Abstract
Homografting of Arabidopsis thaliana scions on stocks of A. thaliana and heterografting on other species were used to study the compatibility and the ontogeny of graft union formation. Highly compatible homografting with scions of young leafy inflorescence stems was obtained on stocks of inflorescence stems growing from large 3-month-old A. thaliana plants. Histologic analysis revealed four developmental stages of graft union formation in Arabidopsis homografting: (1) development of a necrotic layer, (2) callus proliferation in the grafted scion, (3) differentiation of new vascular tissues within the scion, and (4) a full vascular graft union formation between the scion and the stock. Vascular connections were formed within the callus bridge between rootstocks and scions 15 days after grafting. Heterografts of Arabidopsis on two members of Brassicaceae, cabbage (Brassica) and radish (Raphanus), showed partial incompatible interaction with a lower level of vascular differentiation. Arabidopsis grafting on tomato (Solanaceae) rootstock showed complete incompatibility and limited noncontinuous differentiation of new vascular tissues that did not cross the scion/stock boundary. Although lacking scion/stock vascular connections, Arabidopsis scions grafted onto tomato rootstock flowered and produced seeds. This may indicate some nonvascular functional connections between the two plants, probably of parenchyma cells, further emphasizing the usefulness of Arabidopsis as a model plant for studying various levels of the complicated scion/stock relationships expressed in grafting biology. Experiments with dye transport in the xylem showed that although in general there was an agreement between the histologic study and dye transport, in Arabidopsis homografts water transport frequency was lower than functional and histologic compatability. We conclude that homografting and heterografting of Arabidopsis inflorescence stems is a convenient and reproducible method for studying the fundamental cellular genetic and molecular aspects of grafting biology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An H, Roussot C, Suarez-Lopez P, Corbesier L, Vincent C, Pineiro M, Hepworth S, Mouradov A, Justin S, Turnbull C, Coupland G (2004) CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development 131:3615–3626
Bertaccini A, Bellardi MG (1992) A rhabdovirus inducing vein yellowing in croton. Plant Pathol 41:79–82
Booker J, Chatfield S, Leyser O (2003) Auxin acts in xylem-associated or medullary cells to mediate apical dominance. Plant Cell 15:495–507
Booker J, Sieberer T, Wright W, Williamson L, Willett B, Stirnberg P, Turnbull C, Srinivasan M, Goddard P, Leyser O (2005) MAX1 encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived branch-inhibiting hormone. Dev Cell 8:443–449
Cohen R, Horev C, Burger Y, Shraiber S, Hershenhorn J, Katan J, Edelstein M (2002) Horticultural and pathological aspects of fusarium wilt management using grafted melons. HortSci 37:1069–1073
Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, Giakountis A, Farrona S, Gissot L, Turnbull C, Coupland G (2007) FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316:1030–1033
Delessert C, Wilson IW, Van Der Straeten D, Dennis ES, Dolferus R (2004) Spatial and temporal analysis of the local response to wounding in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Mol Biol 55:165–181
Dong X (2001) Genetic dissection of systemic acquired resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:309–314
Dong X (2004) Pathogen-induced systemic DNA rearrangement in plants. Trends Plant Sci 9:60–61
Edelstein M, Cohen R, Shraiber S, Pivonia S, Shteiberg D (1999) Integrated management of sudden wilt in melons, caused by Monosporascus cannonballus, using grafting and reduced rates of methyl bromide. Plant Dis 83:1142–1145
Errea P (1998) Implications of phenolic compounds in graft incompatibility in fruit tree species. Sci Hort 74:195–205
Flaishman MA, Loginovsky K, Lev-Yadun S (2003) Regenerative xylem in inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Growth Regul 22:253–258
Fluhr R (2001) Sentinels of disease. Plant resistance genes. Plant Physiol 127:1367–1374
Gebhardt K, Goldbach H (1988) Establishment graft union characterization and growth of Prunus micrografts. Physiol Plant 72:153–159
Hartmann HT, Kester DE (1975) Plant propagation: principles and practices, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 314–427
Howe GA (2004) Jasmonates as signals in the wound response. J Plant Growth Regul 23:223-237
Indig FE, Aloni R (1989) An experimental method for studying the differentiation of vessel endings. Ann Bot 64:589–592
Jayawickrama KJS, McKeand SE, Jett JB, Young E (1992) Rootstock and scion effects on carbohydrates and mineral nutrients in loblolly pine. Can J For Res 22:1966–1973
Jeffree CE, Yeoman MM (1983) Development of intercellular connections between opposing cells in a graft union. New Phytol 93:491–509
