Skip to main content
Log in

Substrate mapping for scar-related ventricular tachycardia in patients with resynchronization therapy—the importance of the pacing mode

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Targets for substrate-based catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) include sites with fractionated and late potentials (LPs). We hypothesized that in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the pacing mode may influence the timing of abnormal electrograms (EGMs) relative to the surface QRS complex.

Methods

We assessed bipolar EGM characteristics in left ventricular low bipolar voltage areas (< 1.5 mV) from 10 patients with coronary disease and a CRT device undergoing catheter ablation for VT. EGMs at 81 sites were analyzed during three different pacing modes (biventricular (BiV), right ventricular (RV)-only, and left ventricular (LV)-only) pacing.

Results

Stimulus to end of local electrogram duration (Stim-to-eEGM) depended significantly on the stimulation site (BiV, LV, or RV, p = 0.032). Single-chamber pacing unmasked LPs, not present during BiV pacing, in three patients. In another three patients, a concomitant increase in stimulus to end of surface QRS duration caused by single-site pacing compensated for the increase in Stim-to-eEGM duration, thereby prohibiting LP unmasking.

Conclusion

The sequence of ventricular activation, as determined by the pacing site in patients with CRT devices, has a major influence on the detection of late potentials during substrate-guided ablation. Further study is warranted to define the optimal approaches, including the rhythm, for substrate mapping, but our findings suggest that BiV pacing may be most likely to obscure detection of late potentials as compared to single-site pacing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(10):1009–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa071098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevenson WG, Wilber DJ, Natale A, Jackman WM, Marchlinski FE, Talbert T, et al. Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial. Circulation. 2008;118(25):2773–82. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, Willems S, Ventura R, Delacretaz E, et al. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61755-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbucicchio C, Santamaria M, Trevisi N, Maccabelli G, Giraldi F, Fassini G, et al. Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: short- and long-term outcomes in a prospective single-center study. Circulation. 2008;117(4):462–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.686534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):111–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardner PI, Ursell PC, Fenoglio JJ Jr, Wit AL. Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. Circulation. 1985;72(3):596–611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Kocovic D, Harada T, et al. Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1180–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vergara P, Trevisi N, Ricco A, Petracca F, Baratto F, Cireddu M, et al. Late potentials abolition as an additional technique for reduction of arrhythmia recurrence in scar related ventricular tachycardia ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(6):621–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02246.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassidy DM, Vassallo JA, Buxton AE, Doherty JU, Marchlinski FE, Josephson ME. The value of catheter mapping during sinus rhythm to localize site of origin of ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1984;69(6):1103–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jais P, Maury P, Khairy P, Sacher F, Nault I, Komatsu Y, et al. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2012;125(18):2184–96. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson N, Gizurarson S, Viswanathan K, King B, Masse S, Kusha M, et al. Decrement evoked potential mapping: basis of a mechanistic strategy for ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(6):1433–42. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tung R, Josephson ME, Bradfield JS, Shivkumar K. Directional influences of ventricular activation on myocardial scar characterization: voltage mapping with multiple wavefronts during ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(8):e004155. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldinger SH, Stevenson WG, John RM. Ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: evidence, techniques, results, and future directions. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016;31(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brunckhorst CB, Delacretaz E, Soejima K, Maisel WH, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG. Identification of the ventricular tachycardia isthmus after infarction by pace mapping. Circulation. 2004;110(6):652–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000138107.11518.AF.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baldinger SH, Nagashima K, Kumar S, Barbhaiya CR, Choi EK, Epstein LM, et al. Electrogram analysis and pacing are complimentary for recognition of abnormal conduction and far-field potentials during substrate mapping of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(4):874–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Bakker JM, Wittkampf FH. The pathophysiologic basis of fractionated and complex electrograms and the impact of recording techniques on their detection and interpretation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(2):204–13. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.109.904763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Baldinger received educational grants from the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland, and the Swiss foundation for pacemakers and electrophysiology.

Dr. Epstein receives consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Spectranetics. Dr. John receives consulting fees from St. Jude Medical. Dr. Michaud and Dr. Tedrow receive consulting fees from St. Jude Medical and research funding from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. Dr. Stevenson is co-holder of a patent for needle ablation that is consigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Stevenson’s spouse receives research support from St. Jude Medical, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Samuel H. Baldinger: concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, drafting of manuscript

Saurabh Kumar: concept/design, data collection, critical revision

Akira Fujii: data collection, critical revision

Andreas Haeberlin: statistics, critical revision

Jorge Romero: critical revision

Laurence M. Epstein: critical revision

Gregory F. Michaud: critical revision

Roy John: critical revision

Usha B. Tedrow: critical revision

William G. Stevenson: concept/design, data interpretation, critical revision

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William G. Stevenson.

Ethics declarations

Data collection was performed according to protocols approved by the Human Research Committee of Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Each patient gave written informed consent for the electrophysiology procedure.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldinger, S.H., Kumar, S., Fujii, A. et al. Substrate mapping for scar-related ventricular tachycardia in patients with resynchronization therapy—the importance of the pacing mode. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 55, 55–62 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00548-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00548-5

Keywords

Navigation