Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Demonstrate precisely the anatomic configuration of the anal canal and the length and thickness of the anal sphincters using three-dimensional (3-D) anorectal ultra-sonography in both genders.

Methods

Twelve normal volunteer males and 14 females, with a mean age of 52.4 and 50.3 years, respectively, were prospectively enrolled in this study. All individuals from both groups were submitted to anorectal ultra-sonography. The anal canal was analyzed, measuring the length and thickness of the external anal sphincter (EAE), internal anal sphincter (IAS), puborectalis muscle (PR) and the gap (distance from the anterior EAS to the anorectal junction) in the midline longitudinal (ML) and transverse (MT) planes, and the results were compared between quadrants and genders.

Results

The distribution of sphincter muscles is asymmetric in both genders. The anterior upper anal canal is an extension of the rectal wall with all layers clearly identified. The anterior IAS is formed in the distal upper anal canal and is significantly shorter in female than in male in all quadrants. The anterior IAS length is shorter than the posterior and lateral in both genders. The anterior EAS length is significantly shorter (2.2 cm) and the gap is longer (1.2 cm) in female than in male (3.4 cm) (0.7 cm) (p < 0.05), respectively. The posterior and lateral EAS-PR is significant longer in males (3.6 cm) (3.9 cm) than in females (3.2 cm) (3.5 cm) (p < 0.05), respectively. The lateral EAS-PR is significant longer than the posterior part in both genders. The anterior IAS is significantly thicker in males (0.19 cm) than in females (0.12 cm) (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

3-D anal endosonography enabled measurement of the different anatomical structures of the anal canal and demonstrated its asymmetrical configuration. The shorter anterior EAS and IAS associated with a longer gap could justify the higher incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction in females, especially fecal incontinence and anorectocele with rectal intussusception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deen Ki, Kumar D, Williams JG, Ollif J, Keighley MR (1993) The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 34:685–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheong DMO, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG (1993) Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 1158–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deen KI, Madoff RD, Belmonte C, Wong D (1995) Preoperative Staging of Rectal Neoplasms With Endorectal Ultrasonography. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 6(2): 78–85

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JC, Cho YK, Kim SY, Park SK, Lee MG (2002) Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging. Surg Endosc 16(9): 1280–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oberwalder M, Thaler K, Baig MK, Dinnewitzer A, Efron J, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2004) Anal ultrasound and endosonographic measurement of perineal body thickness: a new evaluation for fecal incontinence in females. Surg Endosc 18(4): 650–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Humphries KN, Kamm MA, Kmiot WA (1999) Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Br J Surg 86: 365–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Marshall MM, Nicholls RJ, Kmiot WA (2001) Multiplanar anal endosonography – normal anal canal anatomy. Colorectal Dis 3: 169–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bollard RC, Gardiner A, Lindow S, Phillips K, Duthie GS (2002) Normal female anal sphincter: difficulties in interpretation explained. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 171–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. West RL, Felt-Bersma JF, Hansen BE, Schouten R, Kuipers E (2005) Volume measurements of the anal sphincter complex in healthy controls and fecal-incontinent patients with a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images. Dis Colon Rectum 48(3): 540–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Regadas SMM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Lima DMR, Regadas-Filho FSP (2005) Importância do Ultra-som Tridimensional na Avaliação Anorretal. Arq Gastroenterol 42: 226–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Regadas FSP, Murad-Regadas SM, Wexner SD, Rodrigues LV, Souza MHLP, Silva FR, Lima DMR, Regadas Filho FSP (2006) Anorectal three-dimensional endosonography and anal manometry in assessing anterior rectocele in women: a new pathogenesis concept and the basic surgical principle. Colorectal Dis 9: 80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, et al. (2006) Ecodefecografia tridimensional. Nova técnica para avaliação da Evacuação Obstruída. Rev bras coloproct 26(2): 136–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Soares FA, Escalante RD (2007) A novel 3D Dynamic Anorectal Ultrasonography Technique (Echodefecography) to Assess Obstructed Defecation Syndrome comparing with Defecography. Colorectal Dis (In press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Medical School of the Federal University of Ceara and Hospital Sao Carlos, Av Edilson Brasil Soares, 1892. Edson Queiroz, 60834-220, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

    F. Sergio P. Regadas, Sthela M. Murad-Regadas, Doryane M. R. Lima, Flavio R. Silva, Rosilma G. L. Barreto, Marcellus H. L. P. Souza & F. Sergio P. Regadas Filho

Authors
  1. F. Sergio P. Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sthela M. Murad-Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doryane M. R. Lima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Flavio R. Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rosilma G. L. Barreto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marcellus H. L. P. Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. F. Sergio P. Regadas Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Sergio P. Regadas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Regadas, F.S.P., Murad-Regadas, S.M., Lima, D.M.R. et al. Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Surg Endosc 21, 2207–2211 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9339-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9339-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation