Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early impacts of cotton and peanut cropping systems on selected soil chemical, physical, microbiological and biochemical properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of cropping systems of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.; Ct) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.; Pt) on a Brownfield fine sandy soil (Loamy, mixed, superactive, thermic Arenic Aridic Paleustalfs) in west Texas, United States. Samples (0–12 cm) were taken 2 and 3 years after establishment of the plots from PtPtPt, CtCtPt and PtCtCt in March, June and September 2002, and in March 2003. Soil total N and aggregate stability were generally not different among the cropping systems. The pH of the soils was >8.0. Continuous peanut increased soil organic C, microbial biomass C (Cmic) and the activities of β-glucosidase, β-glucosaminidase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, phosphodiesterase and arylsulfatase compared to the peanut-cotton rotations. The arylsulfatase activity of the fumigated field-moist soil and that resulting from the difference of the fumigated minus non-fumigated soil were greater in PtPtPt, but arylsulfatase activity of non-fumigated soil was unaffected by the cropping systems. Soil Cmic showed a different seasonal variation to enzyme activities during the study. Enzyme activities:microbial biomass ratios indicated that the microbial biomass may not have produced significant amounts of enzymes or that newly released enzymes did not become stabilized in the soil (i.e., due to its low clay and organic matter contents). Fungal (18:2ω6c and 18:1ω9c) and bacterial (15:0, a15:0, and a17:0) FAMEs were higher in PtPtPt than in CtCtPt or PtCtCt cropping systems. Our results suggest that the quality or quantity of residues returned to the soil under a peanut and cotton rotation did not impact the properties of this sandy soil after the first 3 years of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta-Martínez V, Tabatabai MA (2000) Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 31:85–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta-Martínez V, Zobeck TM, Gill TE, Kennedy AC (2003a) Enzyme activities and microbial community structure of agricultural semiarid soils. Biol Fertil Soils 38:216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta-Martínez V, Klose S, Zobeck TM (2003b) Enzyme activities in semiarid soils under conservation reserve program, native rangeland, and cropland. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta-Martínez V, Zobeck TM, Allen V (2004) Soil microbial, chemical and physical properties in continuous cotton and integrated crop-livestock systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J (in press)

  • Allen MF (1992) Mycorrhizal functioning: an integrative plant-fungal process. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea JM (1991) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza as modifier of soil fertility. Adv Soil Sci 15:2–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom DW, Monreal CM (1998) Increased enzyme activities under two row crops. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1295–1301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton H Jr, Elliot LF, Papendick RI, Bezdicek DF (1985) Soil microbial biomass and selected soil enzyme activities: effect of fertilization and cropping practices. Soil Biol Biochem 17:297–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavigelli MA, Robertson GP, Klug MJ (1995) Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles as measures of soil microbial community structure. Plant Soil 170:99–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng SP, Moore JM, Tabatabai MA (2000) Characterization of the active nitrogen pools in soils under different nitrogen cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 32:302–309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dilly O, Nannipieri P (2001) Response of ATP content, respiration rate and enzyme activities in an arable and a forest soil to nutrient additions. Biol Fertil Soils 34:64–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1977) Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 9:167–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekenler M, Tabatabai MA (2002) β-Glucosaminidase activity of soils: effect of cropping systems and its relationship to nitrogen mineralization. Biol Fertil Soils 36:367–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibekwe AM, Kennedy AC (1999) Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles as a tool to investigate community structure of two agricultural soils. Plant Soil 206:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen HH, Lucey RMN (1988) C, N, and S mineralization of crop residues as influenced by crop species and nutrient regime. Plant Soil 106:35–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper WD, Rosenau RC (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute E (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy monograph no. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis., pp 425–442

  • Kennedy AC (1999) Microbial diversity in agroecosystem quality. In: Collins WW, Qualset CO (eds) Biodiversity in agroecosystem. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 1–17

  • Klose S, Tabatabai MA (1999a) Arylsulfatase activity of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:569–574

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klose S, Tabatabai MA (1999b) Urease activity of the microbial biomass in soils. Biol Biochem Soils 31:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klose S, Tabatabai MA (2000) Urease activity of microbial biomass in soils as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 31:191–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klose S, Moore JM, Tabatabai MA (1999) Arylsulfatase activity of microbial biomass in soils as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 29:46–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klug MJ, Tiedje JM (1993) Response of microbial communities in changing environmental conditions: chemical and physiological approaches. In: Guerrero R, Pedros-Alio C (eds) Trends in microbial ecology. Spanish Society for Microbiology, Barcelona, pp 371–374

  • Lemon RG, Lee TA, Black M, Grichar WJ, Baughman T, Dotray P, Trostle C, McFarland M, Bauman P, Crumley C, Russell JS, Norman G (2001) Texas peanut production guide. Texas agricultural extension service fact sheet B-1514, Texas agricultural extension service, Lubbock, Tex.

  • Li X, Sarah P (2003) Arylsulfatase activity of soil microbial biomass along a Mediterranean-arid transect. Soil Biol Biochem 35:925–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JM, Bragg E (1985) Microorganisms and soil aggregate stability. In: Advances in soil science, vol 2. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin, pp 133–171

  • Moore JM, Klose S, Tabatabai MA (2000) Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 31:200–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and applications. Dekker, New York, pp 1–33

  • Parham JA, Deng SP (2000) Detection, quantification and characterization of β-glucosaminidase activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1183–1190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renella G, Landi L, Nannipieri P (2002) Hydrolase activities during and after chloroform fumigation of soil as affected by protease activity. Soil Biol Biochem 34:51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8.2. The SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

  • Schutter ME, Sandeno JM, Dick RP (2001) Seasonal, soil type, alternative management influences on microbial communities of vegetable cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 34:397–410

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skujins J (1991) Semiarid lands and deserts: soil resource and reclamation. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA book series no. 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis., pp 775–833

  • Turco RF, Kennedy AC, Jawson MD (1994) Microbial indicators of soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BD (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA special publication 35. SSSA and ASA, Madison, Wis., pp 73–90

  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vestal JR, White DC (1989) Lipid analysis in microbial ecology: quantitative approaches to the study of microbial communities. Bio Sci 39:535–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wienhold BJ, Halvorson AD (1998) Cropping system influences on several soil quality attributes in the northern Great Plains. J Soil Water Conserv 53:254–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Joergensen RG, Pommerening B, Chaussod R, Brookes PC (1990) Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation extraction—an autoclaved procedure. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1167–1169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plant Stress and Water Conservation Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415, USA

    V. Acosta-Martínez & D. R. Upchurch

  2. Texas A&M Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Rt. 3, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA

    A. M. Schubert, D. Porter & T. Wheeler

Authors
  1. V. Acosta-Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. R. Upchurch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. M. Schubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Porter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Acosta-Martínez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acosta-Martínez, V., Upchurch, D.R., Schubert, A.M. et al. Early impacts of cotton and peanut cropping systems on selected soil chemical, physical, microbiological and biochemical properties. Biol Fertil Soils 40, 44–54 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0745-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0745-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation