Abstract
The hymenopteran tarsus is equipped with claws and a movable adhesive pad (arolium). Even though both organs are specialised for substrates of different roughness, they are moved by the same muscle, the claw flexor. Here we show that despite this seemingly unfavourable design, the use of arolium and claws can be adjusted according to surface roughness by mechanical control. Tendon pull experiments in ants (Oecophylla smaragdina) revealed that the claw flexor elicits rotary movements around several (pre-) tarsal joints. However, maximum angular change of claws, arolium and fifth tarsomere occurred at different pulling amplitudes, with arolium extension always being the last movement. This effect indicates that arolium use is regulated non-neuronally. Arolium unfolding can be suppressed on rough surfaces, when claw tips interlock and inhibit further contraction of the claw flexor or prevent legs from sliding towards the body. To test whether this hypothesised passive control operates in walking ants, we manipulated ants by clipping claw tips. Consistent with the proposed control mechanism, claw pruning resulted in stronger arolium extension on rough but not on smooth substrates. The control of attachment by the insect claw flexor system demonstrates how mechanical systems in the body periphery can simplify centralised, neuro-muscular feedback control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM (1971) Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In: Proceedings of the symposium on close-range photogrammetry. American Society of Photogrammetry, Falls Church, VA, pp 1–18
Albert J, Friedrich O, Dechant H-E, Barth F (2001) Arthropod touch reception: spider hair sensilla as rapid touch detectors. J Comp Physiol A 187:303–312. doi:10.1007/s003590100202
Andersen SO, Weis-Fogh I (1964) Resilin: a rubber-like protein in arthropodal cuticle. Adv Insect Physiol 2:1–65
Arnold JW (1974) Adaptive features on the tarsi of cockroaches (Insecta: Dictyoptera). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 3:317–334
Autumn K, Buehler M, Cutkosky M, Fearing B, Full RJ, Goldroan D, Groff R, Provancher W, Rizzi AA, Saranli U, Saunders A, Koditschek DE (2005) Robotics in scansorial environments. Proc SPIE 5804:291–302. doi:10.1117/12.606157
Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, Spenko M, Cutkosky M (2006) Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment. J Exp Biol 209:3569–3579 doi:10.1242/jeb.02486
Basibuyuk HH, Quicke DLJ, Rasnitsyn AP, Fitton MG (2000) Morphology and sensilla of the orbicula, a sclerite between the tarsal claws, in the Hymenoptera. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:625–636
Bennet-Clark HC, Lucey ECA (1967) The jump of the flea: a study of the energetics and a model of the mechanism. J Exp Biol 47:59–76
Betz O (2003) Structure of the tarsi in some Stenus species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): external morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion. J Morphol 255:24–43. doi:10.1002/jmor.10044
Biewener AA, Full RJ (1992) Force platform and kinematic analysis. In: Biewener AA (ed) Biomechanics: structures and systems a practical approach. IRL at Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 45–73
Brown IE, Loeb GE (2000) A reductionist approach to creating and using neuromusculoskeletal models. In: Winters JM, Crago PE (eds) Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement. Springer, New York, pp 148–163
Cruse H, Brunn DE, Bartling C, Dean J, Dreifert M, Kindermann T, Schmitz J (1995) Walking: a complex behavior controlled by simple networks. Adapt Behav 3:385–418
Dai Z, Gorb SN, Schwarz U (2002) Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol 205:2479–2488
Daltorio KA, Gorb S, Peressadko A, Horchler AD, Ritzmann RE, Quinn RD (2005) A robot that climbs walls using micro-structured polymer fet. In: International conference on climbing and walking robots (CLAWAR), London, 13–15 Sept 2005
Delcomyn F (1999) Walking robots and the central and peripheral control of locomotion in insects. Auton Robots 7:259–270
Dellit W-D (1934) Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Geckozehe. Jenaische Zeitschrift fuer Naturwissenschaft 68:613–656
Dickinson MH, Farley CT, Full RJ, Koehl MAR, Kram R, Lehman S (2000) How animals move: an integrative view. Science 288:100–106
Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, Hölldobler B (2001) Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6215–6220
Federle W, Endlein T (2004) Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:67–75 doi:10.1016/j.asd.2003.11.001
Frantsevich L, Gorb S (2002) Arcus as a tensegrity structure in the arolium of wasps (Hymentoptera: Vespidae). Zoology 105:225–237
Frantsevich L, Gorb S (2004) Structure and mechanics of the tarsal chain in the hornet, Vespa crabro (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): implications on the attachment mechanism. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:77–89. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2003.10.003
Frazier SF, Larsen GS, Neff D, Quimby L, Carney M, DiCaprio RA, Zill SN (1999) Elasticity and movements of the cockroach tarsus in walking. J Comp Physiol A 185:157–172. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2003.10.003
Gnatzy W, Hustert R (1989) Mechanoreceptors in behaviour. In: Huber F, Moore TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket behaviour and neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 198–226
Gorb S (2001) Attachment devices of insect cuticle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Gorb SN (1996) Design of insect unguitractor apparatus. J Morphol 230:219–230
Gorb SN (2004) The jumping mechanism of cicada Cercopis vulnerata (Auchenorrhyncha, Cercopidae): skeleton-muscle organisation, frictional surfaces, and inverse-kinematic model of leg movements. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:201–220
Goyret J, Raguso RA (2006) The role of mechanosensory input in flower handling efficiency and learning by Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 209:1585–1593
Greuter M, Shah G, Caprari G, Tâche F, Siegwart R, Sitti M (2005) Toward micro wall-climbing robots using biomimetic fibrillar adhesives. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on autonomous minirobots for research and edutainment (AMiRE 2005), Awara-Spa, Fukui, pp 39–46
Hooke R (1665) Micrographia. John Martyn and James Allestry, Printers to the Royal Society, London. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/15491
