblatt, M., Paulus, W. Sensitivity and specificity of epithelial membrane antigen staining patterns in ependymomas. Acta Neuropathol 106, 385–388 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-003-0752-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-003-0752-8

Keywords

Navigation