Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Causes of skill in seasonal predictions of the Arctic Oscillation

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on an analysis of hindcasts from a seasonal forecast system, complemented by the analysis of a large ensemble of AMIP simulations, possible causes for skillful prediction of the winter Arctic Oscillation (AO) on a seasonal time-scale are analyzed. The possibility that the recent increase in AO skill could be due to model improvements, or due to changes in the persistence characteristics of the AO, is first discounted. The analysis then focuses on exploring the possibility that the recent increase in prediction skill in AO may be due to sampling variations or could have physical causes. Temporal variations in AO skill due entirely to sampling alone cannot be discounted as this is a fundamental constraint on verifications over a short time-series. This notion is supported from theoretical considerations, and from the analysis of the temporal variations in the perfect model skill where substantial variations in skill due to sampling alone are documented. As for the physical causes, the analysis indicates possible links in the prediction skill of AO with the SST forcing from the tropics, particularly related to the SST variations associated with the Trans-Niño Index (TNI). Interannual and low frequency variations in the TNI could have contributed to similar temporal variations in AO skill. For example, a dominance of central Pacific El Niño events after 2000 (a reflection of low-frequency variations in TNI) coincided with an increase in the prediction skill of AO. The analysis approach and results provide an avenue for further investigations; for example, model simulations forced with the SST pattern associated with the TNI, to establish or reaffirm causes for AO skill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander MA, Blade I, Newman M, Lanzante JR, Lau N-C, Scott JD (2002) The Atmospheric bridge: the influence of ENSO teleconnections on Air–Sea interaction over the Global Oceans. J Clim 15:2205–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res Oceans 112:C11007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnston AG, Chelliah M, Goldengerg SB (1997) Documentation of a highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific. Atmos Ocean 35:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton CS, Battisti DS (2000) An interpretation of the results from atmospheric general circulation models forced by the time history of the observed sea surface temperature distribution. Geophys Res Lett 27:767–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler A et al (2016) The Climate-system Historical Forecast Project: do stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate predictions in boreal winter? Q J R Meteorol Soc 142:1413–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunstone N, Smith D, Scaife A, Hermanson L, Eade R, Robinson N, Andrews M, Kight J (2016) Skilful predictions of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation one year ahead. Nat Geosci 9:809–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eade R, Smith D, Scaife E, Wallace N, Dunstone L, Hermanson, Robinson N (2014) Do seasonal-to-decadal climate predictions under-estimate the predictability of the real world? Geophys Res Lett 41:5620–5628. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein SB (2000) The timescale, power spectra, and climate noise properties of teleconnection patterns. J Clim 13:4430–4440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan C, McPhaden MJ (2016) Ocean process affecting the twenty-first-century shift in ENSO SST variability. J Clim 29:6861–6879. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0870.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerling MP, Kumar A, Zhong M (1997) El Niño, La Nia and the nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J Clim 10:1769–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Hunag B, Xue Y, Wang W, Jha B (2011) Persistent atmospheric anomalies in the North Atlantic from summer 2009-summer 2010. J Clim 24:-5812–5830

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowiak JE, Xie P (1999) CAMS-OPI: A global satellite-rain gauge merged product for real time precipitation monitoring application. J Clim 12:3335–3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang D et al (2014) Prediction of the Arctic Oscillation in boreal winter by dynamical seasonal forecast systems. Geophys Res Lett 41:3577–3585. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirtman B, Pirani A (2009) The state of the art of seasonal prediction—Outcomes and recommendations from the first World Climate Research Program workshop on seasonal prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2707.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2009) Finite sample and uncertainty estimates for skill measures for seasonal prediction. Mon Wea Rev 137:2622–2631. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2814.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Hoerling MP (2000) Analysis of a conceptual model of seasonal climate variability and implications for seasonal predictions. Bull Am Meteor Soc 81:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Wang H (2015) On the potential of extratropical SST anomalies for improving climate predictions. Clim Dyn 44:2557–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Peng P, Chen M (2014a) Is there a relationship between potential and actual shill? Mon Wea Rev 142:2220–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Jha B, Wang H (2014b) Attribution of SST variability in global Oceans and the role of ENSO. Clim Dyn 43:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushnir Y, Robinson WA, Chang P, Robertson AW (2006) The physical basis for predicting Atlantic sector seasonal-to-interannual climate variability. J Clim 19:5949–5970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau N-C (1981) A diagnostic study of recurrent meteorological anomalies appearing in a 15-year simulation with a GFDL general circulation mode. Mon Wea Rev 109:2287–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, McPhaden MJ (2010) Increasing intensity of El Niño in the central-equatorial Pacifc. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044007