Jindrich DL, Full RJ (2002) Dynamic stabilization of rapid hexapedal locomotion. J Exp Biol 205:2803–2823
Kevan PG, Lane MA (1985) Flower petal microtexture is a tactile cue for bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4750–4752
Koditschek DE, Full RJ, Buehler M (2004) Mechanical aspects of legged locomotion control. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:251–272
Kubow TM, Full RJ (1999) The role of the mechanical system in control: a hypothesis of self-stabilization in hexapedal runners. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 354:849–861
Larsen GS, Frazier SF, Zill SN (1997) The tarso-pretarsal chordotonal organ as an element in cockroach walking. J Comp Physiol A 180:683–700
Matsushita K, Lungarella M, Paul C, Yokoi H (2005) Locomoting with less computation but more morphology. In: International conference on robotics and automation, to be held in Barcelona, Spain
Menon C, Murphy M, Sitti M (2004) Gecko inspired surface climbing robots. IEEE International conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), Shenyang, China, Aug 2004
Paul C (2006) Morphological computation: a basis for the analysis of morphology and control requirements. Robot Auton Syst 54:619–630 doi:10.1016/j.robot.2006.03.003
Radnikow G, Bässler U (1991) Function of a muscle whose apodeme travels through a joint moved by other muscles: why the retractor unguis muscle in stick insects is tripartite and has no antagonist. J Exp Biol 157:87–99
Ritzmann RE (1974) Mechanisms for the snapping behavior of two alpheid shrimp, Alpheus californiensis and Alpheus heterochelis. J Comp Physiol A 95:217–236
Scherge M, Gorb SN (2001) Biological micro- and nanotribology: nature’s solutions. Springer, Berlin
Seidl T, Wehner R (2006) Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants. J Exp Biol 209:3336–3344 doi:10.1242/jeb.02364
Sitti M, Fearing RS (2003) Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol 17:1055–1073
Slifer EH (1950) Vulnerable areas on the surface of the tarsus and pretarsus of the grasshopper (Acrididae, Orthoptera) with special reference to the arolium. Ann Entomol Soc Am 43:173–188
Snodgrass RE (1935) Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
Snodgrass RE (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
von Wittich W (1854) Der Mechanismus der Haftzehen von Hyla arborea. Müllers Arch f Anat u Physiol 1854:170–183
Walther C (1969) Zum Verhalten des Krallenbeugersystems bei der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus Br. Zeitschr vergl Physiol 62:421–460
West T (1862) The foot of the fly; its structure and action: elucidated by comparison with the feet of other insects. Trans Linn Soc 23:393–421
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by a postgraduate scholarship from the University of Wuerzburg to TE and by research grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 567/C6 and Emmy-Noether Fellowship FE 547/1 to WF) as well as the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. We thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
We model the pretarsus as a system of limbs connected with joints containing torsion springs (Figs. 3c, 6). The torsion springs are located (1) at the unguifer, where the manubrium is hinged, (2) at the distal end of the manubrium, around which the arcus rotates; and (3) at the flexible connection between unguitractor plate and planta.
Direction of force relative to tarsus axis
The claw flexor muscle produces a force F along its tendon, which acts to move the unguitractor plate proximally into the last tarsal segment. This force can be divided into a translational and a rotational component:
We model the anterior ventral margin of the last tarsomere as a frictionless pivot so that the combination of F rot and F trans gives rise to a force F* which deflects torsion spring (3) at the flexible connection between unguitractor plate and planta and pushes upward (dorsally) at the end of the planta, where the arcus is hinged. The lever arm l* on the distal side of the pivot is l* and its angle to the other side of the pivot is ω1.
The ratio between the lever arms on both sides of the pivot is \( {l_{1} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{l_{1} } {l*}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {l^*}. \) The magnitude of F* can be obtained by adding \( F_{{\text{rot}}} \cdot {l_{1} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{l_{1} } {l^*}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {l^*} \) and F trans vectorially:
To find the direction of \( {\overrightarrow{{F^*}}} \) relative to the tarsus, the angle β2 is calculated from:
and the angle γ from:
Effective lever arm
The force F* elicits both a proximal rotation of the manubrium (joint 1) and an extension of the arolium (joint 2). We determined the lever arms H 1 and H 2 around both joints (i.e. the distance of vector \( {\overrightarrow{{F^*}}} \) to the unguifer and the arcus base, respectively). The “effective lever arms” of the arolium and manubrium joints can be calculated as the torsional moment \( F^{*} \cdot H_{\text{i}} \) divided by the tendon force F.
Insufficiency of the model
Our simple model does not correctly predict the rotation of the manubrium. During the claw flexor contraction, the predicted force vector \( {\overrightarrow{{F^*}}} \) did not consistently point in the proximal direction but it was sometimes oriented distally (i.e. H 1 was negative), suggesting that the manubrium undergoes proximal and distal movements while the claw flexor is contracting. However, our observations show that the manubrium only moves proximally when the claw flexor contracts. We assume that this behaviour is due to a spring-like connection between the unguitractor plate and the manubrium (indicated by the dotted spring in Figs. 3c and 6). Morphologically, this spring represents the elastic cuticle connection of the unguitractor plate via the claws to the claws and the unguifer. This spring may also be responsible for the fact that at the beginning of the claw flexor contraction (when the unguitractor plate is still not in contact with the anterior ventral margin of the fifth tarsomere), the plate rotates away from the direction of the tendon pull.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Endlein, T., Federle, W. Walking on smooth or rough ground: passive control of pretarsal attachment in ants. J Comp Physiol A 194, 49–60 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-007-0287-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-007-0287-x