Skip to main content
Log in

Benthic diatom community composition in three regions of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite their ecological importance, very little is known about the taxonomy and ecology of benthic diatoms in coral-reef ecosystems. Diatom densities and community compositions were investigated in three distinct regions of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR): (a) Wet Tropics (WT), (b) Princess Charlotte Bay (PCB), and (c) the Outer Shelf (OS). About 209 taxa were observed in the GBR sediments studied, with an average abundance of 2.55 × 106 cells ml−1 in the upper 1 cm of sediment. Total diatom abundances were about twice as high in inshore reefs of PCB and WT compared with OS reefs. A redundancy analysis (RDA) of diatom composition clearly grouped the three regions separately but showed little influence of grain size, nitrogen and organic carbon content of the sediments. The only distinct correlates were inorganic carbon and the distance to the mainland associated with OS communities. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) of diatom community composition revealed significant differences between all three regions. Indicator values showed that most highly abundant taxa occurred in all regions. However, several taxa were clearly identified as characteristic of particular regions. It is hypothesised that variations in nutrient and light availability are the most likely explanation for the observed differences in community composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Battarbee RW (1986) Diatom analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 527–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland C (1987) Nutrient availability as a major determinant of differences among coastal hard substratum communities in different regions of the tropics. In: Birkeland C (ed) Comparison between Atlantic and Pacific tropical marine coastal ecosystems: community structure, ecological processes and productivity. UNESCO reports in marine science, Paris, pp 45–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Blott S, Pye K (2001) GRADISTAT: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:1237–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie J, McKergow LA, Prosser IP, Furnas M, Hughes AO, Hunter H (2003) Sources of sediment and nutrient exports to the Great Barrier Reef world heritage area. ACTFR Report No. 03/11, Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville

  • Bulla L (1994) An index of eveness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon LB, Nearhoof JE, Tilton CL (1999) Sediment grain size effect on benthic microalgal biomass in shallow aquatic ecosystems. Estuaries 22:735–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communies: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavier J, Boucher G, Chauvaud L, Fichez R, Chifflet S (2005) Benthic response to ammonium pulses in a tropical lagoon: implications for coastal environmental processes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 31:231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleve-Euler AM (1968) Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. Bibliotheca Phycologica Bd. 5, Cramer, Berlin

  • Devlin MJ, Brodie J (2005) Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behavior in coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 51:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin M, Brodie J, Waterhouse J, Mitchell A, Audas D, Haynes D (2003) Exposure of Great Barrier Reef inner-shelf reefs to river-borne contaminants. In: The 2nd national conference on aquatic environments: sustaining our aquatic environments—implementing solutions. 20–23 November 2001, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane

  • Dizon RM, Yap HT (1999) Short-term response of coral reef microphytobenthic communities to inorganic nutrient loading. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1259–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizon RM, Yap HT (2003) Metabolic changes and compositional shifts in nutrient-enriched tropical sediment communities. Sci Mar 67:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius K, De’ath G (2004) Identifying ecological change and its causes: a case study on coral reefs. Ecol Appl 14:1448–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius K, De`ath G, McCook L, Turak E, Williams D McB (2005) Changes in algal, coral and fish assemblages along water quality gradients on the inshore Great Barrier Reef. Mar Pollut Bull 51:384–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foged N (1978) Diatoms in Eastern Australia. Bibliotheca Phycologica Bd. 41, Cramer, Berlin

  • Foged N (1979)Diatoms in New Zealand, the North Island. Bibliotheca Phycologica Bd. 47, Cramer, Berlin

  • Foged N (1987) Diatoms from Viti Levu, Fiji Islands. Bibliotheca Diatomologica Bd. 14, Cramer, Berlin

  • Forster RM, Créach V, Sabbe K, Vyverman W, Stal LJ (2006) Biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship in microphytobenthic diatoms of the Westerschelde estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankovich TA, Gaiser EE, Zieman JC, Wachnicka AH (2006) Spatial and temporal distributions of epiphytic diatoms growing on Thalassia testudinum Banks ex König: relationships to water quality. Hydrobiologia 569:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnas M (2003) Catchments and corals: terrestrial runoff to the Great Barrier Reef. Australian Institute of Marine Science and CRC Reef Centre, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnas M, Mitchell A, Skuza M, Brodie J (2005) In the other 90%: phytoplankton responses to enhanced nutrient availability in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Mar Pollut Bull 51:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg RW (1995) Coral reefs in an urban embayment in Hawaii: a complex case history controlled by natural and anthropogenic stress. Coral Reefs 14:253–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JA, Alongi DM, Moriarty DJW, Pollard PC (1987) The dynamics of benthic microbial communities at Davies Reef, Central Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 6:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil CA, Chaston K, Jones A, Bird P, Longstaff B, Costanzo S, Dennison WC (2004) Benthic microalgae in coral reef sediments of the southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 23:336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Sommer U (1997) Response of epilithic microphytobenthos of the Western Baltic Sea to in situ experiments with nutrient enrichment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 160:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Sommer U (2000a) Diversity of benthic microalgae in response to colonization time and eutrophication. Aquat Bot 67:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Sommer U (2000b) Effect of continuous nutrient enrichment on microalgae colonizing hard substrates. Hydrobiologia 426:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Worm B, Lotze HK (2000) Marine microbenthic community structure regulated by nitrogen loading and grazing pressure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K, Lange-Berthalot H (1986) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 2/1 Bacillariophyceae: Naviculaceae; Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

