Skip to main content
Log in

Catheter-ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: influence of the endocardial substrate size on clinical outcome

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ablation of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with coronary artery disease is frequently performed using the three dimensional mapping system CARTO. In the amplitude map, bipolar potentials of <1.5 mV are considered abnormal and represent damaged myocardium due to previous infarction. This pathological electrical area can be arrhythmogenic, serving as the substrate for reentrant VT. The purpose of this study was to correlate the size of the endocardial substrate with the success of VT catheter ablation. Included in this retrospective analysis were 69 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent ablation for symptomatic clinical VT using CARTO. The voltage maps were analyzed and the area with abnormal bipolar electrograms (<1.5 mV) was determined using geometric approximation models. The area of abnormal electrograms was divided into three sizes: small (≤15 cm2; 11 patients), medium (16–99 cm2; 50 patients), and large (≥100 cm2; 8 patients). Patient characteristics were not different between the three substrate groups in regard to age, tachycardia cycle length, or number of radiofrequency applications, however differed significantly between the small, medium and large group in regard to left ventricular ejection fraction (44 ± 12% vs. 32 ± 9% vs. 21 ± 7%, respectively; P = 0.001). Overall, there was a significant correlation between myocardial infarction locations and endocardial substrate sizes (P = 0.031), such that 73% of small substrates were found after inferior myocardial infarctions, and 100% of large substrates after anterior and multiple myocardial infarctions (P = 0.003). After ablation, inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias was more rare in patients with small substrates compared to patients with medium or large substrates (small substrates: 9%, medium and large substrates: 43%, P = 0.043). Although during follow-up of 25 ± 17 months (1 day to 72 months) there was no significant difference between endocardial substrate sizes in regard to recurrence rates (small: 27%, medium: 38%, large: 50%, P = 0.588), patients with a small substrate did not have fast VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF), in contrast to 30% and 38% of patients with medium and large substrates, respectively. We conclude that in patients with coronary artery disease a small area of low amplitude bipolar potentials (≤15 cm2) was seen more often after inferior myocardial infarction than after anterior and multiple infarctions. After ablation, patients with small substrates were rarely inducible and showed a more benign course during follow-up (trend towards fewer arrhythmia recurrences and no fast VT or VF). As a result smaller arrhythmogenic substrates appear to be better amenable to catheter ablation than larger substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BP:

Bipolar potentials

CL:

Cycle length

clin:

Clinical

EF:

Ejection fraction

ICD:

Internal cardioverter and defibrillator

LV:

Left ventricle or left ventricular

MI:

Myocardial infarction

RFC:

Radiofrequency current

sus:

Sustained

VA:

Ventricular arrhythmia

VF:

Ventricular fibrillation

VT:

Ventricular tachycardia

References

  1. Callans DJ, Ren JF, Michele J, Marchlinski FE, Dillon SM (1999) Electroanatomic left ventricular mapping in the porcine model of healed anterior myocardial infarction: correlation with intracardiac echocardiography and pathological analysis. Circulation 100:1744–1750

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chillou C, Lacroix D, Klug D, Magnin-Poull I, Marquie C, Messier M, Andronache M, Kouakam C, Sadoul N, Chen J, Aliot E, Kacet S (2002) Isthmus characteristics of reentrant ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation 105:726–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hadjis TA, Stevenson WG, Harada T, Friedman PL, Sager P, Saxon LA (1997) Preferential locations for reentry circuit sites causing ventricular tachycardia after inferior wall myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 8:363–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuck KH, Schlüter M, Geiger G, Siebels J (1991) Successful catheter ablation of human ventricular tachycardia with radiofrequency current guided by an endocardial map of the area of slow conduction. PACE 14:1060–1071

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, Zado E (2000) Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 101:1288–1296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy VY, Wrobleski D, Houghtaling C, Josephson ME, Ruskin JN (2003) Combined epicardial and endocardial electroanatomic mapping in a porcine model of a healed myocardial infarction. Circulation 107:3236–3242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shpun S, Gepstein L, Hayam G, Ben-Haim SA (1997) Guidance of radiofrequency endocardial ablation with real-time three-dimensional magnetic navigation system. Circulation 96:2016–2021

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soejima K, Delacretaz E, Suzuki M, Brunckhorst CB, Maisel WH, Friedmann PL, Stevenson WG (2001) Saline-cooled versus standard radiofrequency catheter ablation for infarct-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 103:1858–1862

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soejima K, Suzuki M, Maisel WH, Brunckhorst CB, Delacretaz E, Blier L, Tung S, Khan H, Stevenson WG (2001) Catheter ablation in patients with multiple and unstable ventricular tachycardias after myocardial infarction. Circulation 104:664–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sra J, Bhatia A, Dhala A, Blanck Z, Deshpande S, Cooley R, Akhtar M (2001) Electroanatomical guided catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias causing multiple defibrillator shocks. PACE 24:1645–1652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P, Saxon LA, Middlekauff HR, Natterson PD, Wiener I (1993) Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation 88:1647–1670

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevenson WG, Sager PT, Natterson PD, Saxon LA, Middlekauff HR, Wiener I (1995) Relation of pace mapping QRS configuration and conduction delay to ventricular tachycardia reentry circuits in human infarct scars. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:481–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Kocovic D, Harada T, Wiener I, Khan H (1997) Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1180–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watanable I, Masaki R, Min N, Oshikawa N, Sugimura H, Kojima T, Saito S, Ozawa Y, Kanmatsuse K (2002) Cooled-tip ablation results in increased radiofrequency power delivery and size in canine heart: importance of catheter-tip temperature monitoring for prevention of popping and impedance rise. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 6:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilber DJ, Kopp DE, Glascock DN, Kinder CA, Kall JG (1995) Catheter ablation of the mitral isthmus for ventricular tachycardia associated with inferior infarction. Circulation 92:3481–3489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Volkmer M, Ouyang F, Deger F, Ernst S, Goya M, Bänsch D, Berodt K, Kuck KH, Antz M (2006) Substrate mapping versus tachycardia mapping using CARTO in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia—impact on outcome of catheter ablation; Europace 8:968–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Antz MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antz, M., Berodt, K., Bänsch, D. et al. Catheter-ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: influence of the endocardial substrate size on clinical outcome. Clin Res Cardiol 97, 110–117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-007-0596-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-007-0596-7

Key words

Navigation