Lee JM (1994) Cultivation of grafted vegetables. 1. Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortSci 29:235–239
Lee JM, Oda M (2003) Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Hort Rev 28:61–124
Lev-Yadun S (1994) Induction of sclereid differentiation in the pith of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. J Exp Bot 45:1845–1849
Leyser O (2003) Regulation of shoot branching by auxin. Trends Plant Sci 8:541–545
Lifschitz E, Eviatar T, Rozman A, Shalit A, Goldschmidt A, Amsellem Z, Alvarez JP, Eshed Y (2006) The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6398–6403
Mapelli S, Kinet JM (1992) Plant growth regulator and graft control of axillary bud formation and development in the TO-2 mutant tomato. Plant Growth Regul 11:385–390
Nelson T (2004) Plant signaling: notes from the underground. Curr Biol 14:929–930
Orozco-Cardenas ML, Ryan CA (2002) Nitric oxide negatively modulates wound signaling in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 130:487–493
Pedalino M, Giller KE, Kipe-Nolt J (1992) Genetic and physiological characterization of the non-nodulating mutant of Phaseolus vulgaris L.-NOD125. J Exp Bot 43:843–849
Perez-Amador MA, Leon J, Green PJ, Carbonell J (2002) Induction of the arginine decarboxylase ADC2 gene provides evidence for the involvement of polyamines in the wound response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 130:1454–1463
Proebsting WM, Hedden P, Lewis MJ, Croker SJ, Proebsting LN (1992) Gibberellin concentration and transport in genetic lines of pea. Plant Physiol 100:1354–1360
Rhee SY, Somerville CR (1995) Flat-surface grafting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13:118–123
Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE (2000) Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12:707–720
Rojo E, Leon J, Sanchez-Serrano JJ (1999) Cross-talk between wound signaling pathways determines local versus systemic expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 20:135–142
Rovere CV, del Vas M, Hopp EH (2002) RNA-mediated virus resistance. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:167–172
Rowland O, Jones JD (2001) Unraveling regulatory networks in plant defense using microarrays. Genome Biol 2:1–3
Sachs T (1981) The control of patterned differentiation of vascular tissues. Adv Bot Res 9:151–262
Sachs T (1993) The role of auxin in the polar organisation of apical meristems. Aust J Plant Physiol 20:541–553
Sorefan K, Booker J, Haurogne K, Goussot M, Bainbridge K, Foo E, Chatfield S, Ward S, Beveridge C, Rameau C, Leyser O (2003) MAX4 and RMS1 are orthologous dioxygenase-like genes that regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis and pea. Genes Dev 17:1469–1474
Schilmiller AL, Howe GA (2005) Systemic signaling in the wound response. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:369–377
Strassner J, Schaller F, Frick UB, Howe GA, Weiler EW, Amrhein N, Macheroux P, Schaller A (2002) Characterization and cDNA-microarray expression analysis of 12-oxophytodienoate reductases reveals differential roles for octadecanoid biosynthesis in the local versus the systemic wound response. Plant J 32:585–601
Toogood A, Anderson P (1999) American Horticultural Society Plant Propagation: The Fully Illustrated Plant-by-Plant Manual of Practical Techniques. American Horticultural Society, Alexandria, VA
Tsukaya N, Naito S, Rédei G, Komeda Y (1993) A new class of mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana, acaulis1, affecting the development of both inflorescences and leaves. Development 118:751–764
Turnbull CGN, Booker JP, Leyser HMO (2002) Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J 32:255–262
Turquois N, Malone M (1996) Non-destructive assessment of developing hydraulic connections in the graft union of tomato. J Exp Bot 47:701–707
Walling LL (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19:195–216
Wetmore RH, Rier JP (1963) Experimental induction of vascular tissues in callus of angiosperms. Am J Bot 50:418–430
White JW, Montes C, Mendoza LY (1992) Use of grafting to characterize and alleviate hybrid dwarfness in common bean. Euphytica 59:19–25
Yeoman MM, Kilpatrick DC, Miedzybrodzka MB, Gould AR (1978) Cellular interactions during graft formation in plants, are they cognition phenomenon? Symp Soc Exp Biol 32:139–160
Zeevaart JAD (1958) Flower formation as studied by grafting. Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen, Nederland 58:1–88
Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the Old World, 3rd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flaishman, M.A., Loginovsky, K., Golobowich, S. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana as a Model System for Graft Union Development in Homografts and Heterografts. J Plant Growth Regul 27, 231–239 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-008-9050-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-008-9050-y