Abstract
The disadvantages of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as compared with ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy include increased blood loss, greater pain, and longer hospital stay. A 13-Fr “mini-perc” technique using a ureteroscopy sheath for PCNL was developed in an attempt to address these drawbacks. Nine “mini-percs” have been performed in patients aged 40–73 years with stone burdens of ≤ 2 cm2. On average, patients had 1.4 stones with a cross-sectional area of 1.5 cm2. The mean total procedure time, estimated blood loss, and hematocrit decrease were 176 min, 83 ml, and 6.6%, respectively. On average, patients used 14 mg of parenteral morphine and stayed 1.7 days in the hospital. There was no procedure-related complication or transfusion. Eight of nine kidneys (89%) were stone-free on early follow-up at a mean of 3.8 weeks. As compared with standard PCNL, the “mini-perc” technique has similar early success rates in selected patients and may offer advantages with respect to hemorrhage, postoperative pain, and shortened hospital stays.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackman, S., Docimo, S., Cadeddu, J. et al. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16, 371–374 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050083
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050083