Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Usefulness of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of sphincter and pubovisceral muscle defects using a new scoring system in women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter defects in women with previous vaginal delivery and fecal incontinence and to correlate the findings with the severity of symptoms using the combined anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasonography with a new ultrasound scoring system.

Methods

Consecutive female patients with previous vaginal delivery and fecal incontinence symptoms were screened. Fecal incontinence was assessed with the Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence scale, and the extent of defects was assessed by an ultrasound score based on results of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound. Fecal incontinence was assessed with the Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence scale.

Results

Of 84 women with previous vaginal delivery and fecal incontinence, 21 (25%) had intact pubovisceral muscles and anal sphincters; 63 (75%) had a pubovisceral muscle or anal sphincter defect, or both. Twenty-eight (33%) had a pubovisceral muscle defect [23% with an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect or combined EAS/internal anal sphincter defects; 11% with intact anal sphincters]. Thirty-five (42%) had intact pubovisceral muscles and an anal sphincter defect. Compared with women with intact pubovisceral muscles/anal sphincter defects, patients with pubovisceral muscle defects had significantly higher incontinence scores and significantly higher ultrasound scores indicating more extensive defects. Incontinence symptoms correlated positively with the ultrasound score, measurements of sphincter defects, and area of the levator hiatus.

Conclusions

Evaluation of both pubovisceral muscles and anal sphincters is important to identify defects and determine treatment for women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery. The severity of fecal incontinence symptoms is significantly related to the extent of defects of the pubovisceral muscles and anal sphincters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR (1993) The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 34:685–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG (1993) Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon rectum 36:1158–1160

  3. Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee SH et al (2002) Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Dis Colon rectum 45:10–15

  4. Kim JC, Cho YK, Kim SY, Park SK, Lee MG (2002) Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging. Surg Endosc 16:1280–1285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1995) Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 78:312–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karoui S, Savoye-Collet C, Koning E, Leroi AM, Denis P (1999) Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:389–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams AB, Spencer JA, Bartram CI (2002) Assessment of third degree tears using three-dimensional anal endosonography with combined anal manometry: a novel technique. BJOG 109:833–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM, Lima DM et al (2007) Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Surg Endosc 21:2207–2211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A et al (2009) High-resolution three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1213–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wasserberg N, Mazaheri A, Petrone P, Tulchinsky H, Kaufman HS (2011) Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography of external anal sphincter defects in patients with faecal incontinence: correlation with symptoms and manometry. Color Dis 13:449–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murad-Regadas SM, Bezerra LR, Silveira CR et al (2013) Anatomical and functional characteristics of the pelvic floor in nulliparous women submitted to three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography: case control study and evaluation of interobserver agreement. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 35:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeLancey JL (2001) Anatomy. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D (eds) Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 112–124

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lammers K, Futterer JJ, Prokop M, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB (2012) Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect. Int Urogynecol J 23:1653–1664

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM (1984) Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 2:546–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S (2003) The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101:46–53

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V (2005) Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 106:707–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG 113:225–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdool Z, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2009) The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimension and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(89):e81–e85

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lammers K, Futterer JJ, Inthout J et al (2013) Correlating signs and symptoms with pubovisceral muscle avulsions on magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(148):e141–e147

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murad-Regadas SM, Fernandes GO, Regadas FS et al (2014) Assessment of pubovisceral muscle defects and levator hiatal dimensions in women with faecal incontinence after vaginal delivery: is there a correlation with severity of symptoms? Color Dis 16:1010–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2011) Sonographic detection of puborectalis muscle avulsion is not associated with anal incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 51:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon rectum 36:77–97

  24. Menees SB, Smith TM, Xu X et al (2013) Factors associated with symptom severity in women presenting with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon rectum 56:97–102

  25. Oberwalder M, Dinnewitzer A, Baig MK et al (2004) The association between late-onset fecal incontinence and obstetric anal sphincter defects. Arch Surg 139:429–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME et al (2010) Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(488):e481–e486

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bordeianou L, Lee KY, Rockwood T et al (2008) Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and with presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1010–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shek KL, Dietz HP (2009) The effect of childbirth on hiatal dimensions. Obstet Gynecol 113:1272–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paquette IM, Varma MG, Kaiser AM, Steele SR, Rafferty JF (2015) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 58:623–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mellgren A, Zutshi M, Lucente VR et al (2016) A posterior anal sling for fecal incontinence: results of a 152-patient prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(349):e341–e348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

    Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, Graziela Olivia da S. Fernandes, Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas, Lusmar Veras Rodrigues & Iris Daiana Dealcanfreitas

  2. Department of Surgery, Unit of Pelvic Floor and Anorectal Physiology, School of Medicine, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Ceará, Av Pontes Vieira, 2551, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60130-241, Brazil

    Sthela M. Murad-Regadas

  3. Unit of Pelvic Floor and Anorectal Physiology, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sao Carlos Hospital, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

    Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas, Lusmar Veras Rodrigues, Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas Filho, Adjra da Silva Vilarinho & Mariana Murad da Cruz

Authors
  1. Sthela M. Murad-Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Graziela Olivia da S. Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lusmar Veras Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Iris Daiana Dealcanfreitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adjra da Silva Vilarinho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mariana Murad da Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sthela M. Murad-Regadas.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclosure

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murad-Regadas, S.M., da S. Fernandes, G.O., Regadas, F.S.P. et al. Usefulness of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of sphincter and pubovisceral muscle defects using a new scoring system in women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 499–507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2750-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2750-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation