Skip to main content
Log in

The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The disadvantages of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as compared with ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy include increased blood loss, greater pain, and longer hospital stay. A 13-Fr “mini-perc” technique using a ureteroscopy sheath for PCNL was developed in an attempt to address these drawbacks. Nine “mini-percs” have been performed in patients aged 40–73 years with stone burdens of ≤ 2 cm2. On average, patients had 1.4 stones with a cross-sectional area of 1.5 cm2. The mean total procedure time, estimated blood loss, and hematocrit decrease were 176 min, 83 ml, and 6.6%, respectively. On average, patients used 14 mg of parenteral morphine and stayed 1.7 days in the hospital. There was no procedure-related complication or transfusion. Eight of nine kidneys (89%) were stone-free on early follow-up at a mean of 3.8 weeks. As compared with standard PCNL, the “mini-perc” technique has similar early success rates in selected patients and may offer advantages with respect to hemorrhage, postoperative pain, and shortened hospital stays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackman, S., Docimo, S., Cadeddu, J. et al. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16, 371–374 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050083

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050083

Keywords

Navigation