  • Krammer K, Lange-Berthalot H (1988) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 2/2 Bacillariophyceae: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae; Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

  • Krammer K, Lange-Berthalot H (1991a) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 2/3 Bacillariophyceae: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae; Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

  • Krammer K, Lange-Berthalot H (1991b) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 2/4 Bacillariophyceae: Achnanthaceae; Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

  • Jongman R, Ter Braak C, van Tongeren O (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Lipkovich I, Smith EP (2002). Biplot and singular value decomposition macros for excel. J Stat Softw 7:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Loya Y, Lubinevsky H, Rosenfeld M, Kramarsky-Winter E (2004) Nutrient enrichment caused by in situ fish farms at Eilat, Red Sea is detrimental to coral reproduction. Mar Pollut Bull 49:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre HI, Geider RJ, Miller DC (1996) Microphytobenthos: The ecological role of the “secret garden” of unvegetated, shallow-water marine habitats. I. Distribution, abundance and primary production. Estuaries 19:186–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ (1996) Effects of herbivores and water quality on Sargassum distribution on the central Great Barrier Reef: cross-shelf transplants. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 139:179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon AD, Duggan S, De′ath (2005) Mesozooplankton dynamics in nearshore waters of the Great Barrier Reef. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 63:497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitbavkar S, Anil AC (2002) Diatoms of the microphytobenthic community: population structure in a tropical intertidal sandflat. Mar Biol 140:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty DJW, Pollard PC, Hunt WG, Moriarty CM, Wassenberg TJ (1985) Productivity of bacteria and microalgae and the effect of grazing by holothurians in sediments on a coral reef flat. Mar Biol 85:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson P, Jönsson B, Lindström Swanberg I, Sundbäck K (1991) Response of a marine shallow water sediment system to an increased load of inorganic nutrients. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 71:275–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson DM, Hagerthey SE (2001) Microphytobenthos in contrasting coastal ecosystems: biology and dynamics. In: Reise K (ed) Ecological studies. Ecological comparisons of sedimentary shores. vol. 151,Springer, Berlin, pp105–125

  • Podzorski AC, Håkansson H (1987) Freshwater and marine diatoms from Palawan (a Philippine island). Bibliotheca Diatomologica Bd. 13, J. Cramer, Berlin

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG (1990) The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartory DT, Grobbelaar JU (1984) Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia 114:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffelke B, Uthicke S, Klumpp DW (2003) Water quality, sediment and biological parameters at four nearshore reef flats in the Herbert river region, Central GBR. GBRMPA Research Publication No. 82, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville

  • Schaffelke B, Mellors J, Duke N (2005) Water quality in the Great Barrier Reef region: responses of mangrove, seagrass and macroalgal communities. Mar Pollut Bull 51:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin YI (1990) Aspects of trophic relations, productivity and energy balance in coral-reef ecosystems. In: Dubinsky Z (ed) Ecosystems of the world: 25 Coral reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 401–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin YI (1993) Coral reef ecology. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven ADL, Pantus F, Brooks D (1998) Long-term chlorophyll monitoring in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon: Status report 1, 1993–1995. GBRMPA Research Publication No. 55, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville

  • Sundbäck K, Snoeijs P (1991) Effects of nutrient enrichment on microalgal community composition in a coastal shallow-water sediment system: an experimental study. Bot Mar 34:341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas CR (1997) Identifying marine phytoplankton. Academic San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomascik T, Sander F (1987) Effects of eutrophication on reef building corals. II. Structure of scleractinian coral communities on fringing reefs, Barbados, West Indies. Mar Biol 94:53–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1981) Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 19:513–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood GJC (2002) Adaptations of tropical marine microphytobenthic assemblages along a gradient of light and nutrient availability in Suva Lagoon, Fiji. Eur J Phycol 37:449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood GJC, Kromkamp J (1999) Primary production by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos in estuaries. Adv Ecol Res 29:93–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uthicke S (2001) Interactions between sediment-feeders and microalgae on coral reefs: grazing losses versus production enhancement. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 210:125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Uthicke S (2006) Photosynthetic efficiency and rapid light curves of sediment-biofilms along a water quality gradient in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 322:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Uthicke S, Klumpp DW (1997) Ammonium excretion by holothurians enhances production and turnover in benthic diatom communities. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:873–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Uthicke S, Klumpp DW (1998) Microphytobenthos community production at a near-shore coral reef: seasonal variation and response to ammonium recycled by holothurians. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 169:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge S, Brodie J, Furnas M (2006) Exposure of inner-shelf reefs to nutrient enriched runoff entering the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Post-European changes and the design of water quality targets. Mar Pollut Bull 52:1467–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Thomas Hübener for his support. Many thanks to the crew of the RV Lady Basten, Tim Hyndes and Tim Philipps for their support in the field, to Tim Cooper for help with the statistical analyses and Kanae Kawashima for invaluable lab work. The authors wish to thank Dr. Leone Bielig for constructive comments on the manuscript. The study was funded by the Cooperative Research Centre for the GBR World Heritage Area (CRC Reef). K. Heimann acknowledges support for this work through an infrastructure grant for establishing the North Queensland Algal Identification/Culturing Facility (NQAIF) at James Cook University by the Australian Research Council (ARC), James Cook University (JCU) and the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) (LE0347105).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Gottschalk.

Additional information

Communicated by Environment Editor R. van Woesik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gottschalk, S., Uthicke, S. & Heimann, K. Benthic diatom community composition in three regions of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 26, 345–357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-007-0204-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-007-0204-3

Keywords

Navigation