Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Basic principles of anatomy for optimal surgical treatment of prostate cancer

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) with nerve sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) has experienced a substantial improvement in recent years due to new insights in anatomy of the prostate and of the adjacent structures. Knowledge of this specific anatomy is mandatory during RP in order to avoid injuries to functional tissue. Above all, these tissues are the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and the urethral sphincter. We therefore reviewed the available literature on prostatic anatomy and summarized it in this article. A search of the PubMed database was performed using the keywords radical prostatectomy, anatomy, neurovascular bundle, fascia, pelvis and sphincter. Relevant articles were reviewed, analyzed and summarized. This article gives an insight in the anatomy of the NVB, the urethral sphincter and the fascias surrounding the prostate. The NVB might be hampered near the seminal vesicles, at the lateral surface of the prostate and in the area of the prostato-urethral junction. The urethral sphincter might be hampered during dissection of the dorsal vein complex and during dissection of the urethra at the prostatic apex. Finally, the anatomy of the fascias surrounding the prostate is complex and can inter-individually vary substantially, which adds to the technical difficulties of NSRP. With this article we provide an overview on the complex anatomy of the prostate and the adjacent tissues. Respecting and considering these anatomic principles during NSRP should result in good postoperative functional outcome, as well as in good outcome in cancer control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Loeb S, Smith ND, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ (2006) Survival results in patients with screen-detected prostate cancer versus physician-referred patients treated with radical prostatectomy: early results. Urol Oncol 24:465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Litwiller SE, Djavan B, Klopukh BV, Richier JC, Roehrborn CG (1995) Radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized carcinoma of the prostate in a large metropolitan hospital: changing trends over a 10-year period (1984–1994). Dallas outcomes research group for urological disorders. Urology 45:813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, Heidenreich A, Schmid HP, van Poppel H, Wolff J, Zattoni F (2005) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 48:546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Middleton RG, Thompson IM, Austenfeld MS, Cooner WH, Correa RJ, Gibbons RP, Miller HC, Oesterling JE, Resnick MI, Smalley SR et al. (1995) Prostate cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. The american urological association. J Urol 154:2144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Cote K, Loffredo M, Schultz D, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Wein A, Richie JP (2002) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer 95:281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ (2004) Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol 172:910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT (2002) Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167:528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michl UH, Friedrich MG, Graefen M, Haese A, Heinzer H, Huland H (2006) Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 176:227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabbani F, Stapleton AM, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (2000) Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164:1929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162:433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128:492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gralnek D, Wessells H, Cui H, Dalkin BL (2000) Differences in sexual function and quality of life after nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 163:1166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H (2006) Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49:38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Majoros A, Bach D, Keszthelyi A, Hamvas A, Romics I (2006) Urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy (prospective urodynamic study). Neurourol Urodyn 25:2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baader B, Herrmann M (2003) Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis. Clin Anat 16:119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauroy B, Demondion X, Drizenko A, Goullet E, Bonnal JL, Biserte J, Abbou C (2003) The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques. Surg Radiol Anat 25:6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, Horninger W, Peschel R, Bartsch G, Vaughan ED (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lunacek A, Schwentner C, Fritsch H, Bartsch G, Strasser H (2005) Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: ‘curtain dissection’ of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int 95:1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M (2005) Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 65:136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takenaka A, Murakami G, Soga H, Han SH, Arai Y, Fujisawa M (2004) Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172:1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ (2004) Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 94:1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS (1998) Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology 51:960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. John H, Hauri D (2000) Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence. Urology 55:820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jepsen JV, Bruskewitz RC (1998) Should the seminal vesicles be resected during radical prostatectomy? Urology 51:12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zlotta AR, Roumeguere T, Ravery V, Hoffmann P, Montorsi F, Turkeri L, Dobrovrits M, Scattoni V, Ekane S, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Djavan B, Boccon-Gibod L, Schulman CC (2004) Is seminal vesicle ablation mandatory for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis on 1283 patients. Eur Urol 46:42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanda M, Dunn R, Wei JT, Hoag L, Montie JE (2003) Sexual function recovery after prostatectomy based on quantified pre-prostatectomy sexual function and use of nerve-sparing and seminal vesicle-sparing surgical techniques (Abstract 697). J Urol 169:181

