Abstract
We presented a pair of locusts flying loosely tethered with laterally looming discs. Two experiments tested whether looming-evoked flight behaviour was affected by the presence (1) or relative position (2) of a conspecific. We recorded: the type of behavioural response, motion within 6 degrees of freedom, behavioural onset time and duration, distance between individuals and relative direction of motion. Response distributions of the locust furthest from the stimulus (L1) were not affected by the presence or relative position of a conspecific, whereas distributions of the closer locust (L2) were affected by its position relative to the stimulus. Motion tracks of L1 were affected by the presence of L2, which generated relatively robust responses directed forward and away from the stimulus. Translational and rotational motion of L1 differed across treatments in both experiments, whereas L2 motion was less sensitive to the presence or position of a conspecific. The start and duration of the behaviour were invariant to the presence or position of a conspecific and locust pairs maintained a fixed distance during responses to looming. Results suggest that looming-evoked behaviour is influenced by visual cues from a conspecific in the vicinity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker PS, Gewecke M, Cooter RJ (1981) The natural flight of the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria L. III. Wing-beat frequency, flight speed and attitude. J Comp Physiol A 141:233–237
Baker PS, Gewecke M, Cooter RJ (1984) Flight orientation of swarming Locusta migratoria. Physiol Entomol 9:247–252
Ball D, Tronick E (1971) Infant responses to impending collision—optical and real. Science 171:818–820
Berger S, Kutsch W (2003) Turning manoeuvres in free-flying locusts: high-speed video-monitoring. J Exp Zool Part A Comp Exp Biol 299:127–138
Burrows M, Rowell CHF (1973) Connections between descending visual interneurons and metathoracic motoneurons in the locust. J Comp Physiol A 85:221–234
Cao P, Gu Y, Wang SR (2004) Visual neurons in the pigeon brain encode the acceleration of stimulus motion. J Neurosci 24:7690–7698
Chan RW, Gabbiani F (2013) Collision-avoidance behaviors of minimally restrained flying locusts to looming stimuli. J Exp Biol 216:641–655
Dawson JW, Dawson-Scully K, Robert D, Robertson RM (1997) Forewing asymmetries during auditory avoidance in flying locusts. J Exp Biol 200:2323–2335
Dawson JW, Kutsch W, Robertson RM (2004) Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths. J Comp Physiol A 190:69–84
Dewell RB, Gabbiani F (2012) Escape behavior: linking neural computation to action. Curr Biol 22:R152–R153. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.034
Domenici P, Batty RS (1997) Escape behaviour of solitary herring (Clupea harengus) and comparisons with schooling individuals. Mar Biol 128:29–38
Edmunds M, Brunner D (1999) Ethology of defenses against predators. In: Prete FR, Wells H, Wells PH, Hurd LE (eds) The praying mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 276–302
Ellard CG (2004) Visually guided locomotion in the gerbil: a comparison of open- and closed-loop control. Behav Brain Res 149:41–48
Farrow RA (1990) Flight and migration in Acridoids. In: Chapman RF, Joern A (eds) Biology of grasshoppers. Wiley, New York, pp 227–314
Fotowat H, Gabbiani F (2007) Relationship between the phases of sensory and motor activity during a looming-evoked multistage escape behavior. J Neurosci 27:10047–10059
Fotowat H, Fayyazuddin A, Bellen HJ, Gabbiani F (2009) A novel neuronal pathway for visually guided escape in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurophysiol 102:875–885
Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Laurent G (1999) Computation of object approach by a wide-field motion-sensitive neuron. J Neurosci 19:1122–1141
Gabbiani F, Mo CH, Laurent G (2001) Invariance of angular threshold computation in a wide-field looming-sensitive neuron. J Neurosci 21:314–329
Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Hatsopoulos NG et al (2004) Multiplication and stimulus invariance in a looming-sensitive neuron. J Physiol Paris 98:19–34
Gray JR (2005) Habituated visual neurons in locusts remain sensitive to novel looming objects. J Exp Biol 208:2515–2532
Gray JR, Lee JK, Robertson RM (2001) Activity of descending contralateral movement detector neurons and collision avoidance behaviour in response to head-on visual stimuli in locusts. J Comp Physiol A 187:115–129
Gray JR, Blincow E, Robertson R (2010) A pair of motion-sensitive neurons in the locust encode approaches of a looming object. J Comp Physiol A 196:927–938
