Abstract
Purpose
Low anterior resection is commonly performed for carcinoma of the distal rectum. Diverting ileostomy has been used to decrease the septic consequence of anastomotic leakage and to reduce the re-operation rate. Nevertheless, subsequent closure of ileostomy can be associated with considerable morbidities. This study aimed to evaluate the morbidities after closure of ileostomy and to identify possible risk factors associated with the morbidities.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent closure of ileostomy, after a previous low anterior resection and defunctioning ileostomy for rectal cancer, was reviewed retrospectively. Patient’s demographics, coexisting morbidities, operative details, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed.
Results
From January 2000 to September 2012, 213 patients who underwent ileostomy closure were included. Thirty-five patients developed post-operative complications. The overall complication rate was 16.4 %. The majority of complications could be managed by conservative treatment. Only one patient required re-operation due to intestinal obstruction. There was no 30-day mortality. Age >80 years was an independent risk factor for post-operative complications. Age >80 years was also an independent risk factor for developing urinary retention (p = 0.001) and prolonged ileus (p = 0.02). Closure of ileostomy with hand-sewn techniques showed a higher incidence of post-operative intestinal obstruction (p = 0.049) compared to closure using stapler.
Conclusion
Closure of ileostomy following low anterior resection is associated with acceptable morbidities. Elderly patients tend to have a more complicated post-operative course and require more medical attention. The use of stapler is the preferred method for ileostomy closure as it is associated with less post-operative intestinal obstruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
http://www.chp.gov.hk. Centre for Health Protection. Department of Health.
Lee WS, Yun SH, Roh YN, Yun HR, Lee WY, Cho YB, Chun HK (2008) Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1124–1129
Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC, Blϋcher J, Gjertsen Ø, Dullerud R (2005) Anastomotic leak following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: true incidence and diagnostic challenges. Color Dis 7:578–581
Caulfied H, Human NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surgery 148:177–182
Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2076–2079
Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS, Kelly OT, Kelly SB (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 32:2101–2106
Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D (2007) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Color Dis 10:460–464
Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M, Thiede A, Meyer D (2006) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1011–1017
Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M, Yamaguchi T (2010) Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 34:1937–1942
Saha AK, Tapping CR, Foley GT, Baker RP, Sagar PM, Burke DA, Sue-Ling HM, Finan PJ (2009) Morbidity and mortality after closure of loop ileostomy. Color Dis 11:866–871
Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723
Sharma A, Deeb AP, Rickles AS, Iannuzzi JC, Monson JRT, Flemming FJ (2012) Closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with considerable morbidity. Color Dis 15:458–462
Perez RO, Habr-Fama A, Seid VE, Proscurshim I, Sousa AH Jr, Kiss DR, Linhares M, Sapucahy M, Gam-Rodregues J (2006) Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1539–1545
Shadle B, Barbaro C, Waxman K, Connor S, Von Dollen K (2009) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention. Am Surg 75:922–924
Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM (2014) Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 207:288–292
Mohammadi-Fallah M, Hamedanchi S, Tayyebi-Azar A (2012) Preventive effect of tamsulosin on postoperative urinary retention. K J Urol 53:419–423
Omundsen M, Hayes J, Collinson R, Merrie A, Parry B, Bissett I (2012) Early ileostomy closure: is there a downside? ANZ J Surg 82:352–354
Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM, Rabau M (2005) Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary versus delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 9:206–208
Camacho-Mauries D, Rodriguez-Díaz JL, Salgado-Nesme N, González QH, Vergara-Fernández O (2013) Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure versus conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection. Dis Colon Rectum 56:205–211
Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT (1999) Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 177:463–466
Shelygin YA, Chernyshov SV, Rybakov EG (2010) Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative mortality. Tech Coloproctol 14:19–23
Löffler T., Rossion I., Gooßen K., Saure D., Weitz J., Ulrich A., Büchler M.W., Diener M.K. (2014). Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg, Dec 25. [Epub ahead of print]
Peacock O, Law CI, Collins PW, Speake WJ, Lund JN, Tierney GM (2011) Closure of loop ileostomy: potentially a daycase procedure? Tech Coloproctology 15:431–437
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Man, V.C.M., Choi, H.K., Law, W.L. et al. Morbidities after closure of ileostomy: analysis of risk factors. Int J Colorectal Dis 31, 51–57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2327-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2327-2