Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting ureteral stones in emergency department patients with flank pain: an external validation of the STONE score

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The ability to objectively predict which emergency department patients are likely to have a ureteral stone may aid in cost-effectiveness and patient-centered diagnostic imaging decisions. We performed an external validation of the STONE score, a clinical prediction rule for the presence of uncomplicated ureteral stones in emergency department patients developed at Yale University School of Medicine.

Methods

Five hundred thirty-six (536) consecutive patients evaluated in an urban tertiary care emergency department for the possible diagnosis of ureteral stone were retrospectively reviewed. The STONE score uses five factors (gender, duration of pain, race, nausea/vomiting, erythrocytes on urine dipstick) to categorize patients into low, medium, and high probability of having a ureteral stone. The total STONE score risk is 0–13 and divided into three groups: low risk = 0–5, moderate risk = 6–9, and high risk = 10–13.

Results

Of the 536 patients evaluated for suspected ureteral stone, 257 (47.8 %) had a ureteral stone. Mean patient age was 45.9 years (SD 16.3), and gender distribution was 43.9 % female and 56.1 % male. Distribution of STONE score risk was 24.1 % low, 48.1 % moderate, and 27.7 % high. Diagnosis of ureteral stone by STONE score risk was 14 % for low-risk group, 48.3 % for moderate-risk group, and 75.8 % for high-risk group. This distribution is consistent with internal validation at Yale University School of Medicine, where values were 8.3–9.2 % for low risk, 51.3–51.6 % for moderate risk, and 88.6–89.6 % for high risk.

Conclusions

Our study validates the use of the STONE clinical score to categorize patients as low, moderate, and high risk for ureteral stone. This could help guide development of clinical decision rules for diagnostic studies and imaging in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Urologic diseases in America project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG et al (2014) Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol 192(2):316–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rule AD, Lieske JC, Li X, Melton LJ III, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ (2014) The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode. J Am Soc Nephrol 25(12):2878–2886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fwu CW, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Kusek JW, Kirkali Z (2013) Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int 83(3):479–486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown J (2006) Diagnostic and treatment patterns for renal colic in US emergency departments. Int Urol Nephrol 38(1):87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore CL, Bomann S, Daniels B et al (2014) Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone—the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies. BMJ 348:g2191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinberg PL, Nangia AK, Curtis K (2011) A standardized pain management protocol improves timeliness of analgesia among emergency department patients with renal colic. Qual Manag Health Care 20(1):30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J et al (2014) Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med 371(12):1100–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisner BH, McQuaid JW, Hyams E, Matlaga BR (2011) Nephrolithiasis: what surgeons need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):1274–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borofsky MS, Walter D, Shah O, Goldfarb DS, Mues AC, Makarov DV (2013) Surgical decompression is associated with decreased mortality in patients with sepsis and ureteral calculi. J Urol 189(3):946–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Hernandez and Song developed the protocol/project, collected data, and wrote the manuscript. Noble developed the protocol/project, managed data, and edited the manuscript. Eisner developed the protocol/project, collected and managed the data, and wrote and edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian H. Eisner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest associated with the writing of this manuscript. Brian Eisner is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Bard, Olympus, Allena, Retrophin, and an owner of the Ravine Group. Other authors have no disclosures.

Ethical standards

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained prior to the initiation of the study. A waiver of informed consent was obtained from the IRB due to the minimal risk posed to patients.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez, N., Song, Y., Noble, V.E. et al. Predicting ureteral stones in emergency department patients with flank pain: an external validation of the STONE score. World J Urol 34, 1443–1446 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1760-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1760-3

Keywords

Navigation