Guest BB, Gray JR (2006) Responses of a looming-sensitive neuron to compound and paired object approaches. J Neurophysiol 95:1428–1441
Imada H, Hoki M, Suehiro Y, et al (2010) Coordinated and cohesive movement of two small conspecific fish induced by eliciting a simultaneous optomotor response. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011248
Judge SJ, Rind FC (1997) The locust DCMD, a movement-detecting neurone tightly tuned to collision trajectories. J Exp Biol 200:2209–2216
Kang H-J, Li X-H (2010) Response properties and receptive field organization of collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Neurosci Bull 26:304–316
Kennedy JS (1951) The migration of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forsk.). I. The behaviour of swarms II. A theory of long-range migrations. Phil Trans R Soc (Lond) B 235:163–290
Krapp HG, Gabbiani F (2005) Spatial distribution of inputs and local receptive field properties of a wide-field, looming sensitive neuron. J Neurophysiol 93:2240–2253
Krapp HG, Hengstenberg B, Hengstenberg R (1998) Dendritic structure and receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly. J Neurophysiol 79:1902–1917
Kullberg C, Jakobsson S, Fransson T (1998) Predator-induced take-off strategy in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 265:1659–1664
Libersat F, Hoy RR (1991) Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 169:507–514
Lind J, Kaby U, Jakobsson S (2002) Split-second escape decisions in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Naturwissenschaften 89:420–423
Maier JX, Neuhoff JG, Logothetis NK, Ghazanfar AA (2004) Multisensory integration of looming signals by Rhesus monkeys. Neuron 43:177–181
McMillan GA, Gray JR (2012) A looming-sensitive pathway responds to changes in the trajectory of object motion. J Neurophysiol 108:1052–1068
McMillan GA, Loessin V, Gray JR (2013) Bilateral flight muscle activity predicts wing kinematics and 3-dimensional body orientation of locusts responding to looming objects. J Exp Biol 216:3369–3380
Nakagawa H, Hongjian K (2010) Collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. J Neurophysiol 104:2487–2499
Oliva D, Medan V, Tomsic D (2007) Escape behavior and neuronal responses to looming stimuli in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus (Decapoda: Grapsidae). J Exp Biol 210:865–880
O’Shea M, Williams JLD (1974) The anatomy and output connections of a locust visual interneurone: the lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) neurone. J Comp Physiol 91:257–266
Parrish JK, Viscido SV, Grünbaum D (2002) Self-organized fish schools: an examination of emergent properties. Biol Bull 202:296–305
Paskins KE, Bowyer A, Megill WM, Scheibe JS (2007) Take-off and landing forces and the evolution of controlled gliding in northern flying squirrels Glaucomys sabrinus. J Exp Biol 210:1413–1423
Preiss R (1992) Set point of retinal velocity of ground images in the control of swarming flight of desert locusts. J Comp Physiol A 171:251–256
Preiss R, Spork P (1993) Flight-phase and visual-field related optomotor yaw responses in gregarious desert locusts during tethered flight. J Comp Physiol A 172:733–740
Preuss T, Osei-Bonsu PE, Weiss SA et al (2006) Neural representation of object approach in a decision-making motor circuit. J Neurosci 26:3454–3464
Rind FC, Simmons PJ (1997) Signaling of object approach by the DCMD neuron of the locust. J Neurophysiol 77:1029–1033
Robertson RM, Johnson AG (1993a) Collision avoidance of flying locusts: steering torques and behaviour. J Exp Biol 183:35–60
Robertson RM, Johnson AG (1993b) Retinal image size triggers obstacle avoidance in flying locusts. Naturwissenschaften 80:176–178
Robertson RM, Reye DN (1992) Wing movements associated with collision-avoidance manoeuvers during flight in the locust Locusta migratoria. J Exp Biol 163:231–258
Robertson RM, Kunhert CT, Dawson JW (1996) Thermal avoidance during flight in the locust Locusta migratoria. J Exp Biol 199:1383–1393
Rogers SM, Harston GWJ, Kilburn-Toppin F et al (2010) Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of a looming-sensitive neuron in solitarious and gregarious phases of the desert locust. J Neurophysiol 103:779–792
Santer RD, Simmons PJ, Rind FC (2005a) Gliding behaviour elicited by lateral looming stimuli in flying locusts. J Comp Physiol A 191:61–73
Santer RD, Yamawaki Y, Rind FC, Simmons PJ (2005b) Motor activity and trajectory control during escape jumping in the locust Locusta migratoria. J Comp Physiol A 191:965–975
Santer RD, Rind FC, Stafford R, Simmons PJ (2006) Role of an identified looming-sensitive neuron in triggering a flying locust’s escape. J Neurophysiol 95:3391–3400
