Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of past and current crop management on soil microbial biomass and activity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because soil biota is influenced by a number of factors, including land use and management techniques, changing management practices could have significant effects on the soil microbial properties and processes. An experiment was conducted to investigate differences in soil microbiological properties caused by long- and short-term management practices. Intact monolith lysimeters (0.2 m2 surface area) were taken from two sites of the same soil type that had been under long-term organic or conventional crop management and were then subjected to the same 2.5-year crop rotation [winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), maize (Zea mais L.), lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.), and rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera)] and two fertilizer regimes (following common organic and conventional practices). Soil samples were taken after crop harvest and analyzed for microbial biomass C and N, microbial activity (fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, arginine deaminase activity, and dehydrogenase activity), and total C and N. The incorporation of the green manure stimulated growth and activity of the microbial communities in soils of both management histories. Soil microbial properties did not show any differences between organically and conventionally fertilized soils, indicating that crop rotation and plant type had a larger influence on the microbial biomass and enzyme activities than fertilization. Initial differences in microbial biomass declined, while the effects of farm management history were still evident in enzyme activities and total C and N. Links between enzyme activities and microbial biomass C varied depending on treatment, indicating differences in microbial community composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:943–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alef K, Kleiner D (1986) Arginine ammonification, a simple method to estimate microbial activity potentials in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 18:233–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alef K, Kleiner D (1987) Applicability of arginine ammonification as indicator of microbial activity in different soils. Biol Fertil Soils 5:148–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton H Jr, Elliott LF, Papendick RI, Bezdicek DF (1985) Soil microbial biomass and selected soil enzyme activities: effect of fertilization and cropping practices. Soil Biol Biochem 17:297–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera ML, Beare MH (1993) Alkaline persulfate oxidation for determining total nitrogen in microbial biomass extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1007–1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KC, Smith NP, McLay CDA, Fraser PM, McPherson PJ, Harrison DF, Harbottle P (1992) Lysimeters without edge-flow: an improved design and sampling procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1625–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CA, Biederbeck VO, Wen G, Zentner RP, Schoenau J, Hahn D (1999) Seasonal trends in soil biochemical attributes: effects of crop rotation in the semiarid prairie. Can J Soil Sci 79:73–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condron LM, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Clough TJ, Forbes EA, McLaren RG, Silva RG (2000) A comparison of soil and environmental quality under organic and conventional farming systems in New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res 43:443–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick RP (1992) A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters. Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:25–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick RP (1997) Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 144–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick RP, Breakwell DP, Turco RF (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA, pp 247–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Fraser DG, Culik MN, Liebhardt WC (1988) Influence of alternative and conventional agricultural management on soil microbial processes and nitrogen availability. Am J Altern Agric 2:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DG, Doran JW, Sahs WW, Lesoing GW (1988) Soil microbial populations and activities under conventional and organic management. J Environ Qual 17:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayston SJ, Wang S, Campbell CD, Edwards CA (1998) Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30:369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunapala N, Scow KM (1998) Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and activity in conventional and organic farming systems. Soil Biol Biochem 30:805–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunapala N, Venette RC, Ferris H, Scow KM (1998) Effects of soil management history on the rate of organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1917–1927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (1999) Size and activity of the soil microbial biomass under grass and arable management. Biol Fertil Soils 30:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmann H, Thorvaldsson G (2000) Challenging targets for future agriculture. Eur J Agron 12:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Tarafdar JC (2003) 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) as electron acceptor of culturable soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes. Biol Fertil Soils 38:186–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lupwayi NZ, Rice WA, Clayton GW (1998) Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1733–1741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsabimana D, Haynes RJ, Wallis FM (2004) Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use. Appl Soil Ecol 26:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odunfa SA, Werner D (1981) Root exudates in relation to growth and nitrogenase activity of Rhizobium japonicum. Z Allg Mikrobiol 21:601–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst CE, Blair BL, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Bell MJ, Garside AL (2005) Effect of rotation breaks and organic matter amendments on the capacity of soils to develop biological suppression towards soil organisms associated with yield decline of sugarcane. Appl Soil Ecol 28:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfotzer GH, Schüler C (1995) Effects of different compost amendment on soil biotic and faunal feeding activity in an organic farming system. In: Raupp J (ed) Main effects of various organic and mineral fertilization on soil organic matter turnover and plant growth (Fertilization systems in organic farming [concerted action AIR3-CT94-1940]). Institute for Biodynamic Research, Darmstadt, Germany, pp 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson FA, Morgan WC (1996) Effects of management history and legume green manure on soil microorganisms under ‘organic’ vegetable production. Aust J Soil Res 34:427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schinner F, Öhlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R (1995) Methods in soil biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnürer J, Clarholm M, Rosswall T (1985) Microbial biomass and activity in an agricultural soil with different organic matter contents. Soil Biol Biochem 17:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon D, Sen AM, Johnson DB (2002) A comparative study of the microbiology of soils managed under organic and conventional regimes. Soil Use Manage 18:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siciliano SD, Goldie H, Germida JJ (1998) Enzymatic activity in root exudates of Dahurian wild rye (Elymus dauricus) that degrades 2-chlorobenzoic acid. J Agric Food Chem 46:5–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL (1994) Cycling of nitrogen through microbial activity. In: Hatfield JL, Stewart BA (eds) Soil biology: effects on soil quality. Lewis, Boca Raton, USA, pp 91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP, West AW (1988) Modifications to the fumigation extraction technique to permit simultaneous extraction and estimation of soil microbial C and N. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 19:327–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP, Feltham CW, Reynolds J, West AW, Singleton P (1990) Estimation of soil microbial C by a fumigation–extraction method: use on soils of high organic matter content, and a reassessment of the k ec-factor. Soil Biol Biochem 22:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark CHE, Condron LM, Stewart A, Di HJ, O’Callaghan M (2004) Small-scale spatial variability of selected soil biological properties. Soil Biol Biochem 36:601–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark C, Condron LM, Stewart A, Di HJ, O’Callaghan M (2006) Effects of past and current management practices on crop yield and nitrogen leaching - a comparison of organic and conventional cropping systems. N Z J Crop Hort Sci 34:207–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thalmann A (1968) Zur Methodik der Bestimmung der Dehydrogenaseaktivität im Boden mittels Triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC). Landwirtsch Forsch 21:249–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wander MM, Hedrick DS, Kaufman D, Traina SJ, Stinner BR, Kehrmeyer SR, White DC (1995) The functional significance of the microbial biomass in organic and conventionally managed soils. Plant Soil 170:87–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Ghani A (1995) Why is the strength of relationships between pairs of methods for estimating soil microbial biomass often so variable? Soil Biol Biochem 27:821–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson CA, Atkinson D, Gosling P, Jackson LR, Rayns FW (2002) Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use Manage 18:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the technical assistance provided by Lincoln University Analytical Services. Special thanks to Andrew McLachlan for his advice regarding the statistical analysis of the data. We also wish to express our gratitude to Rhys Minchin, Neil Smith, and Roger McLenaghen for practical help and advice. Financial support for this study was provided by the New Zealand Fertiliser Manufacturers’ Research Association and Lincoln University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Stark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stark, C., Condron, L.M., Stewart, A. et al. Effects of past and current crop management on soil microbial biomass and activity. Biol Fertil Soils 43, 531–540 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0132-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0132-3

Keywords

Navigation