Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Endoscopic polypectomy still remains the cornerstone of therapy for colorectal polyps and adenomas. However, if colorectal polyps are too large or not accessible for endoscopic ablation or cannot be removed without an increased risk for perforation, operative procedures are required. In such circumstances, laparoscopic resection represents a minimally invasive alternative.

Materials and methods

Between January 1993 and December 2004, more than 2,500 endoscopic polypectomies were performed at the Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany. In patients which could not be treated by endoscopic polypectomy due to size, location, and/or risk of complications, a laparoscopic colorectal resection was performed. All data were prospectively assessed in our “colorectal resection” database.

Results

The database analysis revealed 58 patients with endoscopically not resectable colorectal polyps who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection (intend to treat). In 54 patients, the operative procedure could be finished by the laparoscopic approach (study population). The conversion rate was 6.9% (four of 58). An ileocolic resection was performed in 20 patients (37.0%), and 14 patients (25.9%) underwent an anterior rectal resection. A right colectomy was necessary in 12 patients (22.2%), and six patients (11.1%) underwent a sigmoid resection. In the remaining two patients, a left colectomy and a resection of the transverse colon were performed. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in five patients (9.3%). Perioperative mortality was not registered. The histopathological work-up revealed benign disease in all cases.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps is a safe and minimally invasive technique for the management of benign colorectal tumors. Thus, the laparoscopic approach to endoscopically not resectable polyps enriches the therapeutic spectrum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruch HP, Esnaashari H, Schwandner O (2005) Current status of laparoscopic therapy of colorectal cancer. Dig Dis 23:127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruch HP, Schwandner O (2001) Current status of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer. Onkologie 24:29–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cocilovo C, Smith LE, Stahl T, Douglas J (2003) Transanal endoscopic excision of rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 17:1461–1463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, Blanchi S, Dumas R, Filiberti R (2004) EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 60:234–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coverlizza S, Risio M, Ferrari A, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Rossini FP (1989) Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential. Cancer 64:1937–1947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eijsbouts QA, Heuff G, Sietses C, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (1999) Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colonic polyps. Br J Surg 86:505–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662-654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Franklin EJ, Seetharam S, Lowney J, Horgan PG (2003) Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1380–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franklin ME Jr, Diaz EJ, Abrego D, Parra-Davila E, Glass JL (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1246–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia A, Nunez O, Gonzalez-Asanza C, Parera A, Menchen L, Ripoll C, Senent C, Cos E, Menchen P (2004) Safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulator ablation therapy for flat colorectal adenomas. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 96:315–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Germer CT, Ritz JP, Buhr HJ (2003) Laparoscopic colon surgery. Indications and technique. Chirurg 74:966–980 quiz 981-962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giacosa A, Frascio F, Munizzi F (2004) Epidemiology of colorectal polyps. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 2):s243–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joo JS, Amarnath L, Wexner SD (1998) Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial? Surg Endosc 12:1341–1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Millward BL, Fazio VW (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Grande L, Fuster J, Tabet J, Ramos C, Pique JM, Cifuentes A, Visa J (1997) Postoperative complications of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 11:119–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang JT, Shieh MJ, Chen CN, Cheng YM, Chang KJ, Wang SM (2002) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection for management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon. World J Surg 26:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo SH, Law WL (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps not suitable for colonoscopic removal. Surg Endosc 19:1252–1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicholls RJ, Zinicola R, Binda GA (2004) Indications for colorectal resection for adenoma before and after polypectomy. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 2):s291–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Groitl H, Wittekind C, Hahn EG (1997) Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:267–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pokala N, Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Brady K, Senagore AJ (2007) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for polyps not suitable for endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc 21:400–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Prohm P, Weber J, Bonner C (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted coloscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:746–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Repici A, Tricerri R (2004) Endoscopic polypectomy: techniques, complications and follow-up. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 2):s283–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, Sandler RS, Ahnen D, Haile RW, Burke CA, Snover DC, Bresalier RS, McKeown-Eyssen G, Mandel JS, Bond JH, Van Stolk RU, Summers RW, Rothstein R, Church TR, Cole BF, Byers T, Mott L, Baron JA (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129:34–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Smedh K, Skullman S, Kald A, Anderberg B, Nystrom P (1997) Laparoscopic bowel mobilization combined with intraoperative colonoscopic polypectomy in patients with an inaccessible polyp of the colon. Surg Endosc 11:643–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, Nakamura Y, White R, Smits AM, Bos JL (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319:525–532

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wetherall AP, Williams NM, Kelly MJ (1993) Endoscopic transanal resection in the management of patients with sessile rectal adenomas, anastomotic stricture and rectal cancer. Br J Surg 80:788–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Young-Fadok TM, Radice E, Nelson H, Harmsen WS (2000) Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched series. Mayo Clin Proc 75:344–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Mrs. C. Killaitis is gratefully acknowledged for her help in keeping the “colorectal resection database” updated.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Mirow.

Additional information

The authors Hauenschild and Bader contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hauenschild, L., Bader, F.G., Laubert, T. et al. Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24, 755–759 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0688-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0688-0

Keywords

Navigation