Skip to main content
Log in

A retrospective comparison of CT and MRI in detecting pediatric cervical spine injury

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although clinical criteria have been applied in the assessment of pediatric cervical spine trauma, no consensus has been established when imaging is required. With the increasing prevalence of computed tomography (CT) use in pediatric trauma and the concern for radiation in children, we sought to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT in detecting pediatric cervical spine injuries.

Methods

We retrospectively queried a pediatric trauma database and identified pediatric patients who underwent both CT and MRI studies of the cervical spine and derived the statistical measures of each imaging modality to detect osseous and ligamentous/soft tissue injury.

Results

Eighty-four patients were identified with a mean age of 9.0 ± 5.8 years (56 % male). Sixteen patients were identified with injury, 12 with soft tissue abnormalities on MRI (nine edema and six ligamentous), and 6 with osseous abnormalities on CTs (six osseous fractures and one discogenic injury). Of the six patients who presented with CT-identified osseous injuries, MRI detected all six fractures as well as an additional compression fracture.

Conclusion

Using CT as the standard for osseous injury, MRI had a sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 97 %, negative predictive value (NPV) of 75 %, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100 %. Using MRI as the standard for soft tissue injury, CT had a sensitivity of 23 %, specificity of 100 %, NPV of 88 %, and PPV of 100 %. Further studies are required to investigate the use of MRI to detect osseous injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackland HM, Cooper DJ, Malham GM, Stuckey SL (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging for clearing the cervical spine in unconscious intensive care trauma patients. J Trauma 60(3):668–673. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000196825.50790.e8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aufdermaur M (1974) Spinal injuries in juveniles: necropsy findings in twelve cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56:513–519

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baysson H, Etard C, Brisse HJ, Bernier MO (2012) Diagnostic radiation exposure in children and cancer risk: current knowledge and perspectives. Arch Pediatr 19(1):64–73. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2011.10.023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birney TJ, Hanley EN (1989) Traumatic cervical spine injuries in childhood and adolescence. Spine 14(12):1277–1282. doi:10.1097/00007632-198912000-00001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ (2000) Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spine: an evidence-based approach. Skeletal Radiol 29:632–639. doi:10.1007/s002560000270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA (1999) Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 212(1):117–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blauth M, Schmidt U, Otte D, Krettek C (1996) Fractures of the odontoid process in small children: biomechanical analysis and report of three cases. Eur Spine J 5(1):63–70. doi:10.1007/BF00307830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284. doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshuaer DM (2007) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol 14:227–232. doi:10.1007/s10140-007-0618-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown RL, Brunn MA, Garcia VF (2001) Cervical spine injuries in children: a review of 103 patients treated consecutively at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. J Pediatr Surg 36:1107–1114. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2001.25665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickman CA, Rekate HL, Sonntag VK, Zabramski JM (1989) Pediatric spinal trauma: vertebral column and spinal cord injuries in children. Pediatr Neurosci 15:237–256. doi:10.1159/000120476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Egloff AM, Kadom N, Vezina G, Bulas D (2009) Pediatric cervical spine trauma imaging: a practical approach. Pediatr Radiol 39(5):447–456. doi:10.1007/s00247-008-1043-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffen MM, Frykberg ER, Kerwin AJ, Schinco MA, Tepas JJ, Rowe K et al (2003) Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan? J Trauma 55:222–227. doi:10.1097/01.TA.0000083332.93868.E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hachen HJ (1977) Spinal cord injury in children and adolescents diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic consideration in the acute stage [proceedings]. Paraplegia 15:55–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hadley MN, Zabramski JM, Browner CM, Rekate H, Sonntag VK (1988) Pediatric spinal trauma. Review of 122 cases of spinal cord and vertebral column injuries. J Neurosurg 68:18–24. doi:10.3171/jns.1988.68.1.0018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hegenbarth R, Ebel KD (1976) Roentgen findings in fractures of the vertebral column in childhood. Examination of 35 patients and its results. Pediatr Radiol 5:34–39. doi:10.1007/BF00988660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez JA, Chupik C, Swischuk LE (2004) Cervical spine trauma in children under 5 years: productivity of CT. Emerg Radiol 10(4):176–178. doi:10.1007/s10140-003-0320-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI, National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 343(2):94–99. doi:10.1056/NEJM200007133430203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmes JF, Mirvis SE, Panacek EA, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Velmahos GC et al (2002) Variability in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 53(3):524–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorenzo RL, Karrellas A, Shiran S, Deguzman MA, Jimenez RR (2008) CT versus plain radiographs for evaluation of c-spine injury in young children: do benefits outweigh risks? Pediatr Radiol 38(6):635–644. doi:10.1007/s00247-007-0728-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kewalramani LS, Kraus JF, Sterling HM (1980) Acute spinal-cord lesions in a pediatric population: epidemiological and clinical features. Paraplegia 18:206–219. doi:10.1038/sc.1980.36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kokoska ER, Keller MS, Rallo MC, Weber TR (2001) Characteristics of pediatric cervical spine injuries. J Pediatr Surg 36:100–105. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2001.20022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mccall T, Fassett D, Brockmeyer D (2006) Cervical spine trauma in children: a review. Neurosurg Focus 20(2):E5. doi:10.3171/foc.2006.20.2.6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mulligan RP, Friedman JA, Mahabir RC (2010) A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures. J Trauma 68(3):587–592. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b16bc5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nuñez DB, Zuluaga A, Fuentes-bernardo DA, Rivas LA, Becerra JL (1996) Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT? Radiographics 16(6):1307–1318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel JC, Tepas JJ III, Mollitt DL, Pieper P (2001) Pediatric cervical spine injuries: defining the disease. J Pediatr Surg 36:373–376. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2001.20720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rahimi SY, Stevens EA, Yeh DJ, Flannery AM, Choudhri HF, Lee MR (2003) Treatment of atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients. Neurosurg Focus 15(6):ECP1. doi:10.3171/foc.2003.15.6.7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rathore N, Eissa HM, Margolin JF, Liu H, Wu MF, Horton T et al (2012) Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients? Pediatr Hematol Oncol 29(5):415–423. doi:10.3109/08880018.2012.684198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schuster R, Waxman K, Sanchez B, Becerra S, Chung R, Conner S et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomographic results and no motor deficits. Arch Surg 140(8):762–766. doi:10.1001/archsurg.140.8.762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Mcknight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH et al (2003) The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 349(26):2510–2518. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa031375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286(15):1841–1848. doi:10.1001/jama.286.15.1841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S, Moineddin R, Charkot E, Ben DG et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36(8):823–832. doi:10.1007/s00247-006-0170-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven W. Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henry, M., Riesenburger, R.I., Kryzanski, J. et al. A retrospective comparison of CT and MRI in detecting pediatric cervical spine injury. Childs Nerv Syst 29, 1333–1338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2092-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2092-x

Keywords

Navigation