    Google Scholar 

  • Limpasuvan V, Hartmann DL (1999) Eddies and the annular modes of climate variability. Geophys Res Lett 26:3133–3136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantua NJ, Hare SR, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis RC (1997) A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:1069–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta VM, Suarez MJ, Manganello JV, Delworth TL (2000) Oceanic influence on the North Atlantic Oscillation and associated northern hemisphere climate variations: 1959–1993. Geophys Res Lett 27:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL002381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2010) Assessment of intraseasonal to interannual climate prediction and predictability, pp 192. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (ISBN-10:0–309-15183-X)

  • Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108:2–1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds WR, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15:1609–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddle EE, Butler AH, Furtado JC, Cohen JL, Kumar A (2013) CFSv2 ensemble prediction of the wintertime Arctic Oscillation. Clim Dyn 41:1099–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1850-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AW (2001) Influence of ocean-atmosphere interaction on the Arctic Oscillation in two general circulation models. J Clim 14:3240–3254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AW, Mechoso CR, Kim Y-J (2000) The influence of Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies on the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Clim 13:122–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell MJ, Rowell DP, Folland CK (1999) Oceanic forcing of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation and European climate. Nature 398:320–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S et al (2014) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27:2185–2208. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife AA et al (2014) Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American winters. Geophys Res Lett 41:2514–2519. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife AA et al (2017) Tropical rainfall, Rossby waves and regional winter climate predictions. Q J R Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2910

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi W, Schaller N, MacLeod D, Palmer TN, Weisheimer A (2015) Impact of hindcast length on estimates of seasonal climate predictability. Geophys Res Lett 42:1554–1559. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale T, Molteni F, Ferranti L (2015) Atmospheric initial conditions and predictability of the Arctic Oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 42:1173–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP (2001) Indices of El Niño evolution. J Clim 14:1697–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth EK, Branstrator GW, Karoly D, Kumar A, Lau N-C, Ropelewski C (1998) Progress during TOGA in understanding and modeling global teleconnections associated with tropical sea surface temperatures. J Geophys Res 107(C7):14291–14324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Kimoto M (1999) Tropical-extratropical connection in the Atlantic atmosphere-ocean variability. Geophys Res Lett 26:2247–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisheimer A, Schaller N, O’Reilly C, MacLeod DA, Palmer TN (2017) Atmospheric seasonal forecasts of the twentieth century: multi-decadal variability in predictive skill of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and their potential value for extreme event attribution. Q J R Meteorol Soc 143:917–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen C, Kumar A, Xue Y (2014) Factors contributing to uncertainty in Pacific Decadal Oscillation index. Geophys Res Lett 41:7980–7986. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wang L, Xiang B, Qi L, He J (2015) Impacts of two types of La Niña on the NAO during boreal winter. Clim Dyn 44:1351–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Michelle L'Heureux, Peitao Peng and two anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments that led to improvements in the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Climate Prediction Center, NCEP/NWS/NOAA, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD, 20740, USA

    Arun Kumar & Mingyue Chen

Authors
  1. Arun Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingyue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Kumar.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 239 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Chen, M. Causes of skill in seasonal predictions of the Arctic Oscillation. Clim Dyn 51, 2397–2411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-4019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-4019-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation