Skip to main content
Log in

A Note on the Separability Principle in Economies with Single-Peaked Preferences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of allocating an infinitely divisible commodity among a group of agents with single-peaked preferences. A rule that has played a central role in the analysis of the problem is the so-called uniform rule. Chun (2001) proves that the uniform rule is the only rule satisfying Pareto optimality, no-envy, separability, and Ω-continuity. We obtain an alternative characterization by using a weak replication-invariance condition, called duplication-invariance, instead of Ω-continuity. Furthermore, we prove that the equal division lower bound and separability imply no-envy. Using this result, we strengthen one of Chun’s (2001) characterizations of the uniform rule by showing that the uniform rule is the only rule satisfying Pareto optimality, the equal division lower bound, separability, and either Ω-continuity or duplication-invariance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benassy JP (1982) The economics of market equilibrium. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching S (1992) A simple characterization of the uniform rule. Econ Lett 40:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welfare 11:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun Y (1999) Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems. Int J Game Theory 28:511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun Y (2000) Agreement, separability, and other axioms for quasi-linear social choice problems. Soc Choice Welfare 17:507–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun Y (2003) One-sided population monotonicity, separability, and the uniform rule. Econ Lett 78:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun Y (2006) The separability principle in economies with single-peaked preferences. Soc Choice Welfare (forthcoming)

  • Dagan N (1996) A note on Thomson’s characterizations of the uniform rule. J Econ Theory 69:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley D (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7:45–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus B (1998) Fair allocation and reallocation: an axiomatic study. Ph.D Thesis, Maastricht University

  • Moulin H (1987) Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods. Int J Game Theory 16:161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez T (1994) Consistency, monotonicity, and the uniform rule. Econ Lett 46:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica 59:509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (1994a) Consistent solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. J Econ Theory 63:219–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (1994b) Resource-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Soc Choice Welfare 11:205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (1995) Population-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked. Econ Theory 5:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (1997) The replacement principle in economies with single-peaked preferences. J Econ Theory 76:145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (2006) The theory of fair allocation. Princeton University Press (forthcoming)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bettina Klaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klaus, B. A Note on the Separability Principle in Economies with Single-Peaked Preferences. Soc Choice Welfare 26, 255–261 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0096-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0096-0

Keywords

Navigation