Skip to main content
Log in

Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Loop ileostomy is widely employed as a defunctioning procedure for left-sided colonic anastomoses. Closure of the stoma carries a risk of morbidity and even mortality. The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate the ability of stapled stoma closure to decrease the rates of perioperative morbidity.

Methods

One hundred and nineteen patients (mean age 56.2 ± 5.4 years) underwent two-stage operations for rectal carcinoma with protective loop ileostomy between 2005 and 2008. All patients were randomly divided into two groups: 56 patients had conventional ileostomy takedown, while in the other 63, a functional end-to-end anastomosis was created using a linear stapler. Groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and other parameters.

Results

Mean time of stoma closure using functional end-to-end anastomosis was 68 ± 7, when compared to 92 ± 11 min (P = 0.01) for conventional stoma closure. The overall morbidity rate after ileostomy closure using a stapler was 3.2%: one patient (1.6%) developed a wound infection and self-limited bleeding from the anastomotic line, while another patient (1.6%) had an ileal obstruction caused by adhesions and required additional intervention. Conventional ileostomy closure resulted in a 14.3% morbidity rate: six patients (10.7%) had prolonged ileus, 2 (3.6%) had small bowel obstruction, and 2 (3.6%) had wound infections (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

Functional end-to-end anastomosis reduces operating time and morbidity compared to conventional ileostomy takedown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D et al (2008) Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 12:437–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Riesener KP, Lehnen W, Höfer M, Kasperk R, Braun JC, Schumpelick V (1997) Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment. World J Surg 21:103–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kestenberg A, Becker JM (1985) Anew technique of loop ileostomy closure after endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Surgery 98:109–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasegawa H, Radley S, Morton DG, Keighley MR (2000) Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 231:202–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amin SN, Memon MA, Armitage NC, Scholefield JH (2001) Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83:246–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bain IM, Patel R, Keighley MR (1996) Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:555–556

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hull TL, Kobe I, Fazio VW (1996) Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1086–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung TT, MacLean AR, Buie WD, Dixon E (2008) Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Toole GC, Hyland JM, Grant DC, Barry MK (1999) Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit. J Am Coll Surg 188:6–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann LJ, Stewart PJ, Goodwin RJ, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (1991) Complications following closure of loop ileostomy. Aust N Z J Surg 61:493–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kraemer M, Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Eu KW (2000) A comparison of sutured and stapled closure of diverting loop ileostomies. Tech Coloproctol 4:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. García-Botello SA, García-Armengol J, García-Granero E et al (2004) A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 21:440–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6, 107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. G. Rybakov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shelygin, Y.A., Chernyshov, S.V. & Rybakov, E.G. Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity. Tech Coloproctol 14, 19–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0550-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0550-y

Keywords

Navigation