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, Tomita K, Yonemasu H, Nakamura M, Oda Y, Naito S, Hasegawa Y (2004) Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Walsh PC, Retik A, Vaughan E, Wein A (eds) (2002) Anatomic radical prostatectomy. Campell’s Urology 8th edn. p 3107

  29. Hong H, Koch MO, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Gardner TA, Fyffe J, Ulbright TM, Eble JN, Cheng L (2003) Anatomic distribution of periprostatic adipose tissue: a mapping study of 100 radical prostatectomy specimens. Cancer 97:1639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Zanni G, Briganti A, Deho F, Naspro R, Farina E, Rigatti P (2005) Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48:938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U, Schlomm T, Salomon G, Graefen M, Huland H (2007) Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 51:105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, Peabody JO (2006) Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51:648–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Akita K, Sakamoto H, Sato T (2003) Origins and courses of the nervous branches to the male urethral sphincter. Surg Radiol Anat 25:387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Strasser H, Bartsch G (2000) Anatomy and innervation of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. Semin Urol Oncol 18:2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Steiner MS (2000) Anatomic basis for the continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18:9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA, de Araujo CG (1982) Urinary striated sphincter: what is its nerve supply? Urology 20:415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vernet G (1974) Innervation of the posterior urethra and bladder neck. J Urol Nephrol (Paris) 80:183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Narayan P, Konety B, Aslam K, Aboseif S, Blumenfeld W, Tanagho E (1995) Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J Urol 153:337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Takenaka A, Hara R, Soga H, Murakami G, Fujisawa M (2005) A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers. BJU Int 95:766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Karam I, Droupy S, Abd-Alsamad I, Korbage A, Uhl JF, Benoit G, Delmas V (2005) The precise location and nature of the nerves to the male human urethra: histological and immunohistochemical studies with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Urol 48:858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J (2001) Structure and function of the bladder neck. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 159:III

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Do M, Dorschner W, Salomon FV, Jurina K, Neuhaus J (2002) Is the male dog comparable to human? A histological study of the muscle systems of the lower urinary tract. Anat Histol Embryol 31:198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koyanagi T (1980) Studies on the sphincteric system located distally in the urethra: the external urethral sphincter revisited. J Urol 124:400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ganzer R, Neuhaus J, Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU (2002) Muscle systems of the lower urinary tract of the male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta): histomorphology and 3-dimensional reconstruction. J Urol 168:1603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN (2006) Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol 51:629–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Müller J (1836) Über die organischen Nerven der erektilen männlichen Geschlechtsoragne des Menschen und der Säugetiere

  47. Myers RP, Villers A (2006) Prostate cancer: principles and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 701–713

    Google Scholar 

  48. Steiner MS (2000) Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 55:427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Myers RP (2001) Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28:473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ (2000) Anatomy of Denonvilliers’ fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br J Surg 87:1288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Tobin C, Benjamin J (1945) Anatomical and surgical restudy of the Denonvilliers’ fascia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 80:373

    Google Scholar 

  52. Huland H, Noldus J (1999) An easy and safe approach to separating Denonvilliers’ fascia from rectum during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 161:1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL (1987) The surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Villers A, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Boccon-Gibod L, Stamey TA (1993) Invasion of Denonvilliers’ fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 149:793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. van Ophoven A, Roth S (1997) The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers’: a medico-historical debate. J Urol 157:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kourambas J, Angus DG, Hosking P, Chou ST (1998) A histological study of Denonvilliers’ fascia and its relationship to the neurovascular bundle. Br J Urol 82:408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lepor H, Gregerman M, Crosby R, Mostofi FK, Walsh PC (1985) Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J Urol 133:207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. McNeal JE (1988) Normal histology of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 12:619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ (1989) The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 13:21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Uchimoto K, Takenaka A, Yajima T, Sugihara K (2006) Operating behind Denonvilliers’ fascia for reliable preservation of urogenital autonomic nerves in total mesorectal excision: a histologic study using cadaveric specimens, including a surgical experiment using fresh cadaveric models. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Jochen Walz & Hartwig Huland

  2. Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre, Hamburg, Germany

    Markus Graefen & Hartwig Huland

Authors
  1. Jochen Walz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Graefen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hartwig Huland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Walz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walz, J., Graefen, M. & Huland, H. Basic principles of anatomy for optimal surgical treatment of prostate cancer. World J Urol 25, 31–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0159-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0159-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation