Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Fast-track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients—is it feasible?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The aim of the “fast-track” rehabilitation after elective colonic surgery is to lower the extent of general complications. Elderly patients may especially profit from this multi-modal peri-operative treatment including enforced early mobilisation and oral nutrition.

Materials and methods

In this prospective study using a well-defined post-operative multi-modal treatment programme, we examined the feasibility of this so-called fast-track rehabilitation in elderly patients. The programme employed combined thoracic peri-dural analgesia, early enforced mobilisation and rapid oral nutrition.

Results

Seventy-four consecutive patients older than 70 years with benign or malignant disease of the large intestine were operated on. All patients were treated peri-operatively using the “fast-track” rehabilitation programme. Of the patients, 84% were able to have liquids orally on the day of surgery and 86% had solid food on the 1st post-operative day. The median time until the first bowel movement was 2 days. Only 12 (16%) patients had a total of 16 local complications, including 2 (3%) patients with anastomotic leakages. Nine patients (12%) had a total of 14 general complications; mortality rate was 1% (n = 1). Patients were discharged from the hospital 5 (5th–95th percentile = 4–6 days) days after surgery.

Conclusion

Using the “fast-track” rehabilitation programme on elderly patient is not only feasible but may also lower the number of general complications and the duration of the hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwenk W, Boehm B, Stock W (1992) Perioperative Behandlung bei elektiven kolorektalen Resektionen in Deutschland. Zentralbl Chir 117:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwenk W, Guenther N, Haase O, Konschake U et al (2004) Wandel der perioperativen Therapie bei elektiven kolorektalen Resektionen in Deutschland 1991 und 2001/2002. Zentralbl Chir 128(12):1086–1092

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15(2):116–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) “Colon-/rectal carcinoma” prospective studies as comprehensive surgical quality assurance. Chirurg 73(2):138–145 (discussion 145–146)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2001) Effect of caseload on the short-term outcome of colon surgery: results of a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis 16(6):362–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Milsom JW, Boehm B (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H et al (2002) Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):130–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Staib L, Link KH, Blatz A, Berger HG (2002) Surgery of colorectal cancer: surgical morbidity and five- and ten-year results in 2400 patients—monoinstitutinal experience. World J Surg 26:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart RW, Williamson RP, Billingham R (2006) Care after colonic operation—is it evidence based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 202:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87(11):1540–1545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232(1):51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD et al (1992) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340(8823):831–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kehlet H (1998) Modification of responses to surgery by neural blockade: clinical implications. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (eds) Neural blockade in clinical anaesthesia and management of pain. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 129–175

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wexner SD (1998) Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced lengths of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 186(5):589–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM et al (1995) Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 222(1):73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolters U, Isenberg J, Stutzer H (1997) Colorectal carcinoma—aspects of surgery in the elderly. Anticancer Res 17:1273–1276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Menke H, Graf JM, Heinz A et al (1993) Risk factors of perioperative morbidity and mortality in colorectal cancer with special references to tumor stage, site and age. Zentralbl Chir 118(1):40–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley LW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86(7):938–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arenal JJ, Benito C, Ortega C et al (1999) Colorectal resection and primary anastomosis in patients aged 70 and older: prospective study. Eur J Surg 165:593–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2005) The impact of the risk factor “age” on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management. World J Surg 29(8):1013–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29(11):733–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anonymous (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systemic review. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:968–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kashtan H, Werbin N, Wasserman I et al (1992) Colorectal cancer in patients over 70 years old. A prospective study of operative results. Isr J Med Sci 28(12):861–864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Paksoy M, Ipek T, Colak T, Cebeci H (1999) Influence of age on prognosis and management of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg 165:55–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbolle P, Lund C, Mogensen T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241(3):416–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Schwenk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scharfenberg, M., Raue, W., Junghans, T. et al. “Fast-track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients—is it feasible?. Int J Colorectal Dis 22, 1469–1474 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0317-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0317-8

Keywords

Navigation