Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of a new device for intravesical thermochemotherapy in non-grade 3 BCG recurrent NMIBC: a phase I–II study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We report for the first time the activity and safety of Unithermia® (Elmedical Ltd, Hod-Hasharon, Israel), a novel device for administration of MMC-C with hyperthermia (HT), that employs conductive heating, in a series of non-grade 3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) that failed Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG).

Methods

Patients with non-grade 3 NMIBC recurring after at least a full induction course of BCG were eligible for this phase I–II prospective single-arm study. Six weekly instillations with Unithermia® were scheduled following complete TUR. Primary end points were treatment safety and response rate (RR), and the latter defined as the absence of any unfavourable outcome at 12 months. Any grade 3 and/or muscle-invasive (T > 1) recurrence was considered disease progression. Kaplan–Meier estimation of the time to recurrence and progression, cancer-specific survival and overall survival was taken as secondary end points.

Results

Thirty-four eligible patients entered the study between January 2009 and April 2011. RR was documented in 20/34 (59 %). Among the 14/34 (41 %) non-responders, four developed G3 disease, one developed carcinoma in situ, and one progressed to muscle-invasive bladder cancer, with an overall 18 % progression rate at 1 year. At a median follow-up of 41 months, recurrence and progression rates were 35.3 and 23.5 %, respectively. Toxicity did not go beyond grade 2 except in five cases.

Conclusions

Initial experience with MMC-HT with Unithermia® showed an interesting activity and safety profile in non-grade 3 NMIBC recurring after BCG, suggesting a role as second-line therapy in this selected subgroup of NMIBC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R et al (2013) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol 64(4):639–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin FM, Kamat AM (2009) Definition and management of patients with bladder cancer who fail BCG therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:815–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall MC, Chang SS, Dalbagni G et al (2007) Guideline for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1 and Tis): 2007 update. J Urol 178(6):2314–2330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerner SP, Tangen CM, Sucharew H et al (2009) Failure to achieve a complete response to induction BCG therapy is associated with increased risk of disease worsening and death in patients with high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 27:155–159

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallagher BL, Joudi FN, Maymi JL et al (2008) Impact of previous bacilli Calmette-Guerin failure pattern on subsequent response to bacilli Calmette-Guerin plus interferon intravesical therapy. Urology 71:297–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yates DR, Brausi MA, Catto JW et al (2012) Treatment options available for bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 62:1088–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sternberg IA, Dalbagni G, Chen LY et al (2013) Intravesical gemcitabine for high risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment failure. J Urol 190(5):1686–1691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Heijden AG, Verhaegh G, Jansen CF et al (2005) Effect of hyperthermia on the cytotoxicity of 4 chemotherapeutic agents currently used for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: an in vitro study. J Urol 173:1375–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colombo R, Da Pozzo LF, Lev A et al (1996) Neoadjuvant combined microwave induced local hyperthermia and topical chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 155:1227–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colombo R, Salonia A, Leib Z et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing thermochemotherapy with mitomycin-C alone as adjuvant treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). BJU Int 107(6):912–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nativ O, Witjes JA, Hendricksen K et al (2009) Combined thermo-chemotherapy for recurrent bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J Urol 182:1313–1317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lammers RJ, Witjes JA, Inman BA et al (2011) The role of a combined regimen with intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia in the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 60:81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slater SE, Patel P, Viney R et al (2014) The effects and effectiveness of electromotive drug administration and chemohyperthermia for treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96(6):415–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colombo R, Salonia A, Da Pozzo LF et al (2003) Combination of intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: preliminary clinical experience. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 47(2):127–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A et al (2003) CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Milla P, Fiorito C, Soria F et al (2014) Intravesical thermo-chemotherapy based on conductive heat: a first pharmacokinetic study with mitomycin C in superficial transitional cell carcinoma patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73(3):503–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamat AM, Witjes JA, Brausi M et al (2014) Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 192(2):305–315

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones G, Cleves A, Wilt TJ et al (2012) Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD00929

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad SM, Eyre S, Loughlin KR (2013) Salvage combination intravesical immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and interferon-α2B: impact on recurrence, progression, and survival. Hosp Pract (1995) 41(4):31-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dahm-Daphi J, Brammer I, Dikomey E (1997) Heat effects on the repair of DNA double strand breaks in CHO cells. Int J Radiat Biol 72:171–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paroni R et al (2001) Effect of local hyperthermia of the bladder on mitomycin C pharmacokinetics during intravesical chemotherapy for the treatment of superficial transitional cell carcinoma. Br J Clin Pharmacol 52:273–278

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Witjes JA, Hendricksen K, Gofrit O et al (2009) Intravesical hyperthermia and mitomycin-C for carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder: experience of the European Synergo® working party. World J Urol 27:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Colombo R, Lev A, Da Pozzo LF et al (1995) A new approach using local combined microwave hyperthermia and chemotherapy in superficial transitional bladder carcinoma treatment. J Urol 153:959–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The study has been approved by Ethics Committee on 01/09/2008 (Protocol No. 0065331). The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All the enrolled patients gave their informed consent before the inclusion in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Gontero.

Additional information

All the authors have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soria, F., Milla, P., Fiorito, C. et al. Efficacy and safety of a new device for intravesical thermochemotherapy in non-grade 3 BCG recurrent NMIBC: a phase I–II study. World J Urol 34, 189–195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1595-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1595-3

Keywords

Navigation