Schiff W, Caviness JA, Gibson JJ (1962) Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of “looming”. Science 136:982–983
Simmons PJ (1980) Connexions between a movement-detecting visual interneurone and flight motoneurones of a locust. J Exp Biol 86:87–97
Simmons PJ, Rind FC (1992) Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects. J Neurophysiol 68:1667–1682
Spork P, Preiss R (1993) Control of flight by means of lateral visual-stimuli in gregarious desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria. Physiol Entomol 18:195–203
Straw AD (2008) Vision Egg: an open-source library for realtime visual stimulus generation. Front Neuroinform 4:12
Sugiura H, Dickinson MH (2009) The generation of forces and moments during visual-evoked steering maneuvers in flying Drosophila. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004883
Sun H, Frost BJ (1998) Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nat Neurosci 1:296–303
Uvarov BP (1977) Grasshoppers and locusts. In: A handbook of general acridology, vol 2. Behaviour, ecology, biogeography, population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and Centre for Overseas Pest Research, London
Verspui R, Gray JR (2009) Visual stimuli induced by self-motion and object-motion modify odour-guided flight of male moths (Manduca sexta L.). J Exp Biol 212:3272–3282
Wylie D, Frost BJ (1999) Responses of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root to translational and rotational flowfields. J Neurophysiol 81:267–276
Yamamoto K, Nakata M, Nakagawa H (2003) Input and output characteristics of collision avoidance behavior in the frog Rana catesbeiana. Brain Behav Evol 62:201–211
Yamawaki Y, Toh Y (2009) Responses of descending neurons to looming stimuli in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia. J Comp Physiol A 195:253–264
Acknowledgments
Funding provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, and the University of Saskatchewan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
359_2014_916_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Figure 1 Two-dimensional motion tracks from Experiment 1 with the azimuthal (top panels) and elevation (bottom panels) planes of L1 (n = 19) and L2 (n = 19) separated into active steering (black lines) and non-steering (glide or startle, grey lines) behaviours. Data were aligned relative to the initial position at the start of the recording (x, y, z coordinates = 0,0,0) and represent motion tracks during the behavioural epoch. Inset in each graph plot shows the average motion vectors from all animals during the first 2 frames of the behavioural epoch. For all data positive (negative) deviations along the x, y and z axis represent movement to the right (left), up (down) or forward (back), respectively. The data show that active steering resulted in greater excursions in the x-plane compared to glides or startle responses and average vectors show more pronounced motion to the left (away from the stimulus). Nevertheless, glides and startle responses also resulted in excursions within the x-plane that were, on average for L2, to the left. For L1, irrespective of response type, and L2 non-steering behaviours, motion within the y-plane was maintained along the longitudinal midline (i.e. motion was primarily forward with little change in altitude). Active steering in L2 resulted in an average decrease in altitude. (PDF 68 kb)
359_2014_916_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Figure 2. Two-dimensional motion tracks from Experiment 2 within the azimuthal (top panels) and elevation (bottom panels) planes of L1 (n = 18) and L2 (n = 18) separated into active steering (black lines) and non-steering (glide or startle, grey lines) behaviours. Data were aligned relative to the initial position at the start of the recording (x, y, z coordinates = 0,0,0) and represent motion tracks during the behavioural epoch. Inset in each graph plot shows the average motion vectors from all animals during the first two frames of the behavioural epoch. For all data positive (negative) deviations along the x, y and z axis represent movement to the right (left), up (down) or forward (back), respectively. The data show similar trends as described in Supplementary Figure 1 except that the average motion vector for L1 in the azimuthal plane aligned with 0 in the x axis. (PDF 67 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benaragama, I., Gray, J.R. Responses of a pair of flying locusts to lateral looming visual stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 200, 723–738 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0916-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0916-0