Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the role of a complete transurethral resection of bladder tumors (c-TURBT) on oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy (RC) and its relationship with adverse pathological features.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed data of 727 patients treated with RC and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection at three tertiary referral centers. Possible c-TURBT was reported by the treating surgeon. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the relationship of c-TURBT and survival outcomes after surgery in 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort adjusted for age and gender. Moreover, multivariable logistic regression (MVA) was built to predict the relationship between c-TURBT and pT3–T4 stages at RC, lymph node invasion (LNI) and positive soft tissue surgical margin (STSM).
Results
A total of 433 (60%) patients received a c-TURBT. 3.0% of patients with a c-TURBT achieved a pT0–pTa–pTis status vs. 2.0% of patients with incomplete TURBT. At multivariable Cox regression analyses, c-TURBT was not associated with survival outcomes. At MVA, incompleteness of TURBT was significantly associated with a pT3–T4 stage [odds ratio (OR) 8.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.33–27.67, p = 0.001]. No significant association was found between c-TURBT, LNI and STSM.
Conclusion
We found a low rate of achievement of pT0 stage at RC. An incomplete TURBT before RC represented a predictor of pT3–T4 stages, but no effect of a c-TURBT was shown on survival outcomes. Given the current inadequacy of clinical staging strategies with more than 50% of extravesical disease being under-staged, our results could improve patients selection for NAC, driving the decision-making in doubtful cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM et al (2017) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol 71:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041
Mariappan P, Finney SM, Head E, Somani BK, Zachou A, Smith G et al (2012) Good quality white-light transurethral resection of bladder tumours (GQ-WLTURBT) with experienced surgeons performing complete resections and obtaining detrusor muscle reduces early recurrence in new non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: validation across time and place and recommendation for benchmarking. BJU Int 109:1666–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10571.x
Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U, Altok M, Zorlu F (2010) Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 58:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.007
Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, Dreicer R, Kamat AM, Lerner SP et al (2017) Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO guideline. J Urol 198:552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.086
Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM et al (2017) Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol 71:462–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020
Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torloni H, World Health Organization (1973) Histological typing of urinary bladder tumours. In: Mostofi FK (ed) Collaboration with Sobin LH, Torloni H, and pathologists in fourteen countries. World Health Organization, Geneva
Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A (2005) The 2004 WHO classification of bladder tumors: a summary and commentary. Int J Surg Pathol 13:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/106689690501300203
Shariat SF, Svatek RS, Tilki D, Skinner E, Karakiewicz PI, Capitanio U et al (2010) International validation of the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in patients treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int 105:1402–1412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09217.x
Moschini M, D’Andrea D, Korn S, Irmak Y, Soria F, Compérat E et al (2017) Characteristics and clinical significance of histological variants of bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 14:651–668. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.125
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. In: Greene FL (eds). Springer (2018). https://www.springer.com/us/book/9781475736564. Accessed 3 Oct 2018
Brausi M, Collette L, Kurth K, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA et al (2002) Variability in the recurrence rate at first follow-up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a combined analysis of seven EORTC studies. Eur Urol 41:523–531
Avallone MA, Sack BS, El-Arabi A, Charles DK, Herre WR, Radtke AC et al (2017) Ten-year review of perioperative complications after transurethral resection of bladder tumors: analysis of monopolar and plasmakinetic bipolar cases. J Endourol 31:767–773. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0056
Comploj E, Dechet CB, Mian M, Trenti E, Palermo S, Lodde M et al (2014) Perforation during TUR of bladder tumours influences the natural history of superficial bladder cancer. World J Urol 32:1219–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1197-x
Herkommer K, Hofer C, Gschwend JE, Kron M, Treiber U (2012) Gender and body mass index as risk factors for bladder perforation during primary transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Urol 187:1566–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.114
Balbay MD, Cimentepe E, Unsal A, Bayrak O, Koç A, Akbulut Z (2005) The actual incidence of bladder perforation following transurethral bladder surgery. J Urol 174:2260–2262. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000181811.61199.35(discussion 2262–2263)
Adiyat KT, Katkoori D, Soloway CT, De los Santos R, Manoharan M, Soloway MS (2010) “Complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor”: are the guidelines being followed? Urology 75:365–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.082
Lee SE, Jeong IG, Ku JH, Kwak C, Lee E, Jeong JS (2004) Impact of transurethral resection of bladder tumor: analysis of cystectomy specimens to evaluate for residual tumor. Urology 63:873–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.12.035(discussion 877)
Mowatt G, N’Dow J, Vale L, Nabi G, Boachie C, Cook JA et al (2011) Photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer compared with white light cystoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462310001364
Cauberg ECC, Kloen S, Visser M, de la Rosette JJMCH, Babjuk M, Soukup V et al (2010) Narrow band imaging cystoscopy improves the detection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urology 76:658–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.075
Hahn RG (1995) Transurethral resection syndrome after transurethral resection of bladder tumours. Can J Anaesth 42:69–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03010574
Herr HW (1999) The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumors. J Urol 162:74–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199907000-00018
Haleblian GE, Skinner EC, Dickinson MG, Lieskovsky G, Boyd SD, Skinner DG (1998) Hydronephrosis as a prognostic indicator in bladder cancer patients. J Urol 160:2011–2014
Bartsch GC, Kuefer R, Gschwend JE, de Petriconi R, Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG (2007) Hydronephrosis as a prognostic marker in bladder cancer in a cystectomy-only series. Eur Urol 51:690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.009(discussion 697–698)
Culp SH, Dickstein RJ, Grossman HB, Pretzsch SM, Porten S, Daneshmand S et al (2014) Refining patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. J Urol 191:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.061
Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S et al (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19:666–675. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666
Bruins HM, Huang GJ, Cai J, Skinner DG, Stein JP, Penson DF (2009) Clinical outcomes and recurrence predictors of lymph node positive urothelial cancer after cystectomy. J Urol 182:2182–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.017
Umbreit EC, Crispen PL, Shimko MS, Farmer SA, Blute ML, Frank I (2010) Multifactorial, site-specific recurrence model after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 116:3399–3407. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SZ contributed to manuscript writing, statistical analyses and data collection. MM contributed to project development, data collection and drafting of the manuscript. AG contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. RC contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. FM contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. AB contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. AS contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. AA contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. CS contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. SB contributed to drafting of the manuscript. LC contributed to drafting of the manuscript. AM contributed to critical revision of the manuscript. PB contributed to project development, supervision and critical revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
All persons gave their informed consent to use their data for this retrospective study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamboni, S., Moschini, M., Gallina, A. et al. The impact of completeness of last transurethral resection of bladder tumors on the outcomes of radical cystectomy. World J Urol 37, 2707–2714 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02734-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02734-6