Skip to main content
Log in

Anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing primary anastomosis: risk factors and the role of diverting loop ileostomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent data has suggested that primary anastomosis (PA), with or without a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI), is a safe option for the treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with anastomotic leak in patients who underwent a sigmoid colectomy with PA and to determine whether a DLI was protective against a clinically significant anastomotic leak.

Methods

Patients with acute complicated diverticulitis who underwent a laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with PA, with or without a DLI, were identified in the NSQIP PUF(2016–2017). The rates of anastomotic leak, receipt of DLI, and type of leak management were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed.

Results

There were 497 patients identified. Seventy-nine(15.9%) patients had a DLI, while 418 (84.1%) did not. Twenty-six anastomotic leaks were identified (5.2%). On multivariate analysis, current smoking (OR 4.02; 95% CI 1.44–11.26) and chronic steroid use (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.16–12.69) were significantly associated with an increased risk of leak. Of the 26 patients with anastomotic leaks, 5 (19.2%) had a DLI. There was no significant difference in the rate of leak between those with a DLI(5; 6.3%) and those without(21; 5.3%; p = 0.59). Patients who had a DLI were significantly less likely to experience an anastomotic leak requiring re-operation (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Regardless of the presence of a DLI, chronic steroid use and smoking are associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing colectomy with PA. The presence of a diverting loop ileostomy is protective against re-operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee JM, Bai P, Chang J, El Hechi M et al (2019) Hartmann's procedure vs primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for acute diverticulitis: nationwide analysis of 2,729 emergency surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 229:48

  2. Salem L, Flum DR (2004) Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1953–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridoux V (2017) Hartmann’s procedure or primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. JACS (J Am College Surg) 225(6):798–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambrichts DPV, Vennix S, Musters GD et al (2019) Hartmann’s procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(8):599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gachabayov M, Oberkofler CE, Tuech JJ, Hahnloser D, Bergamaschi R (2018) Resection with primary anastomosis vs nonrestorative resection for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 20(9):753–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cirocchi R, Afshar S, Shaban F et al (2018) Perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: Hartmann’s procedure or resection with primary anastomosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Tech Coloproctol 22(10):743–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1819-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall J, Hardiman K, Lee S et al (2020) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 63:728–747. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikolian VC, Kamdar NS, Regenbogen SE et al (2017) Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: a population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation. Surgery 161(6):1619–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Kiran RP (2016) Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Surg Endosc 30(12):5275–5282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR et al (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 58(3):333–338. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M et al (1999) Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 189:554–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00207-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck THK et al (2004) Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leester B, Asztalos I, Polnyib C (2002) Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection—is diverting stoma still justified? Acta Chir Iugosl 49(2):67–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaban F, Carney K, McGarry K, Holtham S (2018) Perforated diverticulitis: to anastomose or not to anastomose? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 58:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF et al (2018) Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum 61(11):1258–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A (2015) Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ondrula DP, Nelson RL, Prasad ML et al (1992) Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections. Dis Colon Rectum 35:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McKenna NP, Bews KA, Cima RR et al (2020) Development of a risk score to predict anastomotic leak after left-sided colectomy: which patients warrant diversion? J Gastrointest Surg 24:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyce SA, Harris C, Stevenson A, Lumley J, Clark D (2017) Management of low colorectal anastomotic leakage in the laparoscopic era: more than a decade of experience. Dis Colon Rectum 60(8):807–814. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cauley CE, Ruchin BS, Bordeianou L (2018) Use of primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy in patients with acute diverticulitis requiring urgent operative intervention. Dis Col Rectum 61(5):586–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baucom RB, Poulose BK, Herline AJ et al (2015) Smoking as a dominant risk factor for anastomotic leak after left colon resection. Am J Surgery 210(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards CH, Campbell V, Ho C et al (2012) Smoking is a major risk factor for anastomotic leak in patients undergoing low anterior resection. Colorect Dis 14(5):628–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26(4):499–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Phan K, Oh L, Ctercteko G et al (2019) Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 10(2):179–187. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2018.11.07

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hawkins AT, Dharmarajan S, Wells KK et al (2016) Does diverting loop ileostomy improve outcomes following open ileo-colic anastomoses? A Nationwide Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1738–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca L. Hoffman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffman, R.L., Consuegra, H., Long, K. et al. Anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing primary anastomosis: risk factors and the role of diverting loop ileostomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 36, 1543–1550 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03957-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03957-z

Keywords

Navigation